Ironically, however, the same issue of The New York Timescontains this article on the triumph of an Army of Davids kind of approach in space suit design, an idea that was originally proposed by blogger Rand Simberg. (And here's another article on the same thing.) So critics of amateur efforts can get good reviews in the NYT, even while the amateurs are, you know, actually doing stuff. Seems about right . . . .
The mayhem in the Niger Delta is costing about $4.4 billion in damages and lost revenue each year. But the loss is just shrugged off as a cost of doing business. The corrupt leadership is nothing if not adaptable. The Nigerian people are still doing most of the suffering. The shut down oil production means there is less money to steal. The growing number of kidnappings means more jobs for bodyguards and security personnel. The tribe based gangs in the Niger Delta are evolving into businesses, based on intimidation, theft and corruption. The inability of anyone to get really organized means there is unlikely to be a unified and effective rebellion. The system just staggers, with individuals and small groups grabbing what they can.
Sixty miles up, you sit in a chair on the open deck of a small rocket, admiring the stars above, the Earth far, far below. The vacuum beyond your visor is cold, but it would boil your blood if your pressure suit failed. You give your parachute straps a reassuring pat. It’s utterly silent. Just you and your fragile body, hovering alone above the Earth. “Space Diver One, you are go,” crackles a voice in your ear, and you undo your harness and stand up. There’s nothing for it now: You paid a lot of money for this.
You breathe deeply and leap, somersaulting into the void. The mother planet is gorgeous from up here. You barely perceive that it’s rushing up toward you, and your body relaxes. You streak into the atmosphere at 2,500 miles an hour, faster than anyone’s ever gone without a vehicle. The sky lightens, the stars disappear behind the blue, and a violent buffeting begins. You deploy your drogue chute for stability; an uncontrolled spin in this thin air would rip you apart. The thick lower atmosphere slows you to 120 mph—terminal velocity. After a thrilling seven-minute plummet, you pull your main chute at 3,000 feet, hands shaking, and glide in for landing. A mile away, your rocket retro-thrusts its way gently to the ground.
Sounds cool. I'd like to be -- well, not the first guy to do that. Maybe the fourth.
Judge Posner said the US was "a law-saturated society where even non-lawyers tend to think ofproblems in terms of legal categories".
"Criminal justice and war are the two responses we have to terrorism. Each comes with its own legal institutions and doctrines and regimes but the struggle against international terrorism doesn't fit either very well."
He said it was "quite misplaced" to suggest national security measures in force or contemplated in the US could endanger liberty and undermine the political system. This was because governments could no longer conceal what they did: "We have a very aggressive media and a huge and complex government where many people in the government are quite willing to talk to the press."
I hope he's wrong about the threat, but right about the ability of the public to police government overreaching. You can hear our podcast interview with him here.
THIS SEEMS LIKE GOOD NEWS: "Sunni militias that once fought U.S. troops are now seeking to join them, frustrated by al Qaeda's influence in parts of Baghdad, a U.S. commander said on Friday. . . . 'They are tired of al Qaeda and the influence of al Qaeda in their tribes and in their neighborhoods and they want them cleaned out and they want to form an alliance in order to rid themselves of this blight.'" Let's hope this meets with continued success.
A HANDS-ON REVIEW OF THE IPHONE, from Brendan Loy. Turns out that the virtual keyboard is something of an issue after all: "If you’re accustomed to sending short text messages and writing brief e-mails from your phone while not doing anything else that you need to look at, this is not a big problem. If you’re accustomed to composing and publishing a dozen 256-character blog posts on your phone during the course of a football game you’re attending, it’s a somewhat more serious concern." But the big deal-killer for Brendan is that you can't use it as a modem, the way you can use many phones, Treos, etc.
Most obviously, the iPhone is locked, as is de rigueur in the wireless world. It will work only with one carrier, AT&T. Judged by the standards of a personal computer or electronics, that's odd: Imagine buying a Dell that worked only with Comcast Internet access or a VCR that worked only with NBC. Despite the fact that the iPhone costs $500 or so, it cannot yet be brought over to T-Mobile or Verizon or Sprint. AT&T sees this as a feature, not a bug, as every new iPhone customer must commit to a two-year, $1,400 to $2,400 contract.
If Apple wanted to be "revolutionary," it would sell an unlocked version of the iPhone that, like a computer, you could bring to the carrier of your choice. An even more radical device would be the "X Phone"—a phone on permanent roam that chose whatever network was providing the best service. Imagine, for example, using your iPhone to talk on Sprint because it had the best voice coverage in Alaska, while at the same time using Verizon's 3G network for Internet access. Of course, getting that phone to market would be difficult, and Apple hasn't tried.
A TROUBLING OBSERVATION: "'There is enormous pride among young officers in their units and in each other,' says Lt. Col. Peter Kilner, who recently returned from two months in Iraq interviewing young Army officers for a research project. 'But I see strong evidence that they are rapidly losing faith in the Army and the country's political leadership.'"
UPDATE: A reader emails:
I agree this article is troubling to the extent Army officers are concerned about the quality of their Generals' decisions and leadership but my reaction to this story was quite different. To see mid-level management challenge their bosses is exactly what a large organization needs when there are problems at the basic level.
We can't reasonably expect a bureaucracy as large as the military to be innovative and efficient. Just the opposite: Like any large institution, the military is and has been slow to adjust to changing conditions. (Just ask my WWII veteran Dad what he thinks about Generals and how they ran WWII - you'll get an earful even though it's been over 60 years!) But the military can change, and it happens when people like Col. Yingling express doubts and ask questions.
Good point. It was the loss of confidence in the political leadership that troubled me, though. Not that it isn't largely justified.
The second experimental pathfinder spacecraft by Bigelow Aerospace, Genesis II, has been successfully launched and inserted into orbit. The privately-funded space station module was launched on a Dnepr rocket Thursday morning from the ISC Kosmotras Yasny Cosmodrome in the Orenburg region of Russia.
The company reports the flight and stage separation of the Dnepr performed as planned, with Genesis II separating from its rocket about 14 minutes into orbit. The company's Mission Control in North Las Vegas, NV made first contact at 2:20 pm Thursday afternoon.
Robert T. Bigelow, Bigelow Aerospace founder and owner of the Budget Suites of America hotel chain, has committed $500 million toward building a private commercial space station by 2015, according to the International Herald-Tribune.
UPDATE: This is pretty impressive: "Sky News sources say one of the first police officers on the scene of the Haymarket car bomb may have saved dozens of lives by defusing the explosives before the bomb squad arrived. It is believed the quick-thinking cop recognised that the car was wired to blow up, jumped in and disconnected the trigger device, thought to be a mobile phone." (Via Will Collier).
OUR FIRST COPY OF Garden & Gun Magazine just showed up in the mail. Looks pretty cool.
When it comes to elected officials and earmarks, the policy seems to be the less said the better.
This time the cold shoulder is coming from the Senate, which, like members of the House of Representatives, don't want the public to know which pet projects they want taxpayers to fund.
Since Monday, CNN has called -- or tried to call -- all 100 senators, asking them if they would release their 2008 earmark requests. More often then not, calls were immediately sent to voice mail and never returned. (Watch how senators responded to questions about earmarks Video)
Only six senators gave us their requests and five said they made no earmark requests. Nineteen said they would not give us their requests and 70 did not return calls.
A Muslim nation, Pakistan, and the United States worked together to head the drive to stop an effort to give nukes to Arabia — most likely Saudi Arabia, you know, the home to 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11.
I have been lying about my disinterest in the iPhone. When it was first announced I considered having my marriage annulled so I could be married to a picture of the iPhone, okay? I will be in line at the Apple Store at the Mall of America this afternoon, and will post an account tonight with pictures and video as soon as I have one in my hand. If blogging seems distracted and intermittent today, that’s why: I have a mission. I have a goal. I have a dream. I also have a contract with another cellular provider. It’s a sickness, I tell you. A sickness.
JOHN HINDERAKER: "The Democrats have handed conservatives a golden issue by attempting to bring down talk radio."
MARK TAPSCOTT IS FEELING BETTER: "Winston Churchill once remarked that God takes care of drunks and the United States of America and so it seems to be as we approach the end of a remarkable week in which milestones of success for the conservative movement come one after another."
BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION? Hell, I've seen it done! "In that time, the bacteria have changed significantly. For one thing, they are bigger — twice as big on average as their common ancestor. They are also far better at reproducing in these flasks, dividing 70 percent faster than their ancestor. These changes have emerged through spontaneous mutations and natural selection, and Dr. Lenski and his colleagues have been able to watch them unfold. When Dr. Lenski began his experiment 18 years ago, only a few scientists believed they could observe evolution so closely. Today evolutionary experiments on microbes are under way in many laboratories."
BOMB THREAT AVERTED: "British police said they discovered an explosive device in a car abandoned outside a nightclub in the West End theater and entertainment district of central London early today and began a terrorism investigation."
BUSH ON IMMIGRATION: A UNITER, NOT A DIVIDER: "Bipartisanship! Indeed, the coalition opposing the bill was slightly more bipartisan than the coalition favoring the bill. In the crucial cloture vote, only 26% of the 46 Senators in the minority voting for the bill were Republicans, while fully 30% of the Senators in the majority voting against the bill were Democrats (or Vermont Socialists)."
UPDATE: Rich Lowry says the bill's defeat was a victory for the techno-populists:
Once, the Senate leadership would have been able to lean on members opposed to the bill to do a dishonest two-step to pass it. First, vote for cloture to end debate over the bill, which requires 60 votes and was the toughest hurdle. Then, vote against it on final passage, which takes only 50 votes -- so there would be more wiggle room for "no" votes. This way, the Senate leadership would have gotten its bill, and senators opposed to it could tell constituents back home that they had voted against it. But bloggers and talk-radio hosts blocked that dodge by sending up a cry, "A vote for cloture is a vote for amnesty."
In the end, support for the bill literally collapsed. Even the imperious Voinovich voted against cloture. Now, there is really no such thing as an "inside game" anymore, since bloggers make sure it gets "outside." Both the right and the left will take advantage of this, for good and ill policy ends. But it's clearly an enhancement of democracy. Senators should get used to it, and buy more phone lines.
PORK HYPOCRISY IN THE WHITE HOUSE? "Democratic and Republican appropriators are accusing President Bush of urging Congress to pack spending bills with pet projects despite his high-profile crackdown on earmarks this year. A House Appropriations Committee report accompanying legislation funding the Department of the Interior shows that Bush requested 93 of the 321 earmarks in the bill." But read the whole thing, as the White House claims that the process is different.
UPDATE: Yeah: "Now, it may be that some of these projects are perfectly worthwhile, but, once again the president's tin ear becomes all too visible. If the GOP is to make a serious effort to avoid disaster in 08, it will have to involve distancing itself from the "Washingtoness" epitomized by the earmarking process (it's not so much the spending, as the way that that spending is decided) or, for that matter, procedural trickery such as the clay pigeon.
So long as it is the party of Lott or, for that matter, the party of Bush, the chances of that happening are, shall we say, remote."
I had a column on why National ID was a bad idea over at FoxNews.com over five years ago -- I can't find it now, but I still think it's a bad idea.
UPDATE: Heck, it was nearly six years ago -- thanks to Don Surber for finding the archived version.
LIBERTY VS. EQUALITY at Vassar College. "In the fifties, the liberties of many universities were suspended under pressure of McCarthyism. Today, they are under siege from their own faculties, administrations, and student bodies."
(1) Make the process open, transparent, and timely, with hearings, drafts on the Internet, and no last-minute bills that no one has read;
(2) Earn people's trust, don't demand it, and treat enforcement like it matters;
(3) Respect people who follow the law, and make legal immigration easier, cheaper, and simpler, rather than the Kafkaesque nightmare it is now;
(4) Don't feel you have to be "comprehensive" -- address the problems you can deal with first. The trust needed to deal with other problems will come later, after you've shown some success and some good faith.
You don't have to pack your bags quite yet, but passenger travel to the Moon is on the flight manifest of a space tourist company.
The price per seat will slap your wallet or purse for a swift $100 million - but you'll have to get in line as the first voyage is already booked.
Space Adventures, headquartered in Vienna, Virginia, is in negotiations with the customers who will fly the first private expedition to circumnavigate the Moon.
"I hope to have those contracts signed by the end of the year," said Eric Anderson, Space Adventures' president and CEO.
I'd go, but I'm a few bucks shy of the ticket price. Maybe if I put up a special PayPal button . . . .
The most fundamental duty of the federal courts is to overrule and remedy governmental violations of the Constitution. In some cases, an award of damages is the only adequate remedy available, or even the only possible remedy of any kind. Consider, for example, the case of an innocent man victimized by an unconstitutional search or seizure. The standard remedy of the exclusionary rule is useless to him - at least if he is going to be acquitted anyway. The only feasible way to compensate him for the violation of his rights is an award of damages.
In some cases, other remedies are available, but they are not sufficient to fully remedy the violation of the victim's rights. The Wilkie majority opinion concedes (and Thomas and Scalia do not dispute) that this was true in Wilkie itself. In such situations, it is axiomatic that the courts have a duty to provide a remedy that fully compensates the victim for the violation of his constitutional rights. Any other approach is both unjust to the victim and provides poor incentives for the government by allowing it to avoid bearing the full cost of its actions.
Justices Thomas and Scalia seem to believe that judicial decisions ordering a damages remedy somehow constitute judicial policymaking in a way that decisions ordering other kinds of remedies do not. I agree that damage remedies are sometimes unwise and often inferior to other available remedies. However, I don't see why a damage remedy is inherently more "activist" or more intrusive on the powers of the political branches than alternative remedies such as injunctive relief or facial invalidation of a statute - remedies that Thomas and Scalia consider to be perfectly legitimate. In many cases, an injunction or invalidation of a statute will actually constrain the political branches more than damage payments do.
By all appearances, we need more remedies for illegal conduct by officials. And if damages are inappropriate, Congress can always legislate an appropriate scheme.
EVAN COYNE MALONEY'S FRIEND STUART BROWNING is supposed to be on Fox in a minute, talking about his film on the Canadian healthcare system, and Michael Moore's film on the American healthcare system.
I just caught Newt Gingrich while I was waiting -- he was there to flog his new novel, but wound up talking mostly about the immigration bill defeat, which he said was a victory for every GOP candidate except John McCain. Er, and Sam Brownback, I guess, but Newt probably forgot him, as most people seem to have . . . .
ALLAH LOOKS AT THE IMMIGRATION VOTES IN ORDER and discovers a pattern. Plus, Sam Brownback voted for it before he voted against it: "Sam Brownback turned out to be the weaseliest 'no' vote of all. He voted yes right at the very beginning, during the alphabetical vote, probably thinking that cloture was going to pass. Then, when it died, he switched to a no. I almost wish he was pulling more than 1% in the presidential polls so we could hammer him into oblivion with that. As it is, I’ve captured his moment of shame for posterity on video."
A government spokesman guaranteed the safety of Chinese exports on Thursday in a rare direct commentary on rising international fears over Chinese products. . . .
The statement was among Beijing's most public assertions of the safety of its exports since they came under scrutiny earlier this year with the deaths of dog and cats in North America blamed on Chinese wheat gluten tainted with the chemical melamine.
Since then, U.S. authorities have turned away or recalled toxic fish, juice containing unsafe color additives and popular toy trains decorated with lead paint.
Still, it's nice to see that they're taking the problem seriously.
"HOUSE REPUBLICANS CHOOSE MONEY OVER MAJORITY:" Robert Bluey has an unflattering take on the Congressional pay raise.
UPDATE: On the other hand, you have to give them credit for standing up against a Fairness Doctrine renewal. Rep. Obey's slamming of alt-media is pretty self-serving, given the pasting he's taken over pork lately.
SCORE ONE FOR ALT-MEDIA: Immigration bill fails. "The bill's Senate supporters fell 14 votes short of the 60 needed to limit debate and clear the way for final passage of the legislation, which critics assailed as offering amnesty to illegal immigrants. The vote was 46 to 53 in favor of limiting the debate." That's a big margin.
I think it was the YouTube campaign that made the difference.
UPDATE: Mickey Kaus modestly foregoes credit, but observes: "Fifteen Dems (plus Sanders) vote against cloture, making it somewhat difficult for Sen. Reid to achieve what seemed to be his unadvertised dream: A failed bill he could blame on the Republicans." Plus, why Rupert Murdoch is a loser.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Minute-by-minute coverage of what went on while I was taking the Insta-Daughter to the doctor and the mall.
God bless those legal immigrants. they went through the paperwork. They studied hard. Many had to learn a new language. They showed a commitment to a nation that most of us take for granted.
Yes. The anger over the bill was never so much over immigration, as it was over the contempt that many of the political class seemed to display regarding people who -- to coin a political phrase -- work hard and play by the rules. Those crafting another bill at some point in the future would do well to bear that in mind. [LATER: Prof. Joseph Olson emails: "Congressmen neither work hard nor play by the rules. There is no reason to expect them to respect those who do." Ouch. But that's not fair -- they do work pretty hard, actually.]
More: "Today's defeat of the Senate amnesty bill was more than a run-of-the-mill legislative victory, representing as it did a self-organizing public's defeat of combined force of Big Business, (some of) Big Labor, Big Media, Big Religion, Big Philanthropy, Big Academia, and Big Government." Wow. Somebody should write a book about this phenomenon.
MORE: On legal immigration, a reader emails:
I’m a professor in California and my wife holds a masters degree in accounting. We’ve already spent thousands getting work permits. We’re now in the process of applying for green cards … they’ve make it so complicated you can’t reasonably do it without legal help, and all up (legal fees plus government filing fees), it’s costing us over $9000 for my wife and I to apply for Green Cards. On July 30th, they’re increasing the filing fees. Currently it’s $940 for me and $740 for my wife. Come August, it’ll cost $2200 for the main applicant and $1725 for the spouse. On top of that, they wouldn’t let me pay tax as a married person until I’d been in the country for 10 months, so not only was there no “tax amnesty” for me, I was in fact paying more taxes than an American in the same position. I find Americans are always shocked when I tell them how much it is costing us. It seems like every few months they make it more difficult for people who want to do it legally.
Tellingly, he asks that I not use his name for fear of retaliation.
MORE STILL: Reader Christopher Fox is worried: "Great, we dumped the immigration bill. Success! Now we have to watch out for retribution by a vengeful Congress looking to put us in our place. Don't be surprised when all pretense of border controls are dropped, as the elites decide to show us how bad it can REALLY get if we don't do it their way."
That would be amazingly stupid. Which, based on past performance, suggests that it's hardly out of the question . . . .
Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin got his long overdue comeuppance in the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. The court ruled the senator is not above criticism before an election, no matter what law Feingold may author.
And three justices even reminded him that Wisconsin is not Morocco. . . . A key provision of this "reform" is a restriction on political ads just before an election.
Oh, not on the ads of the politicians. Senators can run all the TV ads their fat-cat supporters are willing to buy.
No, the politicians restricted what ads the citizenry may run on TV before an election.
This "campaign reform" is like a drunk "curing" his alcoholism by telling his wife she cannot imbibe.
I hope that there's a lot of publicity in this vein, as I fear we're about to see another bipartisan effort by the inhabitants of Incumbistan to shut down criticism.
JUST BACK FROM IRAQ, J.D. JOHANNES HAS A COLUMN ON RICHARD LUGAR: "Is it possible to win a war on the ground, and lose it in Congress?"
Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) will recuse himself should the House ethics committee review Rep. John Murtha’s (D-Pa.) earmark activities. . . .
Doyle is a longtime ally of Murtha, the dean of the Pennsylvania delegation. They also share some campaign contributors; many lobbying firms that donate heavily to Murtha and whose clients are recipients of millions of dollars in earmarks from him are also among Doyle’s top contributors.
Murtha’s relationship with the two lobbying firms, KSA Consulting and the PMA Group, came into question on Monday following a report about earmarks he obtained for the firms’ clients.
Stay tuned.
THE POLITICO: "The bitter fight over a comprehensive immigration overhaul has pushed President Bush and his fellow Republicans to the brink of divorce -- and, for the first time, the opportunities for reconciliation appear severely limited."
Positive spin: This is so suicidal, Bush must be acting out of conviction!
MEXICAN IMMIGRATION: A problem that will solve itself?
There has been a stunning decline in the fertility rate in Mexico, which means that, in a few years there will not be many teenagers in Mexico looking for work in the United States or anywhere else. If this trend in the fertility rate continues, Mexico will resemble Japan and Italy - rapidly aging populations with too few young workers to support the economy.
MORE ON MOLLOHAN: "A $1 million earmark request by Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) would allow the Interior Department to expand a wilderness area neighboring properties the Congressman owns."
“There’s an elephant in the room, and it is you,” PETA president Ingrid Newkirk wrote in a letter to Moore.
Maybe his next work will be Downsize Me after all . . . .
ANOTHER UPDATE: Tim Blair notes that for someone who cares about animals, Ingrid Newkirk seems rather ignorant: "As it happens, elephants are vegetarians."
READER TOM BROSZ ON THE IPHONE: "Give me a call when they make one you can drop on the sidewalk, carry in your pocket with keys and change, or plop it into a tide pool (done this), without destroying it. Only in recent months have Verizon and others finally started selling "ruggedized" phones. Years overdue, IMO."
Good point.
June 27, 2007
A RALPH BAKSHI ENDING to the Harry Potter series? I'd love that, actually, but I imagine a lot of other people wouldn't.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board warns that the immigration debate threatens to make the GOP a minority party. They're right. It splits the Republicans right down the middle, demoralizes the base in advance of 2008, and is prompting a conservative counter-mobilization that could make Latinos a Democratic constituency for years to come.
Ironically, the issue was not pushed to the top of the legislative agenda by Democrats. As John B. Judis points out, Democrats haven't been able to push through any legislation that splits Republicans and forces a Bush veto (for now, at least, GOP party loyalty is too strong to overcome a filibuster).
Instead, Bush has been doing the Democrats' work for them.
Yes, this is why it seems so odd to me that they would do this -- particularly as it's also hurting them with supporters they'll soon need on the war. if Bush loses on the bill, it's a big loss with lots of collateral damage. If he wins, it may be even worse.
HERE'S A CHRONOLOGY OF attacks on the oil industry in Nigeria. Plus this: "Gunmen have kidnapped the three-year-old son of a lawmaker in southern Nigeria's Rivers State, the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reported on Wednesday."
IT'S NOT PAY FOR PERFORMANCE: "Despite record-low approval ratings, House lawmakers Wednesday voted to accept an approximately $4,400 pay raise that will increase their salaries to almost $170,000. . . . The pay raise would also apply to the vice president - who is president of the Senate - congressional leaders and Supreme Court justices."
UPDATE: An alternative proposal from Keith Milby: "I propose we pay them say $2,000 multiplied by their average approval rating. So according to the Real Clear Politics average congressional ratings, which is currently 25% that would be approximately $50,000."
COMPETING CLOCKS ON IRAQ: "the military clock in Baghdad, the Iraqi government clock, and the US political clock in Washington." Biggest strategic bind: "the U.S. political cycle."
Every industrialized country relies on satellites every day, for everything from computer networking technology to telecommunications, navigation, weather prediction, television and radio. This makes satellites especially vulnerable targets. Imagine the U.S. military suddenly without guidance for its soldiers and weapons systems, and its civilians without storm warnings or telephones.
Some satellites, however, are at greater risk than others. Most spacecraft — including spy sats — are in low Earth orbit, which stretches 1240 miles into space. As the Chinese test proved, such targets could be hit with medium-range missiles tipped with crude kill devices. GPS satellites are far higher, orbiting at about 12,600 miles. Many communications sats are in the 22,000-mile range. Destroying them requires a much more powerful and sophisticated long-range ballistic missile — yet it can be done. "You'd need a sky-sweeping capability to comprehensively negate a space support system that is scattered all over," says John Pike, a space analyst at GlobalSecurity.org. "You'd need ICBM-size boosters — hundreds of them."
Such an all-out satellite war would render space useless for decades to come. "There'd be so much debris up there," Clark says, "that it wouldn't be safe to put anything up in space."
CHINA DEVELOPS A BAD BRAND IMAGE: "As a country develops and moves up the consumer supply chain, they generally acquire a reputation for making high-quality goods (think Japan and South Korea). What's interesting is that China seems to be moving in the opposite direction."
Virtually everything important that is happening with respect to the immigration bill seems to be happening under the surface, away from the eyes of prying journalists and concerned citizens. The procedural maneuvering is incomprehensible. The substance of the amendments before the Senate is extraordinarily difficult if not overwhelming given the limited time allowed for their consideration.
I have only my intuition to go on. My intuition tells me that it is impossible to be cynical enough about what is transpiring here.
And why is intuition important? Lack of information. Here's a comment from an open thread at the Volokh Conspiracy:
The problem as I see it, is that most of us don't really understand the bill all that well. And Congress is really to blame for that - my impression is that it was not drafted out in the open, it is quite large, and amendments are not welcome. Plus, it seems like it is being rushed, possibly because the more that the people know what's in it, the more they are likely to complain.
Indeed. And some thoughts from Rich Hailey: Read the whole thing.
CHENEY'S OFFICE SEEMS TO HAVE ABANDONED the claim that he's actually a legislator.
WALT MOSSBERG TRIED THE IPHONE FOR TWO WEEKS and liked it pretty well. And to my surprise, the lack of tactile feedback didn't matter to him: "The iPhone's most controversial feature, the omission of a physical keyboard in favor of a virtual keyboard on the screen, turned out in our tests to be a nonissue, despite our deep initial skepticism. After five days of use, Walt -- who did most of the testing for this review -- was able to type on it as quickly and accurately as he could on the Palm Treo he has used for years."
On the other hand, there's a major drawback: you're stuck with AT&T cell service.
It’s the birthday of Rudy “Rudolph” Perpich, governor of Minnesota. Among his notable accomplishments: he sent the National Guard to calm down the bitter Spam Strike of 1986, and he signed the law that bumped the drinking age up to 21. It’s a cliché, yes, but it’s still a reasonable argument: if the state will trust you to herd strikers with a rifle when you’re 18, why won’t they trust you with a beer?
Why, indeed? If anyone actually cared about the youth vote, they'd back a rollback in the drinking age.
The Glenn and Helen Show: Austin Bay and Jim Dunnigan on Iraq and America
The surge is well underway, Baqubah is under assault, Anbar is mostly pacified, and while people in iraq seem somewhat more optimistic, American politicians are getting increasingly wobbly. Meanwhile, we're seeing assassinations and riots in Iran. What's going on, and what should we expect in coming months?
We talk to Jim Dunnigan, publisher of StrategyPage.com and author of numerous books on war, intelligence and security, and Austin Bay, who blogs at AustinBay.net, and who is the author of both novels and nonfiction works on war and military matters. They provide their always-interesting take on what's going on, and what's likely to happen next in Iraq and Iran.
You can listen directly -- no downloading needed -- by going here and clicking on the gray Flash player. You can download the file and listen at your leisure by clicking right here, and you can get a lo-fi version suitable for dialup by going here and choosing the lo-fi version. Plus, you can always subscribe for free via iTunes, which is what all the cool kids do.
This podcast is brought to you by Volvo USA -- buy a Volvo and tell 'em it's all because of the Glenn and Helen Show!
HIGH INSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS: So I emailed my Associate Dean that I'm now up to #11 on the Social Science Research Network list of top legal scholars. His response: "Most excellent, but head for single digits."
What Feinstein really wants is for federal bureaucrats to decide what political opinion programming we should hear. She presumes to know better than listeners what is “fair.” . . . What is especially revealing about these trial balloons for renewed regulation of political speech is that America already has an incredible diversity of media giving vent to opinion and commentary on every conceivable issue in public policy. Thanks to the Internet, America is in the midst of an unprecedented political news and commentary explosion. Anybody with an opinion can start a blog that can be read by anyone in the world with an Internet connection. There are literally millions of political blogs, podcasts, video blogs and blog-based radio operations providing analyses from every conceivable ideological position.
Political expression in America is being liberated as has never before been done in human history. Why does that bother Feinstein, Boxer, Clinton, Kucinich and other Fairness Doctrine advocates?
Read the whole thing.
IN THE NEW YORK TIMES, something positive: "It is a measure of soaring Kurdish optimism that government officials here talk seriously about one day challenging Dubai as the Middle East’s main transportation and business hub. The Kurdistan Regional Government is betting that it can, investing $325 million in a modern terminal at the Erbil International Airport to handle, officials hope, millions of passengers a year, and a three-mile runway that will be big enough for the new double-decker Airbus A380."
THE IMMIGRATION AMENDMENTS ARE ONLINE in searchable format, courtesy of N.Z. Bear.
IS TEHRAN BURNING? People are certainly unhappy. Video and photos at the link.
Never water your lawn in the night, or you will get cramps and drown. No – you’ll get mushrooms. That’s it. Fungal surprises will pop out of your lawn with such force that clods of dirt will strike you in the face.
Well, I didn't water my lawn at night, but it rained and sure enough, I got mushrooms. But they look kind of cool.
And if I've got mushrooms in my lawn, is that a sign that the drought is over?
MARK STEYN: "There's something creepy about a political class so determined to impose a vast transformative bill cooked up backstage in metaphorically smoke-filled rooms on a nation that doesn't want it. It's an affront to republican government and quasi-European in its disdain for the citizenry."
Yes, the unwillingness even to seriously argue the merits is the most disturbing aspect. But close behind is the GOP's willingness to alienate its base at a time when -- you'd think -- the exigencies of the war would dictate the opposite.
UPDATE: Ron Coleman: "What a squandered, ugly moment."
June 26, 2007
FINE ART from Paris Hilton. Well, art. Well, a drawing, anyway.
NEWT GINGRICH: The West is losing World War IV. "The source of failure is not to be found in the American people but in the inarticulate and unimaginative leaders all across government who now preside instead of lead."
REPLACING YOUR HIP FRIEND: Beats replacing your hip.
WHERE ARE ALL THE HURRICANES? Staying away until after my vacation, I hope. "Checking the latest map of global sea temperature anomaly, I find the Atlantic Basin looking a little more normal, but coolish conditions continue in the regions of hurricane formation." Fine with me if that lasts a while longer.
RAMMING THE IMMIGRATION BILL THROUGH FASTER THAN ADVERTISED? "Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may be using an 'unprecedented combination of legislative procedures' to push through the controversial Kennedy Immigration Bill - today!"
He couldn't do that if the Republican leadership was determined to stop him. But it's not.
AN ASSASSINATION IN IRAN: "The killing of a senior figure in Iran’s regime, the third in two months, is again downplayed by the country’s authorities."
WHAT SHOULD REPUBLICANS DO as the GOP seems to be committing suicide? I dunno -- saving the GOP isn't my job, and if the Democrats weren't worse on national security I wouldn't mind much. (And the GOP advantage there seems to be shrinking anyway).
But you've got three basic choices: Exit, voice, and loyalty. That is, quit, bitch like hell, or hold your nose and vote.
Problem is, people have been exercising "voice" a lot and it's clear that President Bush, Trent Lott, et al., don't care and aren't listening. So if you don't want to hold your nose, you've got to exit, either to a third party, to a GOP candidate you like, or to another engagement on Election Day -- go fishing, perhaps? I think the GOP's vulnerability to a third party challenge has just gone way up.
Run against them in the primary elections. Or find someone to run and support them.
Jon Bruning is running against Hagel. I sent him a contribution even though I'm not from Nebraska. I will send a contribution to a Trent Lott primary opponent. The same goes for John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and any of the rest of these guys.
R.I.P. G.O.P.: Out in the car I heard a few minutes of Rush Limbaugh talking about the immigration bill moving forward. I think the Republicans' situation is looking pretty grim, and I wonder, what impels them to make such a self-destructive
move? Limbaugh was wondering too.
SOME PERSPECTIVE: I was reading some stuff on the plans for invading Japan at the end of World War II when I ran across this:
Nearly 500,000 Purple Heart medals were manufactured in anticipation of the casualties resulting from the invasion of Japan. To the present date, all the American military casualties of the sixty years following the end of World War II — including the Korean and Vietnam Wars — have not exceeded that number. In 2003, there were still 120,000 of these Purple Heart medals in stock. There are so many in surplus that combat units in Iraq and Afghanistan are able to keep Purple Hearts on-hand for immediate award to wounded soldiers on the field.
And at current rates we'll still be using them for decades. My grandfather fought all across Europe, then got shipped to the Pacific in preparation for invading Japan. He was extremely happy that the war ended without that being necessary.
PARASITES AND PREDATORS: "Predators want to kill you and eat you right there on the veldt. Parasites, by contrast, want to keep you alive, the better to serve as a parasite paradise, a cozy haven where they can grow at their own pace, suckle on your moist, nourishing tissues, multiply their numbers and finally, one way or another, pass those numbers along." Kinda like the difference between, say, terrorists and lobbyists.
ASK DR. HELEN: The Insta-Wife is soliciting your questions for a new advice column.
THE PEOPLE VERSUS THE POWERFUL: Mickey Kaus crows over his YouTube campaign, which has produced "A slew of actual Shrumesque attack ads" He's got links.
Maybe this really is why the folks on Capitol Hill are getting so testy.
UPDATE: Link was wrong before -- fixed now. Sorry.
NEWS FROM CHINA: "For Communist Party officials, their worst nightmare is becoming reality. The new middle class often own their homes, and when property values are threatened by some government policy, these middle class Chinese organize and show their displeasure. There have been several recent mass demonstrations by middle class Chinese, usually protesting efforts to put factories, or other property value destroying facilities, in the middle of newly built middle class communities. Local government officials, who control the local police, find that they cannot just use force to disperse the middle class demonstrators, as they do farmers, or poor, working class protestors. The middle class crowd is better organized, and have useful connections themselves. The middle class have cell phones and Internet access. The middle class also has access to the upper reaches of the Communist Party, which relies on middle class administrators and technocrats, to make things happen. If the middle class turns on the Communist Party, the communists will lose."
But today's China is, in some respects, less socialistic than much of Western Europe, with a moth-eaten social safety net and a wild free-market economy. Students in almost any urban Chinese school can look out their classroom windows and see just about everything but socialism being constructed: high-rise office buildings, shopping malls, movie theaters, luxury apartment buildings, fast-food restaurants, hotels, factories — the whole capitalist panorama.
Socialism is inherently boring, which is why its main enthusiasts are bores themselves people with high boredom thresholds, like professors and politicians.
535 COMMANDERS-IN-CHIEF: Now it's Richard Lugar calling for a new strategy. Maybe we could do something to stop Iranian troops entering Iraq? I don't think he has anything so useful in mind, though.
UPDATE: Fresh back from Iraq, J.D. Johannes posts a wrapup. And he emails that he's got a rant about Senators on the way: "you know, we could have this thing all but won and still declare defeat. That is sickening." Our political class isn't known for bravery or discipline.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Bob Owens casts doubt on the reports of Iranian troops.
MORE: I agree: "Supporters of this bill sell it as a compromise that will heal America’s divisions. I fear it’s quite the reverse. This bill is infuriating the public and undermining faith in government itself. You can see it in the polling on confidence in Congress and the President. If this bill passes, it’s going to aggravate and embitter politics for years to come. Passing a measure over such overwhelming opposition is like slapping the public in the face."
In the strictly controlled media world of communist China, "citizen journalism" is beating a way through censorship, breaking taboos and offering a pressure valve for social tensions.
In one striking example this month, the Internet was largely responsible for breaking open a slave scandal in two Chinese provinces that some local authorities had been complicit in.
A letter posted on the Internet by 400 parents of children working as slaves in brickyards was the trigger for the national press to finally report on the scandal that some rights groups say had been going on for years.
The parents' Internet posting was part of a growing phenomenon for marginalised people in China who can not otherwise have their complaints addressed by the traditional, government-controlled press.
Hey, somebody should write a book about this phenomenon!
A FRIEND AT NASA sends this rather cool picture of the newly-remodeled International Space Station:
NEWS ON THE TALIBAN: "The Taliban has admitted defeat, in their own unique way. In recent media interviews, Taliban spokesmen announced a shift in emphasis to suicide bombings. The Taliban also admitted that the Americans had infiltrated their high command, which led to the death or capture of several senior Taliban officials, and the capture of many lower ranking ones as well. There have also been some prominent defections recently, which the Taliban spokesmen did not want to talk about."
OH NO, ANOTHER GAS CRISIS: "I’ve been watching the price of gas drop all weekend. It seems like it’s adjusted on the hour. I’ll never understand how a load of gas the station bought at a higher price last week can sell for less today. I mean, I can understand why they'd charge more for gas they bought last week at a lower price - they're evil and bad. But this charging less for something they bought at a higher price - it makes no sense."
THEY'RE GETTING KIND OF TESTY in Trent Lott's office: "A hostile woman answered and told me that my opinions were 'my prerogative' and hung up on me without further adieu—-I did not get a 'thank you' or a 'good-bye.'"
They're sounding kind of irritated in Jim Webb's office, too, though it's not clear how he'll vote.
The leaders of Incumbistan would rather not even have to answer the phone. Unless, you know, it's somebody offering them money who's calling. If you want to annoy any Senators, here's the contact list.
UPDATE: Reader Earl Perry writes: "Senator Salazar's office staff Is distinctly crusty these days too. The words are borderline civil as they dismiss you, while the tone is savage. He got a certain amount of crossover Republican support in his first election to the Senate, including mine. He co-sponsored the Iraq pullout requirement, and he’s nuzzling the immigration bill. These are probably wiser moves for an entrenched dinosaur like Teddy Kennedy than for a tenuous upstart. He’ll need a real dolt for an opponent to re-get my vote." Well, the GOP can probably find one of those . . . .
ANOTHER UPDATE: This may account for some of the testiness: "The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 22% of American voters currently favor the legislation. That’s down a point from 23% a couple of weeks ago and down from 26% when the debate in the Senate began. Fifty percent (50%) oppose the Senate bill while 28% are not sure." Yeah, that's kind of how I feel -- the more they argue for it, the less I'm inclined to support it. I'm not sure how much of this is that the bill is stupid and how much is that the arguments (and arguers) are, but I guess it doesn't have to be either/or.
YET ANOTHER UPDATED: Reader Kevin McKinley says they're nicer in person:
I visited Jim Webb's Virginia Beach, VA office yesterday to officially register my opposition to the immigration "reform" resolution.
The staffer there was polite, and volunteered that of all the people who have contacted that office, not a single person had expressed support for the resolution.
She told me Webb does not support it; when I asked her if he would vote for cloture she couldn't tell me.
Sounds like he'd be crazy to vote against cloture, but this is the Senate, so who knows?
MORE: Another report from reader Chris Farley:
I called each office. I could not get through to the DC office – in ten tries, three of them got the “all circuits are busy” message. Capitol Hill must be going nuts.
At the other offices, I told them that I was calling to request that Senator Webb vote “no” to cloture for the immigration bill. I then asked if they knew how the senator planned to vote.
Hampton Roads - a very, very friendly and perky woman answered the phone. She took my name, address, phone and e-mail when I registered my opposition and thanked me for participating in the process. She told me that Senator Webb hasn’t made up his mind yet on how to vote.
Roanoke – a woman answered the phone and tried to get me off as quickly as I could. She was cordial at best. She only took my name. She told me that “we don’t know here but he voted against cloture before so we assume he’ll vote against it this time.”
Richmond – a very young sounding woman answered the phone, told me “okay” when I registered my opinion and also told me that the senator hasn’t made up his mind on how to vote. She didn’t even take my name.
I voted for Webb primarily because I dislike George Allen. So far, I like the concentration Webb has been given to Veteran’s issues, since I’m a veteran myself. But, I’m starting to dislike Senator Webb primarily because of the way his constituent services offices are treating me. Democracy really sucks when the primary driver behind a vote is because you dislike the other candidate. It is a bit depressing.
Most of 'em are depressing, if you look too closely.
STILL MORE: Meryl Yourish emails that the lines are jammed: "I tried calling Jim Webb's DC office. Voicemail is full; line is busy. Same goes for Warner's office. But their local offices are free. So I called to let them know that I do not want them to vote for the amnesty bill."
MY LOCAL PAPER HAS bought my local alt-weekly. It's probably a good business move for them, but it makes Knoxville even more of a one-newspaper town.
UPDATE: Brendan Loy: "Big national developments like Rubert Murdoch’s bid for the WSJ get all the headlines, but it’s the consolidation of ownership and lack of competition in local markets that upsets me most, because local newspapers, TV and radio are the predominant non-Internet news sources for the average person, and the realities of the modern market have robbed them — particularly the newspapers — of the journalistic vitality they once had."
DISCOVER MAGAZINE: "All over the world, no matter what the cultural or language differences, science is more or less guided by scientific principles—except in many Islamic countries, where it is guided by the Koran. This is the ultimate story about science and religion." Excerpt:
The evil West is a common refrain with El-Naggar, who, paradoxically, often appears in a suit and tie, although he is wearing a pale green galabiyya when we meet. He says that he grieves for Western colleagues who spend all their time studying their areas of specialization but neglect their souls; it sets his teeth on edge how the West has “legalized” homosexuality. “You are bringing man far below the level of animals,” he laments. “As a scientist, I see the danger coming from the West, not the East.” . . . El-Naggar even sees moral meaning in the earthquake that triggered the 2005 tsunami and washed away nearly a quarter of a million lives. Plate tectonics and global warming be damned: God had expressed his wrath over the sins of the West. Why, then, had God punished Southeast Asia rather than Los Angeles or the coast of Florida? His answer: Because the lands that were hit had tolerated the immoral behavior of tourists.
Theocracy -- it's not just for John Ashcroft anymore. If it ever actually was. . . .
A CONCRETE TEST of "which presidential candidate cares most for the needs of older and disabled Americans."
AMITY SHLAES on the New Deal. "The incredible rightness of FDR's war policy obscures the flaws in his prior actions."
I haven't read the book, but this is pretty interesting stuff.
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS on why it's stupid to try to satisfy Angry Muslims: "Rage Boy keenly looks forward to anger, while we worriedly anticipate trouble, and fret about etiquette, and prepare the next retreat. If taken to its logical conclusion, this would mean living at the pleasure of Rage Boy, and that I am not prepared to do."
Where does the global human rights movement stand in the seventh year of the 21st century? If the first year of the United Nations Human Rights Council is any indication, it's grown sick and cynical -- partly because of the fecklessness and flexible morality of some of the very governments and groups that claim to be most committed to democratic values.
At a session in Geneva last week, the council -- established a year ago in an attempt to reform the U.N. Human Rights Commission -- listened to reports by special envoys appointed by its predecessor condemning the governments of Cuba and Belarus. It then abolished the jobs of both "rapporteurs" in a post-midnight maneuver orchestrated by its chairman, who announced a "consensus" in spite of loud objections by the ambassador from Canada that there was no such accord.
While ending the scrutiny of those dictatorships, the council chose to establish one permanent and special agenda item: the "human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories." In other words, Israel (or "Palestine," in the council's terminology), alone among the nations of the world, will be subjected to continual and open-ended examination. That's in keeping with the record of the council's first year: Eleven resolutions were directed at the Jewish state. None criticized any other government. . . .
What about Western human rights groups -- surely they cannot accept such a travesty of human rights advocacy? In fact, they can.
It's as if they're a bunch of antisemitic thugs, and their apologists, or something. (Via Harry's Place, where a commenter observes: "Just goes to prove what the long term expenditure of large amounts of Arab oil money can achieve.")
HOWARD KURTZ ON POLITICAL DONATIONS BY THE PRESS: "The scorecard -- 125 of 144 donations to Democrats -- provides fresh ammunition to those who say the press has a liberal tilt. It's hard to argue you don't favor one party when you've just coughed up cash for that party."
But isn't banning those donations just covering up the problem? It's really a failure of diversity.
In April 2004, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) celebrated the groundbreaking for a gleaming new office building here, designed around its anchor tenant, a Rockville, Md.-based technology company called Aeptec Microsystems.
Murtha pursued millions of dollars worth of legislative earmarks for the company, and Aeptec’s federal contracts blossomed after it opened a branch in his district in 2001, rising from about $13 million in 2000 to $45.6 million in 2003 and $33 million in 2004, according to fedspending.org, a database of federal contracts. The company had been represented by two lobbying firms with close ties to Murtha: KSA Consulting and the PMA Group.
But Aeptec never moved into the Indiana building, which was built mostly with state and local development funds and remains mostly empty after opening last month. The company, also known as 3eTI, instead moved its staff of about 15 people into a nondescript office park across town, where its name is not even posted on the outside door. It has since been bought by Texas-based EFJ Inc.
Aeptec’s story is not unique. Murtha has obtained millions of dollars in earmarks for firms in his district, many of them clients of PMA and KSA. But in many cases the money is not for local companies, it is for companies that move to the district, and frequently it is for start-ups that essentially would not be in business were it not for Murtha’s largesse. Some of the firms also are simply store-front offices of companies that do most of their work elsewhere.
Jeez.
MORE ON POTENTIAL LAMAR ALEXANDER CHALLENGER Mike McWherter. Hmm. Didn't Lamar become less friendly to the immigration bill about the time people started talking about this?
I'VE LINKED BEFORE TO STUDIES showing that circumcision reduces AIDS risk. But here's a new report suggesting that it's more complicated than that:
Male circumcision, which had previously been found to lessen the risk of contracting HIV, is largely irrelevant, suggests a new study. Rather, it is the number of prostitutes in a country that determines the spread of HIV infections, says researcher John R. Talbott, in the journal PLoS ONE.
After conducting statistical empirical research across 77 countries, Talbot contends that prostitute communities are typically very highly infected with the virus, and because of the large number of sex partners they have each year, can act as an "engine" driving infection rates to unusually high levels in the general population.
He adds that while male circumcision may indeed reduce the risk of transmission by around 50 percent in each sexual encounter, reducing single encounter transmission rates alone cannot control the epidemic. Why? Because individuals in highly infected countries have multiple contacts with the infected, so reducing transmission rates only defers the inevitable.
WAITING FOR SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE: A crime against humanity? It's not enough to have scientific consensus, you have to have it when the politicians think you should have it.
In his new book, "The Assault on Reason," Gore denounces what he sees as today's politics of fear. Yet his own campaign of mass persuasion -- any such campaign -- is not amenable to contradiction and uncertainty. It's about fright and absolutes.
Yes, even the scientific consensus isn't consensus-y enough for Gore.
A REALITY CHECK FOR THE ANTIWAR CROWD: "As an Iraq war veteran who participated in combat operations and political reconciliation efforts, I take issue with some of the arguments repeatedly being made on Capitol Hill. Most recently I was bothered by statements from Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who cited three common antiwar arguments in his June 21 op-ed, 'Lincoln's Example for Iraq,' all of which run counter to realities on the ground in Iraq."
On the evening of the 24th I spoke with a local Iraqi official, Colonel Faik, who said the Muftis would order the severance of the two fingers used to hold a cigarette for any Iraqis caught smoking. Other reports, from here in Diyala and also in Anbar, allege that smokers are murdered by AQI. Most Iraqis smoke and this particular prohibition appeared to have earned the ire of many locals. After an American unit cleared an apartment complex on the 23rd, LTC Smiley, the battalion commander, reported that residents didn’t ask for food and water, but cigarettes. In other parts of Baqubah, people have been celebrating the routing of AQI by lighting up and smoking cigarettes.
Other AQI edicts included beatings for men who refused to grow beards, and corporal punishments for obscene sexual suggestiveness, defined by such “loose” behavior as carrying tomatoes and cucumbers in the same bag. These fatwas were not eagerly embraced by most Iraqis, and the taint traveled back to the Muftis who sat in supreme judgment. Locals, who are increasingly helpful in pointing out and celebrating the downfall of AQI here, said that during the initial Arrowhead Ripper attack the morning of the 19th, AQI murdered five men. Townsend’s men found the buried corpses behind an AQI prison, exactly where they’d been told to look for the group grave. Locals also directed Townsend’s men to a torture house. Peering through a window, American soldiers saw knives, swords, bindings and drills. AQI is well-known for its macabre eagerness to drill into kneecaps, elbows, ribs, skulls, and other parts of victims.
As always, read the whole thing. Only don't tell Mike Bloomberg about the finger-cutting for smokers. It might give him ideas . . . .
UPDATE: This kind of undercuts those lefty bloggers who have been trying to downplay the Al Qaeda presence.
And via email, Michael Yon writes: "The attack continues to unfold here. I'm told that there are reports that the attack in Baqubah is over. If there are such reports, they are untrue."
IMPEACH CHENEY IF YOU WANT, but do bear in mind that he'll preside over his own impeachment trial.
No, really. The Senate has the sole power to try impeachments. The Vice President is the President of the Senate. He presides. The Constitution provides for only one exception in cases of impeachment: "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside." That's because of the obvious conflict-of-interest of having the VP preside when the President is tried. But there's no similar provision for having someone else preside if the Vice President is impeached.
Presumably that's because no one could imagine a Vice President doing anything significant enough to warrant impeachment, which was certainly an accurate reflection of the office's character for the first two centuries or so of our nation's history. And it's another argument against the VP being given extensive executive responsibilities, now that I think of it.
MEGAN MCARDLE: "I find the argument that the problem with immigrants is illegal immigration pretty uncompelling. . . . It is far from clear to me that being an illegal alien is a morally wrong, as opposed to legally wrong, act."
I certainly agree that we're talking about malum prohibitum rather than malum in se here. Just like if you don't pay your taxes. But it seems to me that most of the anger out there isn't about the immigrants at all, but about the arrogance of, and the transparently disingenuous arguments made by, Trent Lott and the other folks in Congress and the White House in support of the bill.
UPDATE: Readers wonder if we'll have an amnesty for people who don't pay their taxes? Well, we've seen that kind of thing before, actually. Of course, moral arguments aside there's a good argument that the already-swamped federal immigration bureaucracy can't possibly handle the demands that the immigration bill would impose. And there's the question of assimilation, which to me is most important: We've assimilated big waves of immigrants before, but that was back when the folks in charge of education and government thought assimilation was a good thing -- as we see in Britain, when the dominant ideology is PC-ish and multi-culti, we tend to see a sort of reverse-assimilation instead.
Senate Republicans are squabbling amongst themselves over immigration reform. President Bush is fighting a losing battle with his base. But in the House of Representatives, times couldn’t be better for the GOP.
House Republicans have coalesced around the issue of federal spending, handing Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) a stinging defeat on earmark reform and sending their liberal colleagues a unified message not to exceed the president’s budget requests.
For conservatives who stayed home last Election Day, it’s refreshing to see someone in Washington paying attention again. . . .
What’s most significant about these developments is the way they came about. In both cases, conservative ideas quickly snowballed into party-unifying messages. Boehner and Blunt, both of whom faced challenges from the right for their current leadership posts, have embraced their onetime foes.
Of course, if they'd done this kind of thing a year ago, they might still be in the majority.
MORE CRUSHING OF DISSENT, IN OAKLAND: George Will reports on how something that would have seemed a P.C. reductio ad absurdum a few years ago is now a reality.
FRED THOMPSON AIMING FOR BLOGGER-IN-CHIEF? "While the Internet and blogs are a basic cornerstone of any modern campaign communications strategy, Thompson has been notably enthusiastic about expressing his thoughts online."
WHAT MAKES NIFONG DIFFERENT? "The best way to find out the answer to that question is to continue to pay attention to the abuses of prosecutors. If we can't maintain our attention long enough to see the extent of the problem, then we will know we cared because of the sports and the sex and the race and the elite university."
Yes, I think prosecutors in general deserve more attention.
ANOTHER INCONVENIENT TRUTH: "National parks were born of disasters." Kind of a silly piece, really, but with an interestingly contrarian perspective.
Both the terrorists and U.S. troops know that victory has been defined as several weeks with no bombs going off in Baghdad. The media is keeping score, and they use their ears and video cameras. No loud bangs and no bodies equals no news. That's victory.
Not really. The real war is within the Iraqi government. The terrorists lost two years ago, when the relentless slaughter of Moslem civilians turned the Arab world against al Qaeda. Journalists missed that one, but not the historians. The war in Iraq has always been about Arabs demonstrating that they can run a clean government, for the benefit of all the people, not just the tyrants on top. So far, there have lots of victories and defeats in this, and no clear decision overall. Elections have been held several times, but the people elected have proved to be as corrupt and venal as their tyrannical predecessors. Everyone admits that this bad behavior is not a good thing, but attempts to stop it have been only partially successful. Changing thousands of years of custom and tradition is not easy. The clay tablets dug up in the vicinity of Baghdad, reveal similar scandal and despair over four thousand years ago. Most Iraqis realize, however, that if the chain of corruption is not broken, the dreary past will again become a painful present.
IN the battle for the women’s vote, Fred Thompson has a secret weapon against Hillary Clinton - the legions of former girlfriends who still adore him and who want him to be president.
The Hollywood actor and former Tennessee senator racked up an impressive list of conquests during his swinging bachelor days in the 1990s, but he appears to have achieved the impossible and kept their friendship and respect.