Gore: Nobel Now. President Next?
PJM ROUNDUP: Al Gore's got an Oscar, an Emmy, and as of today a Nobel Peace Prize. And the "Draft Gore" movement thinks they'd all look good on his desk in the Oval Office. Click for continuously updated commentary and reaction...
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
[New Items on Top]
GM’s Corner: “The point, dear reader, is the beatification of on Albert Gore, tireless crusader for pseudo-science and popularizer of lies to foster a “larger truth.” The way to sainthood for, as I like to call him Owlgore, has a couple of purposes, one to “reward” him for having had the 2000 election “stolen” (it wasn’t) and two because he is such a force for bad science; the antithesis of what Alfred Nobel Stood for.”
View From a Height: “In any case, rumor has it that Al Gore is chartering the QE II to ferry his lawyers over to Oslo in the event of a recount.”
Gates of Vienna: “As I said, we don’t live in a perfect world. Thus the likes of Gore can triumph over the venerable history of the Salvation Army. Yet long after his theories and bombast are but distant, embarrassing echoes, the Salvation Army will be carrying on as it has since its beginnings.”
Maxine: “Please educate us at MAXINE, what does bad climate science prediction have to do with the effort of reducing violent difference resolution between organized human beings around the world?”
The Lede: “This year’s prize, like the last few, shows that the Nobel committee continues to use an expansive notion of “peace” and who and what make the most significant contributions to it. Some of the conservative reaction scoffs at the notion that global warnings about global warming are within its scope (especially false warnings, as the right sees them), while those who agree with Mr. Gore wonder how anyone could fail to make the connection between carbon emissions and global conflict.”
Vodkapundit: “Gore hasn’t brought us peace, but he’s sure waging a fine war against capitalism. And if there’s one thing a bunch of herring-stuffed Nordic socialists love, it’s anybody who makes millions by attacking free markets.”
Melanie Phillips: “Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Gore- along with the wretched Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change whose own untruths would fill a book - perfectly symbolises a western world that has lost its reason and its capacity to tell truth from lies.
Extreme Mortman: “Al Gore, Emissary of Peace … or merchant of war and death?”
Power Line: “When did the Nobel Peace Prize go off the tracks? Today’s award to Al Gore and the IPCC ‘for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change’ fits in with a subset of cosmopolitan frauds, fakers, murderers, thieves, and no-accounts going back about twenty years.”
Roger Simon: “Gore Deserves Nobel Prize More Than Oscar”
QandO: “If there was any suspense in this award at all it was whether or not Al would take a private jet to the ceremony or fly commercial.”
Scared Monkeys: “The question that many should be asking is, WHY isn’t Al “its not easy being green” Gore not running for the presidency? One would truly think that if someone was so concerned with their cause and it meant the survival of all mankind that they would run for the office to be the leader of the free world and use that platform for good. So why isn’t Al running?”
Dr. Sanity: “I’m amazed. I thought Cindy Sheehan had it all sewn up. Or Hugo Chavez.”
Hot Air: “It’s like getting an A++ on John Kerry’s all-important ‘global test.’”
Fark: “Woman who saved 2500 Jews during the Holocaust given Nobel Peace Prize — just kidding, it’s the guy who emits over a ton of CO2 a year telling us to stop global warming”
Michelle Malkin notes Czech president Vaclav Klaus being “’somewhat surprised’ that former US vice president Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize, the president’s spokesman Petr Hajek said in a statement.”
A Second Hand Conjecture: “I can only assume they wanted to give him an award, and if they tried to give him one in the sciences the scientific community would double over in laughter. The ironic thing is that the IPCC has actually compiled some real science, while Al Gore’s claims are way out of the consensus the panel is trying to achieve. The claims Gore makes are an embarrassment to the scientific consensus. Most of the much derided “skeptics” are closer to the IPCC’s work than Al Gore.”
Sisu: “Running with the herd trumps the search for truth.”
ScrappleFace: “Although former Vice President Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize this week for his work as a global-warming performance artist, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled early today that President George Bush would receive the gold medal, the diploma and the $750,000.”
Neo-Neocon: “Why am I so down on Gore? I don’t like the politicization of science and the concomitant twisting of facts in that effort. I certainly don’t mind him presenting a scientific point of view he believes is vital for the world to know, but the evidence is clear that Gore’s devotion to truth in his movie has been only a trifle behind that of Oliver Stone’s biopics.”
Daimnation: “I would have preferred to see the Prize go to some of the people putting their lives on the line to fight tyranny in Zimbabwe, Burma or the Middle East, but we knew this was coming.”
Damian Thompson: “The former US Vice-President has already taken over from Michael Moore as the most sanctimonious lardbutt Yank on the planet. Can you imagine what he’ll be like now that the Norwegian Nobel committee has given him the prize? More to the point, can you imagine how enormous his already massive carbon footprint will become once he starts jetting around the world bragging about his new title?”
Carpetbagger Report: “media attention immediately shifted to whether Gore would parlay the Nobel Peace Prize into a presidential campaign. The speculation strikes me as wildly misplaced.”
No More Mister Nice Blog: “I know I’m questioning a virtually unchallengeable bit of conventional wisdom, but can someone please explain to me why winning the Nobel Peace Prize would improve Al Gore’s presidential prospects in any way whatsoever?”
Gina Cobb: “So the Nobel Prize committee closes its eyes to the biggest source of violence against innocent civilians in the world today — Islamic terrorism — and instead goes searching for debatable problems that haven’t necessarily killed anyone yet, but might someday.”
The Opinion Mill: “Quite a decade Al Gore is having: first he wins the 2000 presidential election, and now he gets to share this year’s Nobel Peace Prize with the U.N. panel on climate change. He never got to enjoy the first accomplishment, but there’s no way the Supreme Court can rob him of this one - even if Scalia and Thomas figure out a way to suspend airline service to Scandinavia, or King George II decides to bomb Norway and Sweden, Gore’s name is on the thing and that’s that.”
Pirate’s Cove: “The Nobel Prize committee has basically surrendered to hysterics, mass exaggerators, and liars, most of who are not even climatologists or even any type of scientist.”
Ken McCracken: “Just goes to show you that the Nobel Peace Prize is about as authentic a recognition of achievment in the field of peace as a winning lottery notification via email. Perhaps even less.”
Fausta’s Blog: “Tripping over themselves to further assininity, the Committee bypassed true heroes of the worldwide struggle for freedom, such as the Burmese monks and the Ladies in White”
Tom Bevan @ RCP: “I still don’t think he’s going to do it, if for no other reason than because after the amazing run he’s had over the last two years it would be a bitter end to put himself on the line and lose out to Hillary Clinton. Then again, the urge for redemption may be too strong for Gore to resist.”
Right Wing Nut House: “I doubt whether Hillary Clinton is losing any sleep over a potential Gore candidacy. She’s way ahead, she has more money than God, and it’s just about 90 days to the New Hampshire primary - not enough time to pull an organization together, raise the money, and run any kind of a professional campaign. It’s not that his chances of success would be small. His chances of success would be zero.”
Confederate Yankee: “I wasn’t even aware that they had a Nobel Prize for deceptive rhetoric.”
Big Lizards: “I assume that if Gore does decide to run, his entire campaign will more or less revolve around implementing some draconian, Luddite shutdown of industry in order to appease the Globaloney gods. Will that, combined with his status as the angriest dog in the world, be enough to knock Hillary off her pedestal of clay?”
On Deadline publishes Gore’s statement in reaction to the award.
Leaning Straight Up: “I’m disgusted, but no more then I was in 2000 when he went on his robotic mission to count all democrat votes in Florida. Apparently the Nobel Peace Prize is not what it used to be.”
Ann Althouse: “Is Al supposed to sit home and content himself with his collection of every prize but the presidency? Or is he going to emerge from his world of warmth - where everyone effuses over his brilliant goodness - and come back to the cold reality of a presidential campaign? And what is Hillary thinking right now?”
Perri Nelson: “Perhaps that political activity, those lectures, and his films and books would mean a bit more if our new Nobel laureate practiced what he preaches. It’s not the first time the liberals in Oslo have rewarded fraud.”
Brilliant at Breakfast: “He’s not going run for president. If you were Al Gore, would YOU run for president? Would YOU subject yourself and your family to endless ruminations in the media and attacks from the right about your weight, your clothes, your son’s legal problems, their exhumation of old (and largely imaginary) scandals? Would you want to endure another year of Maureen Dowd saying you’re “practically lactating” and the press accusing you of lying — and that’s before you have to endure four to eight years of nonstop attacks from the media if you’re not able to clean up Bush’s mess quickly enough?”
Tom Curry @ MSNBC: “the record of the American politicians who have won the Peace Prize since it was first handed out in 1901 shows that if you win, it’s an indication that your peak has passed. Theodore Roosevelt, the one American Peace Prize winner who tried to stage a political comeback, failed. The list of previous American winners is dominated by politicians and statesmen whose careers in public office had ended or were soon to end: Jimmy Carter in 2002, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1973, former Secretary of State George Marshall in 1953, and Vice President Charles G. Dawes in 1925.”
David Roberts @ Huffington Post: “No, it would be a disaster for Gore to enter the race at this point — not because he might lose, but because he has transcended U.S. partisan politics. He has become a figure of global stature, one of a tiny fraternity of private individuals in the world capable of driving historical change from outside the confines of any institution.”
The Swamp: “The Nobel is a huge honor recognized worldwide and gives him even more stature. It gives him a moment to reconsider the race for the Democratic nomination, now led by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.”
Politico: “A top Gore adviser said the prize - the latest in a string of awards Gore has won for his environmental work - will not push him into running.”
Outside The Beltway: “This continues the trend of the Peace Prize being awarded, not for achievements in spreading peace, but to highlight the Committee’s political agenda.”
Jonas Kyratzes: “Seriously, people. There are certainly more disgusting figures than Gore - Bush, Kerry, Blair, etc. But just because he’s occasionally put forth an idea which isn’t catastrophically idiotic (Bush), appallingly opportunistic (Kerry) or just butt-crawlingly evil (Blair), doesn’t mean he should be elevated to being the god of the Vaguely Progressive There’s Something Wrong With The World But We Refuse To Use Our Brains To Analyze It movement.”
This Ain’t Hell: “The fact that British courts even decided last week that the documentary is full of inaccuracies didn’t deter the committee from making the politically-correct decision.”
Daily Kos: “The “world” - or at least the millions of the world’s citizens who have seen An Inconvenient Truth, and the far fewer who have read the IPCC’s extensive reports on global warming - may indeed have an understanding of the measures that need to be adopted. But we’re far from overcoming the political obstacles in the way of actually adopting those measures. One of the chief obstacles sits today in the Oval Office. Scores of others clutter Congress.”
Catallaxy: “Whatever the scientific merits of the IPCC’s work, this still seems like an odd choice. But no odder than honouring Yasser Arafat.”
Sharon Cobb: “A lesson for all: No matter how much ridicule and rejection you endure, believe in yourself and what you’re fighting for and one day you might end up winning the Nobel Peace Prize, not to mention, change the world for the better.
Free Frank Warner: “I heard all the talk that Al Gore was the front-runner for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, but I was certain it was a joke.”
The Hill’s Pundit Blog: “America does not need another prize, we need another president.”
Rising Hegemon: “Here’s my prediction, Al Gore who has no way of knowing and who has no say or control over the matter anyway WILL NOT WIN THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE TOMORROW. And when he does not win the award, there will be a HAPPY DANCE from the Right Wing about a man who had no say in the matter not winning the award, like Al Gore got punked.”
Press release from the Nobel Prize Committee.
Illustration Courtesy of NewsBusters.org
| Comment |  Digg This |
 del.icio.us |
 |
 |
 PJM Home |
35 Comments
Joe Schw:Where is this magic dust Gore uses to turn his hippie like love for trees into a NPP? Like the Pied-Piper, the easily lead automatons will mindlessly follow the fad of the day, instead of looking at the concerns of tomorrow. The environment will not be the concern of the millions who would lose jobs with his misguided ideas, based on false misleading facts. It certainly would not be the concern of the millions that would die at the hands of terrorist who would play on Gore’s idealistic soft-spot, to spread hate and fear throughout the world. Wasn’t Gore on watch when the 9/11 hijackers were planning their attack? Wasn’t he on watch when North Korea was developing nuclear weapons?
Oct 12, 2007 - 4:44 am Frank:Nope, Al won’t run; he’s discovered where the real money’s at, and couldn’t afford the pay cut. In the public sector he doesn’t have to worry anymore about those pesky little things like truth or accountablitiy; just, “Who’ll bite on my latest schtick?”
Oct 12, 2007 - 4:51 am Boris:Hmmm….The right wing is going to be apoplectic about this for some time. The IPCC deserves the prize much more than Gore, but the right’s hatred of him should cause them to make fools of themselves for years to come.
Oct 12, 2007 - 5:03 am Ban:At this point I must say that I respect the winners of the Darwin awards much more than the creeps receiving the Nobel!
Oct 12, 2007 - 5:05 am David Thomson:Al Gore receive the Nobel Prize only because he is damaging the United States. He is simply another Jimmy Carter. The world’s “elites” want to see our economy go into a deep recession.
I also now believe Gore will run for the presidency. He will do so because of the anger he feels towards Hillary Clinton. She apparently screwed him big time while he was vice president. It will be all about revenge.
Oct 12, 2007 - 5:47 am Roy:Is this better or worse than Rigoberta Menchu?
Oct 12, 2007 - 5:48 am RedWineHaiku:Global warming has undoubtedly contributed to the increasing abundance of affordable and delicious wines from all over the globe. Please, someone stop this man!
Oct 12, 2007 - 5:49 am M. Simon:You can add:
Al Gore Joins Yasser Arafat
to the list.
Oct 12, 2007 - 5:58 am newton:Do you know when I stopped taking the Nobel prizes seriously?
The day I realized that one person got a Peace Prize for pretty much letting a McD’s near Red Square (Mikhail Gorbachev), yet not even one member of the Triumvirate that made the fall of the Soviet Empire (Thatcher, Reagan, Pope John Paul II) was ever recognized for their role.
Of course, Rigoberta Menchu, Arafat, and Jimmy Carter.
Al Gore - last nail in the coffin, at least to me.
Oct 12, 2007 - 6:10 am David Thomson:“Hmmm….The right wing is going to be apoplectic about this for some time.”
Right wing? No, that has got nothing to with it. The typical critic of global warming is a scholar who has devoted their lives to the subject matter. They find logical gaps in Al Gore’s arguments. It is also peculiar that the former vice-president is unable to respond to these respected individuals. What is he afraid of?
Oct 12, 2007 - 6:20 am mahon:I’m fine with it. I just wish they had honored Henny Penny and Turkey Lurkey at the same time. Or maybe they work for that UN thingee they threw in.
Oct 12, 2007 - 6:28 am William Teach:The original purpose of the Peace Prize was to award it “to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses”.
I seem to be missing the part where Gore and the UN hysterics actually had any part of that for promoting global warming as caused by Man.
Now, a liberal stated that it fits in to the “fraternity of nations” clause, but that is about peace between nations.
Of course, remember that Stalin was nominated twice.
Oct 12, 2007 - 6:31 am RealityCheck:It is so funny to see the right wing zealots go crazy over Al Gore winning probably the most prestigious award in the world. I guess that does take them away from their normal racist anti-Jena Six or sliming a sick child (Graeme Frost). You parents must be so proud.
Oct 12, 2007 - 6:46 am raji maji:Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, the first weapon of mass destruction, thought himself a pacifist. Ironic that the prize goes to someone who’s agenda is to stop the by-products into our atmosphere of the same material that the Prize inventor created. Think of the results dynamite has had on our climate. Thermite brought down 3 WTC’s. Those 3 buidings were imploded from within, airplanes had nothing to do with the collapses. This is the begining of the end my friends. You can’t eat money, diamonds or gold. The currency of the furture will be bullets. RAJI-MAJISH SHALOM
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:01 am DANEgerus:“I invented the Nobel Prize” — Al Gore
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:04 am Ken McCracken:Woah, 9/11 was an environmental disaster because the WTC was brought down by thermite?
Raji maji, you are obviously some kind of comedy writer - have you worked for any shows we might be familiar with?
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:10 am Fred Beloit:Let us suppose for a moment, although I hate to give certain people ideas, that DailyKos gave out an annual world peace prize. The winners might include Levin, Lamont, Baldwin, Penn, Obama, Beauchamp. Why would any conservative care? The committee who choses the Nobel Peace Prize is composed of like-minded people. No surprise or even interest here. Why react at all?
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:11 am M. Simon:raji,
Are you planning to eat bullets?
Is the coming thing shitting bullets? Would that be lead in your diet or depleted uranium?
Is there a remedy for bullet constipation? A hand grenade enema?
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:27 am Miako:I am a liberal.
It is still me who is laughing.
A powerpoint presentation, no matter how good, does not deserve an Oscar.
Work towards reducing an incipient Global Catastrophe (that is also an American National Security Issue) has only a very thin thread towards reducing strife between nations. But hey, if producing better crops can win, this should as well.
Gore deserves better prizes than these — not so much for his ideas, as for BrandGore: the ability to take ideas and bring them into the public mind.
If it were me, I would award him a prize for best publicist.
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:37 am Mollace:Look who’s whining now!
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:52 am fulldroolcup:George Bernard Shaw once said (loosely paraphrasing): “I can easily forgive Alfred Nobel for unleashing dynamite on the world, but not the fiend in human form who came up with the Nobel Peace Prize”.
Amen.
Oct 12, 2007 - 8:25 am Boris:“The typical critic of global warming is a scholar who has devoted their lives to the subject matter.”
Um, no. The people who devote their lives to climate study agree that global warming is human caused. Pick up a journal on climate study recently?
Oct 12, 2007 - 9:24 am ecj-maxine:Please educate us at MAXINE, what does bad climate science prediction have to do with the effort of reducing violent difference resolution between organized human beings around the world?
We are not naive, we understand the European calculation and thinking behind this particular bestowment. We know they had to have trouble with just giving the award outright to Al Gore alone. After all, it was the same calculated thinking that gave Al Gore an Oscar for his now legally, and officially discredited quasi-documentary and PowerPoint Presentation, “An Inconvenient Truth”.
Elite Europeans and Hollywood have an inbred thought process as it relates to the freedoms the United States has for its citizens. From capitolism, to gun possesion to health care, the template is the same - Hate Freedom, Embrace Socialism … at any price and level of discredit.
Let the persistent accolades begin - “I can’t think of anyone who deserves it more … due to his sacrifices … than Al Gore!”
We can’t wait.
Oct 12, 2007 - 9:32 am goy:“The people who devote their lives to climate study agree that global warming is human caused.
Don’t you mean “The people whose livelihoods depend on grants for climate study agree…”?
Even the IPCC has clearly admitted that “Most” of the observable trends are “very likely” due to human causes. “Most” is never assigned a percentage and “very likely” describes an interval with no reliable value. So statistically this ultimately works out to about a 50-50 shot, and one need not be a scientist to calculate that.
The Nobel Committee willfully ignores reality with this
Oct 12, 2007 - 10:55 am ic:rewardaward, and it should be loudly and widely denounced as the lie that it is.Prediction: Al Gore will get another Nobel in his 90’s, for working so relentlessly to call the world’s attention to the great calamity about to destroy Earth. His documentary, the Coming Ice Age, has garnered him an Oscar and an Emmy. The greenhouse gas, namely CO2, that has trapped heat to cause global warming, also block the sun from shining thru causing the earth to cool alarmingly. The sad thing is the Americans have never learned, they are still addicted to their consumptions of fossil fuels. Al was saddened by the fact that next time when global warming comes around again, he might be too old to make another documentary to save the world.
Oct 12, 2007 - 6:04 pm Garden Gnome:If environmentalism is a qualification for the Peace Prize, then for the next prize why not nominate Woodsy Owl? After all, he even has a catchy phrase; “Give a hoot, don’t pollute!”
He has made pollution an important issue to school age kids all over the world. Go Woodsy!
What’s that you say? The winner can’t be a fictional character? Really?
Oct 12, 2007 - 7:50 pm dr:I’m still crestfallen that Rush didn’t win. With all the inaccuracies and errors in ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, it’s no wonder old Al wins the Nobel — nothing socialists like more than rewarding a big lie. The truth is Al’s a fraud and the Nobel nabobs are morons.
Oct 12, 2007 - 8:51 pm GCA:Boris, you are a humorless idiot. Ask Galileo about scientific consensus. Oh! that’s right… he was murdered by the consensus enforcers of his time. We are apparently entering the neo-dark ages, pulled full speed ahead by left wing luddites who have anointed Al Gore as their unassailable prophet of doom. Who else, other than Goebbels, ever managed to get past rational argument with those with whom he disagreed simply by saying, without logical support but with plenty of junk science, that the argument is over and I have won? Horsepucky, but dangerous horsepucky.
History will not be kind to Al Gore. Those who put their faith in him, for religion it truly is, will be regarded as gullible fools in 100 years. Perhaps by then your, and Al’s, intellectual (I use the word loosely) descendants will be wringing their hands over projections of another ice age.
Boris, go spew your condescending drivel to the rest of the sycophantic twits you so enthusiastically embrace and leave us rational people alone.
Oct 13, 2007 - 12:32 am Linda Martin:Those who want Al Gore to enter the race believe that his high name ID will help him if he enters the race now. The same can be said for Condi Rice. Yes, this is true. Her name ID is over 90%, saving millions in advertising. Her job approval is over 50%, saving more TV ads to tell people about her.
Did you know that the latest Zogby poll shows 41% of the Republicans believe that Condi Rice brings excitement to the 2008 race.
Condi Rice is worth $30 million in advertising and would bring REAL foreign policy experience to the GOP ticket instead of just flying off to London and then claiming foreign policy experience. The people of the United States know that she has brought diplomacy back to the White House. Only the power-hungry Democrats have been seeking to undermine her and her diplomatic efforts. Could it be that the Democrats are afraid that if Condi Rice was on the 2008 ticket, she would bring women and minority voters to the GOP?
Oct 13, 2007 - 10:19 am stubbs:Do any of you think the Democrats would be willing to “muddy up” Condi so that she is not worthy of being on the GOP ticket?
Stay tuned and watch how the Democrats continue to undermine diplomacy in the coming weeks.
The only thing left for the left to bestow on him is the Pulitzer for fiction.
Oct 13, 2007 - 9:01 pm peterj:The whole planet would cool off by 2 or 3 degrees if Al Gore would just shut up.
Oct 13, 2007 - 9:26 pm Webutante:My prediction is that Al will no more be president than Fred next yeear. What would he gain, he’s already world czar/messiah? And he would have to tangle with Hillary and Bill, a hornets’ nest he simply won’t want to mess with.
He’ll never be or run for President of the United States….but maybe of the One World, one day.
Oct 14, 2007 - 9:37 am Wolf Pangloss:I hope that someday I will see AlGoracle hosting the Global Warming Family Feud, every afternoon at 4 o’clock eastern time.
Oct 15, 2007 - 6:18 am Peggy McGilligan:Nobel Peace Prize: NEW Global Warming Antiperspirant
AP - Al Gore has for a long time been full of hot air. He has a vivid imagination about the world around him. His inherent mistrust of the seasons seems to stem from an episode of the Twilight Zone, in which the Earth gets too close to the Sun. Summers are hot & sticky, and Al is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures needed to create a more effective global deodorant.
If college roommate, Tommy Lee Jones, could save the City of Los Angeles from errant magma (Volcano), and the world entire from a giant cockroach (Men In Black), then certainly big Al Gore deserves a prize for his global initiative to combat global wetness. The same active ingredient and trusted formula that kept our leaders dry during the Cold War - now in unscented. As the planet heats up, you don’t have to! Clinton tested: guaranteed to leave no trace.
Now that Global Warming has been legitimized, a “private group” out of Monterey California of all places, wants to seed the North Atlantic with iron oxide particulate, to help plankton absorb more carbon dioxide (greenhouse gasses). Strategy: “cleanup the planet and make a buck on the side.” Another inconvenient truth; here’s how their misguided scam to pirate the “Peace Dividend” sparked the worst terrorist attacks on United States soil: http://theseedsof9-11.com
Oct 16, 2007 - 12:01 pm Media Lies:I thought it was a joke when a rumor spread that Al Gore was up for the Nobel Peace Prize. I don’t think even honest Democrats take this guys seriously. Now we all know the true joke is the Nobel Peace Prize.
Apr 19, 2008 - 12:22 am