SAY UNCLE CORRECTS WATE-TV on assault weapons hysteria. Somebody needs to have a talk with Knoxville's police chief Sterling Owen, too. Lots of law-abiding citizens -- and voters -- own highfull-capacity weapons. And given the miserable record of my local government lately in handling credit cards, legal obligations of openness, etc., they should show a bit more respect for law-abiding citizens. . . .
UPDATE: Reader John Steakley emails with a correction: "They aren't 'high' capacity. They are 'full' capacity." Excellent point. Correction made.
HEH. I never noticed the resemblance to PeeWee Herman before.
MICHAEL YON: "Unfortunately my concerns for Afghanistan are proving well-placed. Afghanistan and Pakistan are inextricably linked. Together they might be called 'Troublestan.'"
THOUGHTS ON LAW PROFESSORS, HAPPINESS, and distribution curves, from Tom Smith.
BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE I ROCK AND ROLLED: I don't listen to much rock anymore; as James Lileks said a while back, "Techno does for me now what rock used to. Why, I couldn’t care less." But I had to drive across town and popped in a Heart album and it was quite good. Crazy on You is without a doubt the best Cold War-inspired song about oral sex ever. Other tunes held up well, too.
LOOKING BACK at the 2007 Consumer Electronics Show, and what promises came true, and didn't. My reporting from last year's CES is here. And here's that 108" Sharp flat-screen TV they're talking about.
ADVICE: "Barack -- may I call you Barack? -- this is not going to help. Apart from the absurdity of claiming that the housing conditions of one's grandmother amount to foreign policy experience, no Iowan who has been as successful as Barack Obama would let his grandmother live in a 'tiny hut.' Somebody ought to take up a collection for the poor woman."
DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT HISTORY: I linked this review of Jonah Goldberg's book last night, and a reader pointed out that the text reference to Roosevelt's National Recovery Administration contained a hyperlink to articles about the National Rifle Association. The error is still there this afternoon. Despite having the same initials, those are not the same . . . .
I'm sure that mistake is not the fault of David Oshinsky, the reviewer, but rather of some undereducated staffer at the Times, but it serves to illustrate the need for the kind of history lesson Goldberg offers, as well as a point made by many, that the NYT doesn't take its hyperlinks very seriously.
UPDATE: Ouch: "The NYT should be making a conspicuous show of its professionalism and superior resources on the web, but instead it is making mistakes that would mortify me — in my little one-person operation."
The former North Carolina senator labeled "ridiculous" comments made by the Obama campaign that seemed to link former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto's assassination to Sen. Hillary Clinton's vote to authorize the use of force against Iraq, embraced Sen. Barack Obama's politics over Clinton's, and said an anti-Obama flier from a pro-Clinton union was "misleading" and "deceptive."
MICHAEL YOUNG LOOKS FOR NEOCONS IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION and can't seem to find any: "So maybe it's time to stop referring to the neocon policies of the Bush administration. The neocons are gone, many for so long that no one seems to remember their leaving. What we now have in Washington is a mishmash of old political realism and improvisation, topped with increasingly empty oratory on freedom and democracy. That should please quite a few of Bush's domestic critics. He's returned to the futile routine in the Middle East that they always urged him to."
In other words, the bureaucracy won, with predictable results.
December 28, 2007
BENAZIR BHUTTO MAY BE DEAD, but she's got a book coming out entitled Reconciliation: Islam, Democracy, and the West. Interestingly, the Insta-Wife used to babysit for Bhutto's agent, Andrew Wylie. Well, it's interesting to me, anyway.
A YEAR-END DEFENSE OF REBECCA AGUILAR: "It might have something to do with the fact that the shooter is white." [LATER: That link's stopped working. Try this one.]
If Aguilar's behavior was so seemly, then why did KDFW move so quickly to get the video off the Web? (More here, And background here.)
MICKEY KAUS: "Truthchecking the MSM's Truthcheckers."
WHAT? COLONEL SANDERS ISN'T AN ACTUAL COLONEL in the United States Army? Never mind.
THIS SEEMS LIKE A NON-STORY: Giuliani advised the maker of Oxycontin. So what? Yeah, it gets abused -- most drugs do -- but it also provides a lot of people with pain relief. I think the "crusade" against Oxycontin is just more drug-war hysteria, putting Giuliani on the side of the angels here. Well, paid on the side of the angels, but that's as much as you can ask from lawyers in private practice . . . .
GO FIGURE: Traffic on Daily Kos Decreasing As Primaries Approach? Well, Kos has been pretty thoroughly co-opted, and become part of the Democratic establishment himself, which no doubt makes the site seem less fresh and interesting.
UPDATE: An alternate explanation: "Daily Kos is less fresh and interesting than in the past. But that's because Kos hasn't been as active there. He has stretched himself thin by taking on columns for establishment media outlets like Newsweek and The Hill. He's also the father of two children as of April. . . . The Kos brand is languishing because the blogger is the brand and the blogger has more than his blog to feed these days." That's a good point, though of course the two aren't entirely inconsistent.
Meanwhile, Mickey Kaus wonders if it's General Petraeus's fault: "I was at a very nice left-wing party over the holidays and the youthful antiwar types were saying that traffic was down on all the left-wing sites because of ... Iraq. ... That's not what I said. It's what they said. ... Iraq just isn't as salient now that it doesn't seem to be spiraling into apocalypse. . . . Of course, some right-wing sites seem to be experiencing a mild decline since August also. Maybe the whole blogosphere was about Iraq!" Hmm. InstaPundit traffic is up considerably since August. But then, InstaPundit has a somewhat broader focus than just politics and Iraq. Come for the war, stay for the nanotechnology! And the gadgets! And the science fiction recommendations! And the podcasts . . . .
HEIL, WOODROW! That's the title of David Oshinsky's surprisingly positive review of Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism in Sunday's New York Times. Excerpt:
Coming of age in the 1960s, I heard the word “fascist” all the time. College presidents were fascists, Vietnam War supporters were fascists, policemen who tangled with protesters were fascists, on and on. To some, the word smacked of Hitler and genocide. To others, it meant the oppression of the masses by the privileged few. But one point was crystal clear: the word belonged to those on the political left. It was their verbal weapon, and they used it every chance they got. . . .
Leftists still drop the “f word” to taint their opponents, be they global warming skeptics or members of the Moral Majority. The sad result, Goldberg says, is that Americans have come to equate fascism with right-wing political movements in the United States when, in fact, the reverse is true. To his mind, it is liberalism, not conservatism, that embraces what he claims is the fascist ideal of perfecting society through a powerful state run by omniscient leaders. And it is liberals, not conservatives, who see government coercion as the key to getting things done.
“Liberal Fascism” is less an exposé of left-wing hypocrisy than a chance to exact political revenge. Yet the title of his book aside, what distinguishes Goldberg from the Sean Hannitys and Michael Savages is a witty intelligence that deals in ideas as well as insults — no mean feat in the nasty world of the culture wars.
Read the whole thing. Our podcast interview with Jonah is here.
BLOOMBERG GROUP RUNS anti-gun ad in Iowa. Dan Riehl comments: "If that's the first card Bloomberg has decided to play, his entry into the race is bound to help the Republican candidate more than anything else."
CALLING FOR A 2008 SCIENCE DEBATE. Sounds like a good idea to me. And through the page, I notice that my former Tennessee colleague Stuart Pimm is one of the organizers.
Mike Huckabee last year accepted $52,000 in speaking fees from a bio-tech giant that wants to research human embryonic stem cells, a non-profit working to expand access to the morning after pill and a group pushing to study whether tightening gun control laws will reduce violence.
UPDATE: Oops, I misread that. They were "special groups," not special ops -- Iranian-backed militias. Was a bit rushed this morning as we were getting ready to return home from Atlanta, where the Insta- wife and daughter were hitting the after-Christmas sales. Or trying to, as a lot of stuff was sold out.
Almost as depressing, however, was this photo of air travel as it used to be. Sigh.
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: Investor's Business Daily tells Bush not to be shy:
The Congressional Research Service issued a report last week confirming that earmarks not included in the actual bill but written into accompanying reports — which is most of them — do not have force of law and can therefore be disregarded by the president. . . .
But don't just blame Democrats. This out-of-control, unaccountable waste and abuse of the citizens' hard-earned money is a bipartisan disgrace. Byrd's Republican counterpart on the spending panel, Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, out-oinked even Byrd, with $774 million in earmarks. So did Alaska's Sen. Ted Stevens, infamous for the taxpayer-funded Bridge To Nowhere and responsible for $502 million in earmarks this time around.
Not only would the president have the Constitution on his side if he declared war on the earmark racket; he would have the vast majority of Americans with him. Most people are tired of finding out after the fact that they've paid for billions of dollars in projects that should have been locally financed — or maybe not built at all — due to the 11th-hour stratagems.
SAY IT AIN'T SO, RON: "Yes, I know I wrote an article tentatively supporting Ron Paul, but please, someone, tell me this clip in which Dr. Ron Paul rejects the theory of evolution has been edited to remove the full context of the remark."
As they mourn and try to recover from the shock of the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistanis are trying to come to terms with the security failure that allowed such a carefully coordinated shooting-suicide bombing to take place, and asking themselves if it was, indeed, a failure —or a conspiracy.
Neither answer is a good one. Even if there was no government–approved conspiracy to eliminated her, the fact remains that Bhutto was presumably being protected by the tightest security possible. Pakistanis ask themselves if someone of her stature is so vulnerable, how can a common person be safe in their home?
The feeling of insecurity and uncertainty combines with the general atmosphere of sadness and mourning. Bhutto’s supporters and even those who would not have voted for her are expressing their sympathy for her and her family.
The sadness is quickly transforming into anger.
Read the whole thing.
ABE FOXMAN: "We welcome and accept Will Smith's statement that Hitler was a 'vicious killer' and that he did not mean for his remarks about the Nazi leader to be mistaken as praise."
PEOPLE USING INTERNET EXPLORER were having trouble opening the Pajamas Media Straw Poll to the right. I fixed the coding problem and it should work for you now. Please vote!
COULD AN UNTRAINED PERSON LAND A JETLINER IN AN EMERGENCY? I could, but only if I could plug in a keyboard and mouse, and run Flight Simulator . . . .
IS THE U.S. LIKE ROME? Carter Wood says no, and adds: "Besides, everyone knows it was overtaxation that caused Rome's fall."
A FINAL SOLUTION TO THE REDNECK PROBLEM. Jeez. (Via Hot Air). Call me crazy, but I doubt that the forced migration of millions from Texas and Mississippi to the East Coast would result in liberal nirvana . . . .
The Glenn and Helen Show: Jonah Goldberg on Hillary, Huckabee, and Liberal Fascism
It's sure to make a splash, and it's already got some left bloggers in a tizzy even though it doesn't come out until next week. It's Jonah Goldberg's new book, Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning. The title comes from H.G. Wells, and the history won't be news to people who've paid attention -- which means it will be news to a lot of people -- but Goldberg has a lot to say about the "progressive" roots of both socialism and fascism and the way they're reflected in contemporary politics. (He goes out of his way to make clear, though, that he's not saying liberals are fascists.) Plus, thoughts on the Hillary and Huckabee candidacies.
You can listen to the show directly -- no downloads needed -- by going right here and clicking on the gray Flash player. You can download the whole file and listen at your leisure by clicking right here, and you can get a lo-fi version suitable for dialup by going here and selecting "lo fi." And, of course, you can always get a free subscription from iTunes if you like -- and why wouldn't you? Show archives are at GlennandHelenShow.com.
It's no front-page news that Iraq is a dangerous place. But a capital magnet? The presses have stopped for less. According to the not-quite-closed record book for 2007, Iraqi sovereign bonds, the Iraqi currency, and the Iraqi stock market have each logged astounding, not to mention politically provocative, gains.
Not many would have predicted that Iraq's long-dated, dollar-denominated debt would have proven a safe haven during a worldwide credit crisis. But the 5.8s of 2038 did just that. Since the subprime mortgage meltdown began in August, these evidences of indebtedness of the government in Baghdad have gained no less than 18.3%.
Interesting. I seem to recall someone arguing last summer that the surge wasn't working, based on the performance of Iraqi financial instruments. I wonder if they'll revisit that argument now.
DAVE HARDY: "47 Senators have requested that Interior Department modify its regulations to allow [gun] carrying in National Parks. Since National Parks are often large, thinly populated with LEOs, and frequently contain wildlife that may think that humans taste very good, it seems like a plan to me."
"It's a shortcut and I shouldn't have done it," Officer Daniel Pratt said in his recent testimony, before apologizing on the stand.
When asked by defense attorney Mary Carey why police officers aren't supposed to cut and paste, he responded: "For the obvious reasons of mistakes and every statement is individual."
Carey said, "I'm absolutely appalled that the person who we trust to be honest would present evidence in an official document that was false. "The fact that there's history in that department presenting falsified police reports makes me extremely worried of the propriety of any reports coming out of that department."
"It's impossible to know whether it's one bad apple or a culture of fraud and deceit," she said.
I can see why people do it, but I can also see why people don't like it.
MUCH MORE ON THE BENAZIR BHUTTO ASSASSINATION, including statements from various Presidential candidates, at The Corner.
ANOTHER UPDATE: At the Huckabee post linked above, an update with this from the Huckabee campaign: "Gov. Huckabee while speaking at a campaign event earlier this morning in Florida intended to extend his deepest sympathies to the people of Pakistan when he used the word 'apologies.' He is outraged and saddened by the attack and the loss of a world leader whose life he believes was a profile in courage."
AL SHARPTON, STILL RELEVANT? "The piece remains mysteriously congratulatory, given the low batting average Sharpton boasts on peaceful, lasting resolution of such conflicts." Gee, you think?
Ms. Bhutto was killed at a campaign rally just two weeks before a Pakistani election. It is worth remembering as we begin our own campaign season in earnest next week that no matter how acrimonious the political discussion becomes, we live in a country where those who root for the death of their political opponents exist far outside the mainstream and that even if an assassination attempt were to occur here, there is zero risk of anything but an orderly transition of power on January 20, 2009.
MARK WARNER emails that he's trying to get 1500 new donors before the end of the year. Our podcast interview with him can be heard here. I don't know much about his Republican opponent, Jim Gilmore.
MICKEY KAUS: "Are you impressed with a drop in home values of 6.6% over a year? It doesn't seem like such a big correction, given the dramatic run-up in prices over the last decade or so. ... And don't declining prices make housing more... what's the word? ... affordable?"
The National Rifle Association has hired private investigators to find hundreds of people whose firearms were seized by city police in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, according to court papers filed this week.
The NRA is trying to locate gun owners for a federal lawsuit that the lobbying group filed against Mayor Ray Nagin and Police Superintendent Warren Riley over the city's seizure of firearms after the Aug. 29, 2005, hurricane.
In the lawsuit, the NRA and the Second Amendment Foundation claim the city violated gun owners' constitutional right to bear arms and left them "at the mercy of roving gangs, home invaders, and other criminals" after Katrina.
MARK STEYN: "I don't accept that free-born Canadian citizens need the permission of the Canadian state to read my columns. What's offensive is not the accusations of Dr Elmasry and his pals, but the willingness of Canada's pseudo-courts to take them seriously. . . . This morning I spent 20 minutes mulling over a couple of offers for overseas rights to America Alone from the Islamic world. It seems that Muslim publishers from Turkey to Indonesia are more robust than Osgoode Hall law students. What a sad comment on the decayed Dominion." And on Osgoode Hall law students.
UPDATE: I've mentioned it before, but if you want to support Steyn you might buy a copy of his book and send it to:
Canadian Human Rights Commission
344 Slater Street, 8th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1E1, Canada
Telephone: (613) 995-1151
Toll Free: 1-888-214-1090
TTY: 1-888-643-3304
Fax: (613) 996-9661
JONATHAN ADLER: "The Dallas-based Institute for Creation Research is seeking state approval to train science teachers. This is one of those ideas that should be left on the shelf, right next to Lynne Spears' book on parenting."
Plus, debating creation vs. evolution in the comments. More support for creationism than I'd have expected there.
SOME RANDOM THOUGHTS ABOUT THE CANDIDATES: People want to know who I endorse, or who I'd vote for. I don't do endorsements -- I think they're presumptuous in newspapers, and I'd feel silly telling people how they should vote at this point. Most of my readers probably know more than me anyway. But since people keep asking, here are some thoughts. Since they're kind of long, click "read more" to read them.
Fred Thompson: I like him. And he's a home-state guy.. He's run a pretty substantive, issue-oriented campaign if you actually read his position statements. Not many people have, though. And that's part of the problem. I've dealt with his campaign behind the scenes trying to set up podcast interviews, etc., and while they're nice folks, and things seem to have gotten better, it seemed to me this summer that he was failing at the key task of a President: Putting together a good team and getting it to run smoothly. I know enough about management skills to recognize their importance, and Fred hasn't been displaying those enough. Otherwise I probably would have signed on to "Law Professors for Fred," as Eugene Volokh, Jonathan Adler, et al., have done. I see what attracts them, but I still have my concerns. Sometimes I think he's been running for VP all along -- in which case he's actually run a terrific campaign . . . .
Romney: Loads of management skills. Not so much on the other stuff. Some of his positions are okay -- his abortion/stem cell squishiness, which bothers a lot of Republicans, is okay with me -- but he's bad on Second Amendment issues and though he's trying to talk a better game I don't know how much I believe him. My friends in Massachusetts seem to like him regardless of their political stripe, which is a mark in his favor. He comes across as a bit too rehearsed and polished, and that puts me off, although if he were really a faker I guess he'd be better at faking sincerity, too . . . .
McCain: It's easy to see why the press loves him. He's engaging, always finds something flattering to say to you, and really does give pretty good answers to questions. He's been great on the war and national security, and he's excellent on Second Amendment issues. It's hard for me to forgive him on campaign finance reform. Immigration isn't a big issue of mine, but I'm sometimes offended by the doubletalk of pro-amnesty folks, and McCain hasn't been Mr. Straight Talk on that subject. Managerial skills? Well, he can run a campaign. But he's never been much of an executive otherwise.
Huckabee: He was very engaging when we talked to him -- he's a likable guy -- but the more I know about him the more I realize he's pretty much my opposite on every issue except the Second Amendment. He's basically a big-government liberal on social issues, a Carteresque talk-talker on national security, and a nanny-stater in general. I'd be strongly tempted to vote for Hillary over Huckabee, as she's not much worse on domestic issues, and would probably be more strongly checked by Congressional Republicans, and I think she'd be better on national security. Governors are supposed to have executive skills, and I think that Huckabee actually does. Some question of whether Arkansas political culture lends itself to honest open government at the federal level, though. Prior experience suggests otherwise . . . .
Giuliani: Great on national security, and also someone with some management skills. Bad on Second Amendment issues, though he's made a slightly more convincing shift than Romney on that subject. Also, alas, a nanny-stater -- here's my post on his absurd stand against sparklers -- though I don't know how much of that would play out at the national level. While the financial scandals aimed at him have so far seemed overblown, I worry a bit.
Ron Paul: My thoughts on Ron Paul, good and bad, are here. At any rate, I don't see him as a viable nominee.
Hillary Clinton: Downsides: Nannyish -- almost Nurse Ratched-ish -- view of government. Arkansas politics. Most polarizing figure in the race. Upsides: A grownup. Almost certainly better than Obama, Richardson, Edwards, Huckabee, or Paul on national security. (Plus, this upside) On the other hand, hasn't handled pressure well in the campaign. There's a lot more pressure when you're actually President.
Obama: Appealing guy. Smart. No management experience. No foreign policy expertise, producing a tendency to say dumb things. (One of my Muslim students liked him until he started talking about nuking Pakistan -- now she's deadset against him.) My feeling is that he's a guy who would be a great candidate in 4-8 years, who hit the race a bit too early. He might still be a good President, but I'd be worried, especially in the first couple of years, that he'd make a costly major miscue. Also, while he talks a good game, I think he's really about as much a nanny as Hillary. Upside: Handles pressure better than Hillary, based on recent events.
Edwards: I thought he was strong in 2004 -- in fact, I thought an Edwards/Kerry ticket would have been better than Kerry/Edwards. The John Edwards of this campaign cycle seems prone to unforced errors, though, from the expensive house, to the bad campaign hires, to . . . well, almost everytime he's in the news it's some sort of mistake. Even my yellow-dog Democrat trial lawyer friend Doug Weinstein, previously a big Edwards fan, has soured.
Bill Richardson: A grownup. Unlike the other Democratic candidates, good on the Second Amendment. Management experience at both the state and federal levels. Bad on the war, though I don't think his current bug-out strategy on Iraq would rule if he became President. Downsides: Largely charisma-free, even by the standards of this not-very-charismatic crowd.
I don't know what these impressions are worth, really, but here they are. If you want to express your own preferences, why not vote in the Straw Poll (voting widget is in the upper right) and let's see what you think.
Meanwhile, though it's not exactly an endorsement, my vote is already spoken for! Er, assuming he's actually on the ballot . . . .
UPDATE: Ed Driscoll emails: "When I interviewed Tammy Bruce for PJM Political, she also stated that
she'd vote for Hillary over Huckabee."
ANOTHER UPDATE: A reader wonders what I think of Hillary on healthcare. I thought the "Nurse Ratched" reference answered that. And reader Walton Allen emails about Duncan Hunter: 'I know he only has like .5% of the vote, but you didn't mention him in that small write-up. Was just curious to know your impression of him....He's been on my local stations program in Dallas called "The Wells Report" on 570 KLIF in Dallas at least 5 times. Sounds like he actually represents what people want and will actually build a fence."
We talked to Duncan Hunter, and he seemed like a good guy, but I don't see him going anywhere. I could be wrong, of course.
MORE: Brendan Loy wonders what I think about Biden. Nice guy. I defended him against the Kinnock-plagiarism charges, which were silly and unfair. But while he's smarter and more engaging than Chris Dodd, I see his chances as about the same.
ARE CHRISTMAS SALES REALLY DISAPPOINTING? If so, it may be because women's fashion has missed the boat. Rachel Lucas expresses this view in her own inimitable fashion:
The biggest issue is WHO IN THE HELL IS MAKING THESE CLOTHES? I mean for f*ck’s sake, people. I haven’t seen such ugliness in all my life, even the 1970s. Everything is orange and pink and bright red, covered in ridiculous patterns that make you have a migraine. Nobody wants this sh*t! You can tell because of every item, there are 50 each of the orange, pink, and bright red left, but maybe one green and one blue remaining, either in extra-small or extra-large. Get a clue, designers. A g*ddamn CLUE. . . . Who slept through design class the day it was explained that MOST women have what we call a FIGURE, which means their waist and their hips are not the exact same circumference? We’ve been over this before and I will spare you another rant about it. It’s enough to say that by the time I came out of the dressing room, I was almost in tears and ready to start killin’. . . . You want women to spend money, try making attractive clothes for normal human females. It can’t be that hard. GAH!
The rest of her post also offers other, er, clues to why people might have chosen to stay home. I'm glad I did nearly all of my shopping online! (Via Colborne 2016).
UPDATE: Another post on this theme from Peg Kaplan: "From Macy's to Nordstrom's to TJMaxx and points inbetween, I saw enormous quantities of clothing that I wouldn't wear if someone paid me to do so. After over an hour of pawing through racks and racks and racks of sweaters, blouses, jackets and more that I couldn't imagine putting in my closet, much less wearing on my body, I could only think to myself: 'No wonder stores are complaining. Who, other than some 15 to 24 year olds, would buy this stuff?'"
DOES MANDATORY "DIVERSITY TRAINING" JUST LEAD TO MORE LAWSUITS? I certainly hope so . . .
LARRY KUDLOW says that Bush has had "a very good year." Well, certainly by comparison with the year before, anyway. And I agree with Larry that Bush and the GOP need to move against pork: "The statute of limitations for Republican overspending, over-earmarking, and over-corrupting that caused huge congressional losses in last year's campaign will not run out until the GOP shows taxpayers it again can be trusted on key issues of limited government and lower taxes." Yes.
Both of these guys are supported by reader donations, so if you like their work, don't forget the tipjars.
TURNING PLOWSHARES INTO SWORDS: "Computer network security personnel are encountering more and more ugly surprises when they take apart the hacker programs that are planted in PCs. . . . While most of these super-payloads are being used for stealing money or salable information from individuals or companies, these tools can also be turned into military weapons."
OST-ALGIA: "That’s how it used to be in the Soviet Union; nothing but delicious lobster, all the time, for everyone."
UPDATE: I hope this guy is right: "I don't think that the antiwar spin after Tet would have succeeded--even given the idiotically unrealistic expectations the Johnson administration had created--if the Web had been available."
It's true that the Web, and talk radio, make the "wall of sound" approach to consensus-manufacture much more difficult.
IRAQPUNDIT: Dude, where's my story? Reader C.J. Burch emails: "It's almost like journalists don't want to tell about what is really happening."
Doesn't fit the narrative.
THE SURGE'S COLLATERAL DAMAGE: "The successes of President Bush's troop surge in Iraq are quieting things down in another, unexpected place: the Democratic campaign trail in Iowa and New Hampshire."
JOHNATHAN PEARCE on the growth of sovereign wealth funds: "The truth is, emerging economies in Asia, coupled with the petro-dollar wealth of the MidEast, parts of Asia, Russia and even Africa, is giving these funds a degree of market muscle that has taken some investment observers by surprise, but it should not do so. We are living through a major period of change in the economic clout of non-western states. We might as well learn to profit from it."
Each of the three taxes is now effectively 33 percent lower than it was in 1992. Since 1970, the federal beer tax has plummeted 63 percent. Many states taxes have also been falling.
At first blush, this sounds like good news: who likes to pay taxes, right? But taxes serve a purpose beyond merely raising general government revenue. Taxes on a given activity are also supposed to pay the costs that activity imposes on society. And for all that is wonderful about wine, beer and liquor, they clearly bring some heavy costs.
Nowhere in the discussion, though, are the -- apparently quite significant -- health benefits of alcohol taken into account. Shouldn't there be some balancing? After all, the vast majority of people who drink will never kill anyone in a drunk-driving accident, yet most of them probably drink moderately enough to get the health benefits.
For that matter, people who die early of cirrhosis probably save the government money in Social Security and Medicare. I'd be interested in seeing a fuller accounting of costs and benefits. Given the questionable track record of "public health" interventions in recent decades, at any rate, I'm going to be skeptical of these proposals. When the parasite problem is solved, perhaps we can talk about further efforts in social engineering. Well, no, not even then.
THE HUCKABEE / NOVO NORDISK STEM CELL STORY doesn't seem to be getting much media traction. It's like they're rooting for him. Some discussion here, though: "Over the weekend, it came out that Huckabee received $35,000 in honoraria in 2006 from a company that does stem cell research, the very same company that social conservatives blasted Mitt Romney over because his blind trust had invested in it. Huckabee's take of $35,000 from the stem cell researchers was but a small sliver of the roughly $378,000 in outside fees that Huckabee raked in during his final year as Arkansas' governor. Too bad he didn't have Hillary Clinton's facility with commodities trading--such a skill probably would have made things easier for Huckabee."
UPDATE: Reader Jason Palk emails:
Long time reader, first time e-mail response:
I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here, or if there are serious issues here, then just about every candidate is taking money from a corporation with politically inconvenient sources of income.
Your characterization of Novo Nordisk as a firm that participates in embryonic stem cell research is correct, but belies the fact that millions of diabetics around the world rely on Novo Nordisk's products. The first thing that comes to my mind is that it is a company that makes insulin, not as a company that participates in stem cell research, but you do not characterize it as such in any of your posts so far on the subject. It would be far more benign to your readers to see that Huckabee was paid by a company known for making diabetes drugs that happens to do research in embryonic stem cells.
If this remains a serious issue in your mind, I would point out that many universities that fund embryonic stem cell research in lieu of taking federal research funds are supported by their congressmen and senators, even though their primary purpose is not to support embryonic stem cell research. We should then speak out against anyone speaking on any University of California campus, for example, as those campuses receive funds and carry out embryonic stem cell research.
The same argument can hold true for any corporation that carries out as its primary purpose some service or good, but at the same time does some that is politically inconvenient, such as bribing foreign officials or God forbid, spending too much money in Congress.
Hmm. But wouldn't these defenses apply equally to Mitt Romney, who got grief from pro-life people for investing in Novo Nordisk?
Look, I'm pro stem-cell research. Leaving aside the separate question of whether a sitting governor should earn a lot of money from people who may have interests relating to his day job, I don't have a problem with people taking money from Novo Nordisk. But if you think embryonic stem cell research is so bad that Romney's investment was bad, why isn't it just as bad for Huckabee to take money from Novo Nordisk?
ANOTHER UPDATE: Bob Krumm emails:
I’ve long thought that gotcha politics about who took campaign contributions from whom is usually a silly game to play. Even a max donation of $2,300 is hardly enough to sway a US Senate candidate, much less a presidential aspirant. However, this wasn’t a simple campaign contribution. This was a payment of $35,000 along with an unspecified agreement to distribute thousands of copies of Gov. Huckabee’s book. This wasn’t a contribution; it was a relationship.
MY EARLIER SUGGESTION that immigration enforcement, minimal as it is, is still making a difference seems to have been correct:
In the past year, U.S. immigration police have stepped up workplace sweeps across the country and teamed up with a growing number of local forces to train officers to enforce immigration laws. . . . Mexican consular sources in Phoenix say they are seeing a spike in the number of immigrants applying for Mexican citizenship for their U.S.-born children, which will allow them to enroll in schools in Mexico.
They are also seeing a rise in requests for papers enabling families to carry household belongings back to Mexico, free of import duties.
Members of the Brazilian community in the U.S. northeast, meanwhile, say they are starting to see an increase in the number of illegal immigrants heading back to their homes in Brazil in recent months.
Apparently there's more sensitivity to enforcement at the margins than many people believed.
UPDATE: A reader suggests that the falling dollar is why people are leaving -- since the money they send home would be worth less. That sounds plausible, but I checked the dollar/peso conversion chart and the dollar's about where it was in May, and when you look at the five year chart things seem to have been pretty stable, so that doesn't seem especially likely.
Several other readers noted the irony of needing Mexican citizenship to enroll in Mexican schools, when American citizenship is not required to enroll in American schools. I don't know the Mexican law on the subject beyond this passing reference in a news story, but I suspect that a demand for strict reciprocity would produce amusing political results.
Roundworms may infect close to a quarter of inner city black children, tapeworms are the leading cause of seizures among U.S. Hispanics and other parasitic diseases associated with poor countries are also affecting Americans, a U.S. expert said on Tuesday.
SLED POLICE -- with radar guns. I agree with the commenter who says, "When cops start this kinda thing, it’s time to start laying them off. They have way too much time on their hands."
UPDATE: Orin Kerr thinks my provocative headline is misleading. I guess he's right, though I saw the story as evidence of creeping nanny-statism, likely to produce a slippery slope leading to mandatory helmet laws, actual speed limits, etc. Plus, who didn't know that sleds can go 19 miles per hour, roughly as fast as a man can run? This seems to be how most of the commenters at Don Surber's blog, linked above, saw it too. We've been down that slippery slope in plenty of other areas, and we didn't need a sled to do it. But to the extent my pithiness was misleading, I apologize. Meanwhile, Meryl Yourish has thoughts that I hope are tongue-in-cheek. Er, can you do that while wearing a mouthguard?
CHRISTMAS RETAIL SALES UP, BUT BY A MODEST 3.6% -- but online sales were up 22.4%. The New York Times calls those numbers "bleak," a term that's more accurately used in reference to its stock prices . . . .
UPDATE: Reader, and hedge-fund manager, George Zachar emails:
Investors now have to gauge not only the reality of economic data, but its predictable willful misrepresentation by the press. We therefore have to speculate not only on underlying conditions, but on the effectiveness of the effort to scupper Main Street confidence.
On another matter, tech unfriendliness is a big driver in NYC commercial real estate, and the conversion of many older buildings into residential lofts.
Yeah, the press reports have consequences besides their intended one, of swinging the elections.
UPDATE: Reader Eric West emails:
The same schmuck, Michael Barbaro, wrote a similar story in 2005. He also wrote a story back in September of his year trying to say back to school sales only looked good, but really weren't:
Why do we care what the some schmuck at the New York Times writes anymore, anyway?
It's like reading something Andrew Sullivan writes and instead of saying, "Sullivan thinks....." we write, "The Blogosphere today announced that...."
Bologne. We need to get out of the habit of saying, "The New York Times....." and giving backing to these folks. Instead, we should say, "Michael Barbaro wrote....." and treat him just like we'd treat anyone in the blogosphere.
Good point. Why let people hide behind institutions? And, of course, Barbaro's other retail coverage has sometimes been a bit tendentious.
MORE: Well, this makes the NYT look worse, even if it doesn't necessarily make the economy look better -- apparently the NYT was reporting good and bad spins on the same numbers in two different stories on its front page today. And Kevin Drum says that since the numbers aren't indexed for inflation, sales actually dropped, which would be "bleak" -- but that doesn't get Barbaro or the NYT off the hook because their story didn't do any indexing. On the other hand, are Christmas goods subject to deflation not inflation?
A LOOK AT HOW THINGS ARE GOING for the Automotive X-Prize and other high-mpg pursuits.
SO I JUST BOOKED A DIVE TRIP THE OTHER DAY, and what do I get in the mail but this. How do they know?
INTERESTING THEORY: An argument that one reason for the housing bubble is that new technologies don't retrofit well to older houses. I'm not sure there's much to it, but hey . . . .
CNET: The year in tech politics: "Democrats in 2007 controlled both chambers of Congress for the first time in a dozen years--and with the power shift came a scattershot year for technology policy. Sweeping initiatives like elevating minimum wage and lowering prescription drug prices, not technology topics, took the forefront. What that meant was a year of largely unfinished business--or, less charitably, unfulfilled promises--for high-tech companies." (Via Slashdot). Plus, this bad news: "Post-election plans from the Democrats to require paper trails of all oft-maligned electronic voting machines used in federal races also appear to have collapsed."
SHUTTING DOWN THE F.E.C. -- plus, Simon's Law: "The politician who campaigns hardest on cleaning up corruption is the biggest crook."
SPENDING CHRISTMAS ON YOUR OWN? Join the discussion.
OKAY, WE'RE NOT HAVING THE TROPICAL CHRISTMAS that we had last year. But it's still a nice one. Hope yours is, too.
MERRY CHRISTMAS: Space-based solar energy for Palau:
In September, American entrepreneur Kevin Reed proposed at the 58th International Astronautical Congress in Hyderabad, India, that Palau's uninhabited Helen Island would be an ideal spot for a small demonstration project, a 260-foot-diameter "rectifying antenna," or rectenna, to take in 1 megawatt of power transmitted earthward by a satellite orbiting 300 miles above Earth.
That's enough electricity to power 1,000 homes, but on that empty island the project would "be intended to show its safety for everywhere else," Reed said in a telephone interview from California.
Reed said he expects his U.S.-Swiss-German consortium to begin manufacturing the necessary ultralight solar panels within two years, and to attract financial support from manufacturers wanting to show how their technology — launch vehicles, satellites, transmission technology — could make such a system work. He estimates project costs at $800 million and completion as early as 2012.
Plus, it's greenhouse-friendly:
"The climate change implications are pretty clear. You can get basically unlimited carbon-free power from this," said Mark Hopkins, senior vice president of the National Space Society in Washington. . . . Some seem to hear the call. The European Space Agency has scheduled a conference on space-based solar power for next Feb. 29. Space Island Group, another entrepreneurial U.S. endeavor, reports "very positive" discussions with a European utility and the Indian government about buying future power from satellite systems.
FINISHED THE NEW Harry Turtledove book last night. It was good -- a bit more scattered since it's really several novellas loosely knit together, but still good.
PEACE ON EARTH? "While the headlines concentrate on peace breaking out in Iraq, that's but part of a worldwide trend for the last few years. Violence has also diminished, or disappeared completely, in places like Nepal, Chechnya. Congo, Indonesia and Burundi."
Here's a prediction that'll make you squirm: In the future, people will fall in love with robots. Robots will not be cold, predictable machines, but actual lovers -- precocious, sexy, and remarkably humanlike in appearance. Humans will even marry robots in certain obliging jurisdictions. Now send the kids into the other room while we mention the obvious, bizarre implication: Someday, people will have sex with robots.
And not just cold, mechanical sex that barely incites a feeble meep-meep-meep from your robot lover: No, we're talking about real elbow-pads-and-helmets sex. Electrifying sex! (And afterward the robot will take a drag on a cigarette and say, "That really recharged my batteries.")
I'M WATCHING MIKE HUCKABEE ON KUDLOW RIGHT NOW, and he's holding forth on "overpaid CEOs."
What about governors? "Mike Huckabee's $35,000 in speaking fees from stem cell researcher Novo Nordisk is getting attention. As is his overall speaking fee policy. I'm still scratching my head at the $138,500 for fifteen speeches Huckabee collected last year." The more I learn, the less I like him.
UPDATE: Reader Ken Kemper emails:
I saw a portion of that while at the gym, and found his comments on the "overpaid executive" a tad frightening. He wants the boards of (presumably) all corporations to rein in and control the pay of these CEOs, and if the boards do not then as President he will push for congress to pass laws to do so. But only as a last resort.
So he's playing the populist "no CEO should cash out for millions while the poor schlub working the factory floor loses his retirement" shtick, and he's not afraid to campaign as a BIG government type who as president will want laws overturning free-market principles?
Tell me again why any conservative is listening to him?
Beats me. But the more he talks, the fewer will do so, I suspect.
Continuing to prove that nobody knows who is going to win the Democratic nomination, the latest University of New Hampshire-administered poll (PDF) contradicts a poll the survey center took just four days earlier. Over the last two weeks, Obama's support has gone from 30 percent to 26 percent to 30 percent, while Clinton's has ranged from 31 percent to 38 percent to 28 percent. Obama and Clinton are now statistically tied, as if it matters.
The last few elections, the polls haven't proved especially reliable.
Did you notice the last paragraph in the AP story you linked to?
"Hitler's totalitarian leadership as Fuhrer during 1934 until his eventual suicide in 1945 resulted in the persecution of an estimated six million Jews in the Holocaust, and his invasion of Poland in 1939 led to the start of the Second World War."
Thats right, no one was exterminated - they were simply persecuted.
I don't think it's an AP story, unless "World Entertainment News" is part of AP. But the point stands.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Charles Martin emails:
I don't think you're being fair to Will Smith, frankly, Glenn. He's saying that Hitler didn't wake up and, like Simon LeGree, wring his hands and say "I want to do Evil today. Eeeevilll." He's saying that even though it was twisted, it made some kind of twisted sense *to* *him*. Do you doubt that? it's seems pretty obvious to me.
Now, whether he could have been "reprogrammed" after 1930, I dunno. Sometimes mad dogs have to be put down. But I don't think Hitler could have done the things he did if he were merely doing evil as an avocation.
Well, yeah, maybe. But actually that's part of the point of Goldberg's book, Liberal Fascism. Hitler was a nurturer . . . . Meanwhile, reader Dede Bright writes:
"Stuff like that just needs reprogramming."
Isn't Will Smith a member of Scientology? That sounds like a very Scientology thing to say, doesn't it? Quite frightening.
I don't know. I don't keep track of Scientologists.
STILL MORE: Dave Price comments: "He has said some truly cringe-inducing things before; I remember seeing him on Letterman, maybe ten years ago, saying he believed AIDS came from a government laboratory (he cringed himself when he said it, so maybe he understood that statement was a little out there). He was pretty young at the time, so maybe chalk that up to youth and the life of an entertainer. Let's be clear on what this is not: this is not anti-Semitism or sympathy for anything Adolf Hitler did. Smith is a nice, well-meaning, fairly bright guy; this isn't an drunken rant about Jews or telling a new mother she shouldn't take antidepressants, but rather just a somewhat naive philosophical statement to the effect of 'everyone thinks they're doing good even when they're not,' the theme of I Am Legend, the screen adaptation of which he is starring in." I don't actually believe that everyone thinks they're doing good, but okay. More at the link.
PETER WEHNER on Mike Huckabee. "Some of us -- in my case, a political conservative and evangelical Christian -- are getting a queasy feeling when it comes to the presidential campaign of former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, and much of it has to do with his use of faith in this political campaign."
UPDATE: Reader Bill Brown emails:
When I was engaged in rental housing I found that when a prospective tenant I was interviewing volunteered as one of the reasons I should rent to him that he was a Christian, it almost always followed that his tenancy would result in poor payment and/or damage to the house. If I found out later that he was a Christian we could have great fellowship, but I soon learned to be very cautious, and hopefully go on to the next applicant, if his Christianity was put forth in the dicker.
Yes, a phenomenon similar to "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
THIS SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT: "If a nuclear war between Israel and Iran were to break out 16-20 million Iranians would lose their lives - as opposed to 200,000-800,000 Israelis, according to a report recently published by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies."
REVIEWING THE REVIEWERS: A roundup of Sunday's book reviews.
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: The Wall Street Journal editorializes on pork. It's subscription-only, but this link ought to work for nonsubscribers for a while. Excerpt:
Our suggestion is that Mr. Bush instruct his cabinet not to spend money on earmarks that aren't specifically mentioned in the language of the spending bill. Most are listed in accompanying Appropriations Committee reports that lack the force of law. The point of this Congressional ruse, in part, is to let Members "air-drop" earmarks at the last minute and thus escape scrutiny by other Members who might try to expose their "Bridges to Nowhere" on the House or Senate floor. Mr. Bush assailed this habit in this year's State of the Union address, and the Members cheered. So why not force Congress to live up to its applause?
Some in the White House fear that such a move would sour relations with Congress, including GOP leaders who love their earmarks as much as Democrats do. We hear that senior Republicans, especially in the Senate, have told the White House that if Mr. Bush refuses to fund these earmarks, he will be courting retribution. There's a reason no Members will make this threat in public, however. They know how unpopular earmarking is with the voting public.
Meanwhile, 19 taxpayer groups and individuals have written an open letter to Mr. Bush picking up on our proposal. The letter asks the President to issue "an executive order formally directing all Federal agencies to ignore non-legislative earmarks tucked into committee reports and statements of managers. Such an action is within your Constitutional powers, and would strike a blow for fiscal responsibility now while setting a valuable precedent for the future."
I agree. And here's the full text of the PorkBusters letter that's quoted above.
Circulation, the medical journal for the American Heart Association, created a stir when it reported a study of 22 heart transplant patients who were given a dose of dark chocolate or fake chocolate. Just two hours after eating the real thing, patients had measurable improvements in blood flow and vascular function and less clotting, compared to placebo chocolate eaters, who experienced no changes.
Now the bad news:
In fact, the editors point out that the very thing that makes chocolate good for you — the antioxidants called flavanols – also make chocolate taste bitter. As a result, confectionery makers often take out the flavanols, stripping the chocolate of its main health-promoting properties. Worse, labels usually don’t tell you whether your chocolate comes with or without flavanols, making it tough to know if a particular piece of chocolate has any health benefits at all.
D'oh!
MARK BOWDEN: "No one should be prosecuted for waterboarding Abu Zubaydah."
"MR. CLEAN:" "It's difficult to believe the levels of incompetence coming out of New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's office in his first year and to cap things off we now learn the computers in his office have been scrubbed free of possibly incriminating email files surrounding the dirty tricks campaign against State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno. Can you imagine the howls coming from the mostly left-leaning New York media if a Republican did this? Yes, so can I."
OUCH: "So, the question for Huckabee is, how are you going to stand up to terrorists, if you can't even stand up to Rush? He may not realize it, yet, but Huckabee has already lost this confrontation." And that's before you get to all the financial problems.
MORE OF THE SAME, BUT WORTH REPEATING: The importance of hand washing. My local mall now has Purel dispensers in many locations. I approve.
THE PROBLEM WITH THE STAFF OPINION: They're not elected. I mean, they have some expertise, but the notion that it's disinterested, apolitical expertise is by now quite obviously bogus -- and wouldn't be a decisive factor even if it were true. We do not live in a technocracy, nor should we.
NEWSBUSTERS WONDERS why the Huckabee stem cell story isn't getting more attention. Well, it's the slowest news weekend of the year and lots of media folks are on vacation. Oh, and also, they want Huckabee to get the nomination so the GOP will lose in the fall.
ALMOST ENOUGH REASON BY ITSELF TO BACK BARACK: "Jesse Jackson can still get a crowd going—when he can find one. He appeared at a Los Angeles restaurant this fall, primed to discuss school dropout rates and home foreclosures. But only eight people showed up, mostly reporters. It's no longer Reverend Jackson's day in the sun, or any other black leader's whose name isn't Barack Obama. So where does that leave the leaders to whom black America has long turned in times of crisis—Jackson, and the Revs. Andrew Young and Al Sharpton? At times they can seem like jealous, cranky old men."
VITAMIN D UPDATE: "Vitamin D tests conducted on a group of University of Toronto students have found that virtually all non-whites had insufficient levels of the sunshine vitamin, putting them at elevated risk of debilitating diseases such as osteoporosis, cancer and diabetes. . . . Vitamin D insufficiency used to be thought of as a problem causing only rickets, but in recent years, researchers have found that low levels of the nutrient are linked to a disparate range of diseases and health problems, including many types of cancer, osteoporosis, mult-iple sclerosis, diabetes and susceptibility to tuberculosis and influenza." And many of the whites had low levels, too. Sun isn't all bad, you know.
And it's not just Canada -- we see low levels in the United States, too:
Recent research shows up to 50 percent of kids and adults in the United States are at high risk for vitamin D deficiency. It's not to be taken lightly -- a lack of vitamin D has been linked to a whole host of diseases. And research continues to show it has a significant effect on cancer.
We're even seeing a resurgence in rickets as people keep their kids indoors or slather them with sunscreen. And Vitamin D may even slow aging:
A King's College London study of more than 2,000 women found those with higher vitamin D levels showed fewer ageing-related changes in their DNA. . . . They found that, after adjusting the results for the age of the volunteer, women with higher levels of vitamin D were more likely to have longer telomeres in these cells, and vice versa.
That's good, if it's true. Meanwhile, don't hide from the sun. You only need 10-15 minutes a day, but it's important to get that.
MORE ON THE LAME incandescent bulb ban that Congress just produced. And this seems right to me: “Sure, you’ll see more compact fluorescents five years from now, but you would have seen them without any energy bill." The only real argument for this is that it preempts even dumber -- and probably inconsistent -- laws from the states.
NOT JUST A WRONG-HOUSE RAID, but an actual home invasion by a police officer who appears to have been moonlighting in crime. But he still couldn't get the right house: "Ferman said the men were looking to retaliate against someone they thought had stolen money from a friend of theirs who was a drug dealer. Apparently, the men picked the wrong address and broke into the apartment of a couple who were not involved, Ferman said."
I've had experience with this technology, and I don't think it's the people who are dumb.
ADVICE TO MUSICIANS FROM DAVID BYRNE: "What is called the music business today, however, is not the business of producing music. At some point it became the business of selling CDs in plastic cases, and that business will soon be over. But that's not bad news for music, and it's certainly not bad news for musicians."
FRED THOMPSON works Iowa hard. "Fred is confounding the pundits with a bruising schedule when it matters most."
UPDATE: Did the L.A. Timespull a Politico? "Not only not accurate, but it sure seems that between the two of them, Michael Finnegan is much lazier than Fred Thompson."
MARS, MEET ASTEROID: "Mars could be in for an asteroid hit. A newly discovered hunk of space rock has a 1 in 75 chance of slamming into the Red Planet on Jan. 30." I'd rather see a nice big comet strike that might donate some water and volatiles -- might as well jump-start the terraforming process . . . .
RACIAL UNDERCURRENTS IN THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN: "It has unfolded mostly under the radar. But an important development in the 2008 Democratic battle may be the building backlash among African Americans over comments from associates of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton that could be construed as jabs at Sen. Barack Obama's race." I noted this danger a while back.
I'M KIND OF EMBARRASSED to see this happen in Tennessee: "According to the Williamson County School System, self defense is no defense when it comes to getting suspended for fighting. " In that case, I think she should sue the school system and principal for failing to protect her.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Roger Martin emails: "Sadly this is common practice. My co-worker's son was jumped by three students in McGavock High School here in Nashville a couple of years ago. All were suspended for three days. The dad, my co-worker, protested to the principal. The principal showed him tapes of the fight. It was clear that the three other kids started the fight by jumping my co-worker's son. But tough luck, the zero tolerance policy says that all must suspended. My co-worker's son was a straight A student and the three thugs that jumped him had just returned from another suspension for fighting. This is very common in the Middle Tennessee area schools and most likely all over the US."
Sounds like we need legislation.
MORE: Reader Dennis Halpin writes:
My son had a similar problem here in Seattle. I called the principal and told him to inform the aggressor that assault and battery is a criminal offense and I would press charges if it happened again. Then I was going to sue the school, the district and the principal for not providing a safe place for my son to go to school. Aggression that had been going on literally for years stopped, but only when the consequences got big enough to get their attention.
Yep. Violence is only a problem when it's a problem for the people in charge. In general, it's probably better to be a litigious jerk in these circumstances. They've made clear that that's the behavior they want to reward . . . .
HUCKABUCKS: More thoughts on Huckabee's stem-cell dollars, and other financial issues, from Bob Krumm. "In addition to the payments from Novo Nordisk, Mike Huckabee took a third of a million , much of it from organizations with governmental interests, even while he was Governor of Arkansas. . . . Taking payments from companies with businesses effected by pending legislation apparently doesn’t violate any ethical rules in Arkansas. Nor does sitting on a corporate board while governor. This is after all a state that has produced another former governor who infamously played close to the line of the law. But it certainly isn’t right."
ANOTHER UPDATE: Jonah Goldberg: "Wonder why this hasn't made more of a splash." A cynic might suggest that it's because the mainstream media folks want Huckabee to get the nomination, because he'll be easy for the Democrats to beat.
MORE: Maybe you don't have to be that much of a cynic . . . . Related thoughts here.