WHY DOES IT STILL TAKE SO LONG to publish a book? "Technology may be speeding up the news cycle, but in publishing, things actually seem to be slowing down." Blame the marketers. Though as many authors can attest, despite all that time and attention to marketing, the publisher often fails to have enough books at Amazon and other locations when the book actually comes out.
MO-MITT-UM? An easy win for Romney in Maine, amid high turnout. "Mitt Romney won 53% of the vote, followed not at all closely by John McCain, who won 21% and Ron Paul, who won 19%." Plus, he's up 9 in the polls in Missouri. I wonder: Is McCain's poor showing in the last debate actually making a difference?
LOTS OF STUFF, INCLUDING VIDEO, on the new Macbook Air. I looked at one when I was at the mall yesterday. It's very cool -- jewel-like, thin, and with a great display. I think I'd rather the screen be a bit smaller, and the computer a bit thicker, but it did look nice, and the Insta-Wife liked it.
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILYEDITORIALIZES: "Is it just us, or is there something off about ex-president Bill Clinton using his influence overseas to enrich a pal and then accepting the pal's big donation to his foundation? This looks like a bribery racket."
MICROSOFT LIVES UP TO THE STEREOTYPE: To open the Vista box you need instructions?
IS THE ANGRY LEFT DYING? Or do they just smell funny?
ANTI-AGING RESEARCH, SPACE, AND SUPERBOWL TECHNOLOGY -- all on this week's Popular Mechanics podcast. Plus, don't be a wimp -- change your own oil!
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: "Three unexpected developments have given Republicans a shot this year at winning — once thought impossible, given the normal desire of the electorate for a fresh party after eight years, and worries about Iraq and the economy. All can change, but for now they have a real shot."
A REAL SOLAR INDUSTRY RISES IN CALIFORNIA. I talked to the folks at Elon Musk's (he's the founder of PayPal and SpaceX, and the Tesla Roadster financier) Solar City and they told me they'd have their turnkey solar systems in my area within the year. I just might buy one.
MORE ON THAT NAVY RAILGUN TEST: There's video here. But what's all the flame? Plasma generated by the electrical discharge?
A bill passed this week by a House committee would guarantee people the right to carry or possess firearms on the campuses of South Dakota's public universities.
HB1261 would also prevent schools from expelling students or firing employees for having a gun on campus.
I hope that more states -- including mine -- follow suit. If it saves just one life, it's worth it.
OVER AT THE NRO PLANET GORE BLOG, they've been debating Bob Zubrin's flexfuel plan. Here's Zubrin's response to some criticisms, and here's more commentary from Anne Korin of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security.
MORE "HELP" FOR HILLARY FROM BILL: "Once again, former President Bill Clinton seems poised to be pitchforked into the headlines right on the eve of a crucial primary vote amid a report that he’s going to 'repent' by going to some black churches."
LIKE AN IPHONE, BUT WITH FANCY GPS: The Garmin Nuviphone actually sounds pretty cool. I'm looking at a cellphone upgrade sometime soon, so maybe I'll consider this. Though I kind of like it that my current cellphone is basically, you know, a phone.
As I note in this piece, though -- final version now posted, in print soon -- I think that Winkler omits the most important of the state cases on the right to bear arms.
UPDATE: Reader Richard Riley emails: "It would be fine to ask the Democratic candidates what they think about the Berkeley City Council's dissing the Marines, but if Bob Krumm thinks this would generate some antimilitary waffling I think he's wrong. Clinton and Obama have already stated they'll enforce the Solomon Amendment."
ANOTHER UPDATE: Related thoughts here: "This is more of an indictment of the media than it is of the Senators in question."
I know some say that they’d rather 'have the country ruined' by a real liberal than by a RINO. You know what that sounds like? Something you’d read on DailyKos." . . .
Don’t get excited. I don’t like a lot of his record, particularly a long list of quotes he’s given about class warfare and taxes. I think he’s nuts to want the Gitmo population put into American prisons. YEAH RIGHT. I think he’s an asshole for things he’s said and supported about gun shows.
And I don’t even have enough curse words in my brain to communicate my opinions about McCain-Feingold. Jesus on a muffin, that is some bad, bad stuff.
BUT.
Seriously, people. Seriously. You’d rather have Hillary? You’d rather have Obama?
I don’t even know you.
Read the whole thing, which is all expressed in Rachel's own inimitable fashion. . . .
PUBLIC SAFETY AND THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS: An article by Bob Cottrol and Ray Diamond. I haven't read it yet, but given their past work I'm sure it's worth your time if you're interested in the topic.
Does something seem oddly familiar about the case of Donald Hindley at Brandeis? As Torch readers well know, Donald Hindley is a professor who has served Brandeis for over 46 years and was found guilty of "racial harassment," apparently for criticizing and explaining use of the word "wetback" to deride Mexicans and other immigrants. I say "apparently" because, as Eugene Volokh so effectively has pointed out, Brandeis has not even been clear with Hindley what words got him in trouble. Still, all signs point to the use of the word "wetback," which a single student apparently found so offensive that he or she filed a complaint, regardless of the context in which the term was used.
If the case seems to ring a bell, it should. Such tales of PC run wild have been with us in fiction for decades. The Hindley case reminds me of Philip Roth's The Human Stain, in which a professor's career is turned upside down after he refers to two students who did not show up for class as "spooks." The professor, of course, meant "ghosts," but when the two missing students turn out to be black, the incident ignites a firestorm of identity and personal politics. (The professor, it turns out, is actually a light-skinned black man himself who has hidden his race all of his life, adding a nice Rothian touch.)
As Wendy Kaminer has pointed out, punishing someone for using an epithet in order to decry its use is right out of an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm, where Larry gets in trouble for using the n-word even though his point was that the n-word should not be used. Volokh also points out another similar situation, the famous moment in Monty Python's Life of Brian when a crowd stones anyone who uses the word Jehovah even when they are trying to use the word to make the point that it shouldn't be said! Such nightmarish due process violations and abuse of language always bring to mind Kafka and Orwell, and for me, of course, Lenny Bruce and George Carlin.
UPDATE: In the Slashdot comments, there's some dispute as to whether Iran is really cut off. Meanwhile, Richard Fernandez at The Belmont Club has thoughts on undersea cables.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Clint Hutchison writes:
Regarding your recent post about Iran being cut off from the net, if you browse to http://router1.iust.ac.ir/, the node used for a benchmark at http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm, you get asked for a username and password to connect.
Perhaps Iran isn't cut off, but is battening down the hatches.
MORE ON PROBLEMS IN AFGHANISTAN, from Abu Muqawama. Michael Yon has been warning about this for months, but it doesn't seem to have gotten enough attention.
UPDATE: I'm the very first one, according to this followup email:
As I think Jackie Nelson has already told you, you are the first-ever Yalie of the Week on our website. (I do hope you view this as a blessing rather than a curse.) We've admired your work, and have had you on our copious list for the print magazine, for quite some time. We're bound to come to you for the print magazine one day soon, but meanwhile, this seemed a good way to start.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Prof. Kenneth Mayer is one of many who's sad to hear about the Doodle:
Glenn: I was in grad school at Yale in the 80s, and frequented the Doodle. It was cheap, fast, and good: two eggs over easy, hash browns, a muffin, probably $3. The guy who ran it was fast, and I can still picture him scrambling a couple of eggs in a steel bowl using forks. He was old school. I’m sad to hear the news that it’s closing but it did bring up some fond memories.
Yeah, I stole his fork-scrambling technique, though I've never achieved his speed.
MORE: Lots more emails, including this from Cormac Kehoe:
In the fall of ’89 I was a broke student too proud to ask my (somewhat struggling) parents for money. At that time, Doodle regulars could occasionally “put it up,” i.e., run a tab. Lew, the owner, floated me at the Doodle for over a month, a tab that neared $200. Never once was I asked to pay up – they just trusted that I would. And I did, plus a big tip for the interest equivalent. I have never forgotten the kindness and never will. Great place, great people, great food. My favorites: ham and egg on a roll, cheeseburger with an egg on top, and the decadent fried doughnut with butter!
Nice story.
WHAT OTHER COUNTRIES CAN TEACH THE UNITED STATES about free-market reforms. "Every industrialised country in the world has launched free-market reforms during the past two to three decades. About a dozen of these countries have reformed substantially in a number of areas. The United States is one of these. But other countries have achieved more in areas where the US still has a lot do to. And the economic and social results from the reforms have often far exceeded expectations."
BOB OWENS HAS THOUGHTS on today's female suicide bombings in Baghdad:
Both bombs appear to have been remote detonated. These women probably did not know they were carrying explosives at all, and it would probably be fair to include them among the victims. . . . This tells us several things.
First, it tells us that al Qaeda in Iraq recognizes that attempts to use male suicide bombers and vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs), their preferred method of suicide attacks for those seeking martyrdom, are no longer effective. These attacks fail because the combination of coalition military forces, Iraqi security forces, and neighborhood militias, known as "concerned local citizens" (CLCs) creating a security system that increasingly works, and makes it very unlikely that these preferred attacks will succeed. There is also some speculation that the influx of would-be foreign suicide bombers into Iraq is drying up.
Today's attacks also tell us that al Qaeda in Iraq is getting very desperate in seeking the high-casualty attacks that they so value. They were forced to scrape the bottom of the proverbial barrel, and use not only women (which they'd prefer to subjugate), but mentally disabled women at that, suggesting that finding willing volunteers is becoming ever more difficult.
Good suicide-bombers are hard to find, and retention is even tougher. Meanwhile, Michael Yon emails from Iraq:
All well in South Baghdad, but sounds like the suicide bombings were pretty bad. I did not hear them detonate so must have been far away. It's the al Qaeda mode, though. Sounds like the women were mentally disabled.
And Austin Bay emails that this may be the start of the "Terrorist Tet" he's been predicting. As Bob Owens notes, some people here at home are all-too-eager to help. Just like last time.
WHAT, BEER ISN'T ENOUGH? A Super Bowl drink recipe. Call me crazy, but I think that Super Bowls and Midori don't mix. . . .
INSTAPUNDIT TRAFFIC HAS BEEN really good this year. Don't know the reason for the increase, but hey --Thanks for visiting!
WHICH OF THESE MEN DID THE PHOTOGRAPHER THINK was a hero?
Dr. Wright, a 40-year-old runner, decided to study people who kept training as they got older or began competing in middle age. She wanted to know what happens to them and at what age does performance start to decline.
Their results are surprising, even to many of the researchers themselves. The investigators find that while you will slow down as you age, you may be able to stave off more of the deterioration than you thought. Researchers also report that people can start later in life — one man took up running at 62 and ran his first marathon, a year later, in 3 hours 25 minutes.
It’s a testament to how adaptable the human body is, researchers said, that people can start serious training at an older age and become highly competitive. It also is testament to their findings that some physiological factors needed for a good performance are not much affected by age.
I don't think this is especially surprising. In my observation, the main thing that slows people down when they're older, assuming they keep exercising, is the cumulative effect of joint injury and wear. The rest of the body seems to hold up pretty well.
IN RESPONSE TO MY EARLIER POST on the Asus Eee PC, Dave Johnston emails:
What the reviewers have been missing - frustratingly, even Walt Mossberg made this mistake - is that while you CAN use the little WiFi icon and "Wireless Networks" feature to connect to hotspots, you should actually be setting up wireless using the "Network" option to create a frequent, known hotspot, such as your house or favorite coffee spots.
Click into "Network," click "Create" a connection and follow the steps to make sure that your Eee remembers that connection. You can set it to remember the security key as well as tell it to auto connect, even "On Boot" if you choose.
I have set up my three most frequent networks, and it connects EVERY time, within 30 seconds or so after the super fast boot.
I'll give it a try. Plus, in the comments over at PopMech, people say you can use the Verizon USB card without any software. I'll have to give that a try sometime too.
SYMBOLISM BACKFIRES: You could see this coming. Well, you could. They apparently didn't . . . .
MCCAIN AND ALCIBIADES? It's a stretch, but the temper point is valid. Though one of my friends, disappointed in Bush's measured approach to diplomacy, saw that as a feature, not a bug: "He just looks like he might get mad enough to nuke somebody." It could be like Nixon's crazy act!
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE: Microsoft to assimilate Yahoo!? Elsewhere, Michael Weiss calls it "a clear bid to outstrip Google of its market dominance."
SEEMS LIKE A GOOD IDEA TO ME: "West Virginia is considering a bill to teach schoolchildren how to handle a gun and hunt safely."
If it saves just one child's life, it's worth it. Who could be so cruel as to want our children to handle guns and hunt unsafely?
SHOUTING FIRE IN A CROWDED AIRPORT? "A lawyer for an MIT student held at gunpoint after she walked into Logan International Airport wearing what authorities believed was a bomb asked a judge to throw out the charges Friday, saying the device was a legitimate form of free speech." People don't seem to be buying it.
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: Hillary Clinton and John McCain on earmarks:
In his State of the Union address Monday, reinvigorated public discussion of earmarks — lawmakers’ specific spending items inserted into appropriations bills. While fiscal conservatives in Washington are skeptical about Bush’s ability to do much on the issue, the president may be helping his party by bringing up this issue, which touched on fiscal conservatism, government transparency and political corruption.
Earmarks, and their use of tools of corruption, could play a large role in the 2008 presidential contest if the current front-runners succeed in grabbing their respective parties’ nominations. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is a leading opponent of pork and one of the only lawmakers to forswear earmarks, while Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is Congress’ leading porker.
Clinton’s earmarking is not merely offensive to procedural purists who demand spending go through standard channels. It also is not merely a transgression against fiscal conservatism. Clinton’s earmarks often directly benefit specific corporations and businessmen, who, in turn, make large contributions to her campaign. This “pay-to-play” earmarking, as one left-leaning budget watchdog group put it, highlights the truly dirty side of earmarks.
Indeed.
HAPPY GRADUATION TO MAJOR JOHN TAMMES, who will celebrate by going to Disneyworld Iraq.
I THOUGHT HE REPRESENTED A NEW KIND OF POLITICS, but Mickey Kaus accuses Obama of outrageous pandering. "This isn't the language of a politician who wants to transcend partisan diference. This is the language of a politician who wants to wallow in partisan (and ideological) cant!" Nothing new about that . . . .
PROF. MIKE O'SHEA: "The Three Steps in D.C. v. Heller." Very interesting discussion. I'll just note that there are "penumbral" aspects to the "keeping" of arms, as recognized in some important state cases.
SNOW DESTROYS CHINESE CROPS: "The effects of China's weather crisis on its economy worsened yesterday as the devastation of winter crops added to pressures on food prices. . . . Government figures said that snow had destroyed crops on 3,000 square miles of land. Wholesalers in Beijing reported that supplies of some foodstuffs were down to a fifth of normal levels. In areas directly affected by the snow, such as the central industrial cities of Wuhan and Changsha, food prices have reportedly already doubled."
AN UNDERSEA CABLE OOPS: "Snapped undersea cables off the coast of Egypt have cut bandwidth in India to half its normal capacity. Users from Bangladesh to Egypt have been affected, and even Dubai's stock exchange experienced some problems late Wednesday." A ship's dropped anchor is blamed. Maybe this infrastructure needs to be a bit more robust? . . .
PRO-MCCAIN HERESY AT THE CORNER: "McCain wouldn't be my first pick. Then again, none of the candidates were really my first pick. But I think the notion that, variously, conservatism, the country or the party are doomed if he's the nominee or the president is pretty absurd. And I find such claims odd coming from some people who've insisted for a couple years now that the war on terror is the #1 overriding issue of this campaign."
A NEW POST FROM MICHAEL YON. He emails: "Am back in Iraq, where it's cold and muddy!" Hey, at least it's not snowing any more.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Victor Davis Hanson: "If one studies carefully the Clintama answers on the war on terror, illegal immigration, and Iraq then the magnitude of Republican infighting seems surreal. The gulf between Hillary and McCain is Grand-Canyon like."
MORE ON Obama and Rezko. "An undeclared $3.5 million (£1.8 million) payment from a corrupt Iraqi-British businessman has landed Barack Obama’s former fundraiser behind bars. The payment, disclosed in court papers, is the first time that Mr Obama’s long-serving bagman Antoin 'Tony' Rezko, a Syrian immigrant to the United States, has been linked to Nadhmi Auchi, the Iraqi-born billionaire who is one of Britain’s richest men. The relationship is a potential embarrassment for Mr Obama, who has made his opposition to the Iraq war a central plank of his campaign." Kind of tough language in this report from The Times.
There is a school of thought that this year's election will end up turning on economic anxiety rather than national security, especially with the threat of terrorism seeming less immediate than a few years ago, and the situation in Iraq having improved considerably. If this is so, then the leading campaigns in each party are not exactly inspiring great confidence.
I noticed this bit myself last night:
The economy is not John McCain's strong suit, by his own admission. You would think this would inspire a bit of humility, but humility is not what comes across from reading the transcript of last night's CNN debate at the Reagan Library. . . . Two of McCain's comments--"I did it out of patriotism, not for profit" and "sometimes people lost their jobs"--lead us to think that McCain's problem with economics goes beyond mere indifference. He seems to view the making of money--that is to say, the production of goods and services that people want, and the act of supplying them through voluntary exchange in a free market--as a less than honorable pursuit.
I POSTED MY REVIEW of the Asus Eee PC the other day, but here's a long-term review from the folks at Gizmodo. I have to say, though, that I'm not experiencing the frequent system crashes they are, nor am I having trouble finding wifi hotspots. What's annoying is that it won't automatically reconnect to a "known" hotspot -- you have to go to the "choose a connection" menu every time you start it up. But it seems to work okay, once you do that. And it's certainly not taking me anything like 5 minutes to get online -- more like 15 or 20 seconds.
"OBAMA SUPPORTERS EVERYWHERE, with nary a Hillary backer in sight." Roger Simon reports on the pre-debate festivities in Hollywood.
SOME SUPER-BOWL RELATED FOOD NEWS -- is double-dipping the chip really that bad? -- plus advice on setting up your HDTV for the game.
WITH THE SUPREME COURT HAVING GRANTED CERTIORARI in the Crawford case, my colleague Alex Long's piece on workplace retaliation is looking especially timely.
HE DOESN'T MENTION ZUBRIN, but Rick Santorum basically endorses the Zubrin flex-fuel plan. As I mentioned below, I'm hearing rumors of interest from the U.A.W., too. That makes sense. As Zubrin notes in his book, and mentioned on our podcast, U.S. automakers are actually ahead of their competitors in this technology.
FRED THOMPSON: "My guess is, we'll be missing him dreadfully by spring." Some people already are. I certainly would have liked him to provide adult supervision in last night's debate. And don't miss the concluding paragraphs, which are, alas, dead-on.
SOME PEOPLE WANTED TO KNOW what kind of guitar my brother is playing in this video. It's a Liberty FA-100.
SOME VERY IMPORTANT Jet Pack News! "Strictly speaking, you could the say the business of jet packs is, indeed, taking off. The number of companies looking to sell them to private consumers has increased by as much as 33 percent in the last week alone."
BLOGGERS -- a threat to national security? "Good. We should not fear our government, our government should fear us." Heh. Indeed. Full story here.
QUESTIONS FOR THE DEMOCRATS ABOUT THE ZUBRIN SPACE PLAN, at tonight's debate? Meanwhile, I'm hearing rumors of interest in the Zubrin energy plan from the UAW, which would make sense. (Edited to clarify which plan is which. Zubrin's got a lot of 'em. And they're mostly good!)
MARK STEYN: "I'm getting a bit tired of Senator McCain's anti-business shtick. The line about serving 'for patriotism, not for profit' is pathetic. America spends more on its military than the next 35-40 biggest military spenders on the planet combined: Where does he think the money for that comes from? . . . If greed is to be punishable, why doesn't he start with a pilot program applied to, say, the United States Senate and report back to us in five years how that's going?"
MORE ON THAT BLOWN DRUG RAID in Chesapeake that got a cop killed and a homeowner who was defending his home against unidentified intruders charged -- wrongly, it seems to me -- with murder.
A BUSH RALLY? Well, this political season has already demonstrated that anything can happen.
THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN CAN'T BE HAPPY ABOUT THIS REPORT: "Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton. . . . Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom. The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said."
BOB KRUMM: I don't get the McCainimosity. I get it a bit more after last night's debate, where McCain was something of a jerk. But still . . . Read the whole thing.
TOP FOUR TIPS FOR DRIVING LIKE A PRO: I always admired Jackie Stewart. On the other hand, the braking advice, while good, is . . . well . . . you'll see.
OBAMA CALLS CLINTON A DIVISIVE FIGURE. It's hard to argue with that.
REGARDING MY EARLIER POST, reader Don MacRae emails:
Long time daily reader, first time writer. I have noticed the Fred Thompson comments as well; file under "You Don't Know What You Got 'Til It's Gone". For the record, not only did I donate to his campaign, I went door to door to get signatures so he could be on the ballot here in Ohio and my wife was a state delegate to boot. I have been wondering who to support since Fred dropped out of the race and I am now fairly certain that I am going to vote for Fred anyway. Screw John McCain!
Fred may do surprisingly well, for a guy who's not running . . . .
GOOD POINT BY ROMNEY about how McCain shouldn't "demean" people who start businesses. McCain has been doing that a lot, acting as if meeting a payroll is somehow less honorable than working for the government.
SO I'M WATCHING MCCAIN TALK ABOUT THE SUBPRIME CRISIS, and how there may be some "greedy people on Wall Street who need to go to jail."
But I heard a typically sad-toned NPR story on subprimes tonight, and despite their best efforts to evoke the Joads it was a story of people who "used their houses like ATMs," taking out home equity loan after home equity loan when they started with a subprime mortgage, only to wind up owing far more than their houses were worth and unable to make the payments. Boo hoo. Shouldn't there be a price for being an idiot? And -- despite not being on Wall Street -- a greedy idiot? Why does McCain want to bail these people out? Why does he want to put Wall Street people in jail?
UPDATE: Reader John Mattaboni emails:
Speaking as a mortgage broker, I can assure you this is the case in the vast majority of instances. I spoke with a woman today who has a credit report that looks like a train wreck, including a bankruptcy fours years ago and numerous chargeoffs and collections since. Her gross income is less than $850 a week -- but she drives a car with a $700 payment.
She called me up because her adjustable rate mortgage payment is going up. When I told her that the only way she could qualify for a loan is to pay off the car with her mortgage, she threw a fit. Apparently me saving her $500 a month isn't good enough, she wanted to tap her ATM one last time for $30,000 to spend on "home improvements" rather than paying off the car. She then asked if anyone would really check to see if the money went into home upgrades.
He says there are a lot of "subprime deadbeats" out there and they shouldn't be bailed out.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Ben Skott emails:
I have a lot of credit card debt, and the much higher interest rates are killing me. I made a stupid mistake once years and didn't read the fine print to notice that rates on cash advances are even higher than normal CC debt, and I'm still paying for it, but you won't see me writing my newspaper talking about the greedy credit card companies and how I should get a bailout. What's the difference between me and some "poor" person with an ARM they signed on to and can't pay now?
Well, one difference is that MBNA bribed a lot of politicians to make the law tougher on people like you. . . .
This quote from Senator McCain, "greedy people on Wall Street who need to go to jail." oozes with irony and/or hypocrisy (I don't know which fits best).
Google "Charles Keating Five" and you'll see why. Maybe more people (an army, maybe?) should start asking questions about what happened in the eighties. If McCain is "swiftboated" on this issue he has little defense, in my opinion.
Yes, I'm familiar with the Keating Five story. It led directly to McCain-Feingold, to ensure that no one would ever be corrupted that way again! It's also discussed in this fascinating book.
STILL MORE: Reader Terrye Hugentober emails:
I had a real estate license for some time.{hated it} I was in the business when a lot of these loans first started coming out. Everyone knew that some of those people should not be getting loans, but the mortgage companies pushed the loans anyway. Building boomed, real estate took off and then the bottom fell out of the sub prime market. People let this go on as long as there was money to be made, it is not just about lazy people not paying their loans. And the truth is there will be a lot of innocent bystanders hurt if there is not some stability brought to that market. This could spread way beyond the people who got the loans or made the loans.
I think that just blowing it off and saying we should not bail out bad loans is over simplifying the situation.
I think it should cost everyone involved. But McCain was pandering here, with lame assaults on "greedy" Wall Streeters. And, as noted above, he's not really in a position to talk.
Meanwhile Megan McArdle notes that Europeans can't believe how easy we are on debtors who can't pay.
MORE STILL: Reader Steven DiSciullo emails:
I had one of these folks as a prospective client in my real estate business. He owed $225k on his house, which was worth about $175k. About half the debt was a second mortgage taken out long after he bought the house. The money was spent on vacations and other lifestyle support. He kept complaining about not being able to sell the house for what he owed on it. I finally said, "Look, you already got your money out of the house, and you didn't even have to sell it." A light went off in his head. He quit making payments, and stayed in the house free for another 8 months until he was evicted.
There is no reason to feel sorry for him.
Indeed. And Prof. T. Daniel Crawford writes:
I've been enjoying your blog for a number of years now, but tonight for some reason I feel compelled to write, even though I admit I don't have a dog in the mortgage crisis debate.
On the subject of sub-prime mortgages, I agree entirely that the debtors are fully responsible for their own terrible circumstances. But I don't believe the lenders aren't victims, either. Why in the world would a bank or automobile finance company give money to the woman described by your mortgage broker correspondent?
In my opinion, the feds shouldn't be bailing out either the lenders or the debtors in this sad scenario.
According to many in congress and social commentators, one of the main causes of the subprime mess was mortgage brokers doing loans for people that we knew could not repay the loan.
As a mortgage broker if I had a customer sitting in front of me who qualified for a loan (according to lender guidelines in place at the time), I was supposed to tell them that I was not going to do a loan for them because I don't think they will make their payments? Can you imagine the uproar if lenders and brokers did that to customers? Especially if the customer happened to be a minority. It comes down to a case of brokers being damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Yes, you don't want to be accused of "redlining," but on the other hand you don't want to be accused of loaning money to people who might not pay it back. It's the "Flounder Principle" rearing its ugly head again!
It wasn't really that hard to see this subprime mortgage mess coming. A couple years back, when we were in the process of purchasing a new home and just as the housing market was beginning to come off its peak, I noticed some of these mortgage offers. I actually thought no one would be stupid enough to actually take them up on the offers. I was wrong. . . .
Yes, people can be complete idiots. And they should take responsibility for their idiocy. On the other hand, let's be honest: many people do not really understand how these things work. And when you sit down with a mortgage broker, most times its the broker with the knowledge and power. And they can be good salesmen, particularly when a young couple (for instance) really wants that big beautiful house they saw, that's just barely out of reach financially for them. And the broker says, hey, look, here's what we can do....
Not all these people really understood what they were getting into. And brokers deserve their share of the ire. But right in the middle of an election, obviously the populists are out in full force. And it's not popular to blame (even in part) the voters for their financial screw ups. There's enough blame to go around. That most of it is being lobbed at financial institutions is more about politics than reality.
The question of a bail-out, though, has more to do with practicality than with fairness. Is it good for the economy as a whole to let these people take a bath? Probably not. Is it fair to the rest of us who weren't stupid enough to overstretch our financial means? Probably not. It seems to me that fixing the problem sooner rather than later is best. The long-term question (whether or not a bail-out will simply encourage more financial idiocy in the future) is a good one, and one which I have no answer to.
But I'm disappointed in McCain on this. Support a bail-out if you like. But be honest about the problem.
Yeah. And don't act like a government paycheck makes you morally superior to people in business. Where do you think the money for that paycheck comes from?
A DINNER TABLE POLL: "My mother, whom I have dubbed The Swing Voter because her vote has correctly called every presidential election since I was sentient, has announced that if Hillary is the nominee, she's voting Republican--regardless of who the Republican is. Meanwhile, the gay Republican vote is apparently going for McCain, with a margin of error of 100%." Which isn't much worse than polls in general, these days . . . .
AN ARMY OF DOOFUSES: "Anti-Scientology agitators have repeatedly harassed and threatened violence against a 59-year-old PG&E worker and his wife, who were mistakenly flagged as pro-Scientology hackers." It's the Internet equivalent of a wrong-house SWAT raid, though without any actual shootings. Another difference -- immediate apologies from the responsible parties.
Meanwhile, I have to note that whenever I turn on talk radio I hear a caller lamenting Fred Thompson's absence from the race. I have to wonder, though, just how many of those people actually donated money or volunteered in his campaign.
UPDATE: Advice from The Anchoress: Chill for a bit.
And reader Troy Hinrichs emails: "Hugh Hewitt has said, ad nauseum, on his radio show that if McCain wins the nomination he will vote for McCain and those who withhold their vote are basically dolts for doing so." I haven't heard his show lately -- it isn't on in Knoxville at the moment.
WHERE IS AL GORE? "A rare snowstorm swept the Middle East on Wednesday, blanketing parts of the Holy Land in white, shutting schools and sending excited children into the streets for snowball fights. . . . Men in long Arab robes pelted each other with snowballs in the Jordanian capital, Amman, and the West Bank city of Ramallah, seat of the Palestinian government, came to a standstill."
THE LATEST PUTIN VICTIM? "Vladimir Putin has now not only disqualified his former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov from running for president, he’s threatened him with prison."
EARMARKS AND OUTLAYS: A striking graphic from Larry Kudlow. On the program, Dick Armey called earmarks the "gateway drug for overspending."
UPDATE: Reader Tom Brosz emails: "I can't look at that chart without wondering how much of the Republican Party's problems stem from the departure of Newt Gingrich, who could almost be considered the conservative heart (or brain) of the Republican Congress. He left the House leadership after the 1998 elections, and you can see on that graph that the spending uptick started some time before Bush took office." Hmm.
TERMINATED: A look at the demise of Arnold Schwarzenegger's health-care plan, and what it means for Hillarycare 2.0. "Like collapses in Illinois, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, this one crumpled because of the costs, which are always much higher than anticipated. . . . This reveals that liberal health-care politics is increasingly the art of the impossible: You can't make coverage 'universal' while at the same time keeping costs in check -- at least without prohibitive tax increases."
AT THE SPECULIST, A SPECIAL EDITION of their Better All The Time good-news roundup, devoted just to energy news.
IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME: McCain Derangement Syndrome arrives. I understand people having issues with McCain, but people need to calm down soon. This is politics, the art of the possible, not the ideal. Some people on the right are starting to sound almost Kossack-like.
UPDATE: Bill Quick begs to differ. Hey, for everybody there's a point at which they'd rather take their marbles and go home. For me it would be Huckabee. For some Democrats it was Gore in 2000 and they voted Nader instead. For some Republicans it was GHW Bush in 1992 and they voted Perot.
What I find particularly hard to swallow, though -- and this is not Bill's problem -- are the people who say that if Romney doesn't make it they'll vote Democratic rather than support McCain because McCain's not a true conservative. Maybe not, but neither is Romney, and it seems like a strange place to draw the line. Those who hold a special grudge against McCain over immigration or McCain-Feingold are a different case. But again, everybody gets to vote how they want. Just be prepared to live with the results.
HE'LL BE GOING BACK TO ONE OF THE TWO AMERICAS -- the fancier one! John Edwards quits.
THEY TOLD ME THAT IF GEORGE W. BUSH WERE RE-ELECTED, political activists who circulated petitions critical of government policy would be tossed in jail. And they were right!
UPDATE: Why wait? A reader emails: "I think Bush should do it NOW, or at worst before his term ends. If it works as advertised and bankrupts the Saudis, Chavez, and the rest of OPEC, it will go down as the best thing he did in office, and I include Iraq in that assessment."
Sadly, the White House opposes the Zubrin plan because it's a "mandate," notwithstanding that it would be far less intrusive -- and far more beneficial -- than the increase in C.A.F.E. standards.
STILL MORE ON THE BRANDEIS DEBACLE: I encourage conservative and libertarian -- or just mischievous -- students to flood the system with complaints about anything that offends them. In particular, any criticisms of white, straight, male military veterans. A three-fer!
UPDATE: Er, actually, that would be a four-fer, wouldn't it? Oh, well -- all the better!
VOTE FRAUD ARRESTS: "A ward superintendent handpicked by the City Council’s 80-year-old elder statesman, Ald. Bernard Stone (50th), was arrested Monday and charged--along with another man--with improperly steering primarily Indian and Pakistani voters toward absentee ballots for Stone. Anish Eapen, a 37-year-old employee of the city’s Department of Streets and Sanitation, faces two counts of official misconduct, three counts of absentee ballot fraud and one count of mutilation of election materials. He allegedly worked in tandem with 34-year-old Armando Ramos, an unemployed student. Ramos faces two counts of absentee ballot fraud and two counts of mutilation of election materials." (Via NewsAlert.)
OKAY, THIS IS SILLY: "Disposable batteries, no matter how efficient, should be considered a controlled substance and, as such, should be sold under the same restrictions as, say, prescription drugs or guns."
A BLOG-REPORT FROM THE GUANGZHOU TRAIN STATION, where half a million people are stranded. Honestly, it doesn't look as bad as I would have expected. Some of the people even look kind of cheerful.
UPDATE: A reader emails:
Am in Guangzhou now at the Holiday Inn. The west train station, which is the origin of trains heading north, is where all the action is. There are reports from the scene on TVB, the Hong Kong TV station, as well as local news. The interesting thing is the link you posted doesn't work from behind the Great Firewall!
China Daily (the Party's English newspaper distributed in the mainland) had a front page story on deicing - by hand, using hammers - power lines north of us. There workers died when a pylon collapsed. Anhui and Hunan are particularly hard-hit, with China Daily reporting food shortages in some cities and traffic jams tens of kilometers long.
We are not going north, but south to Hong Kong (after we leave the US consulate) from the east train station, which still has a large crowd, even though the trains go south and east. I am glad we got out of Chongqing with our newly-adopted baby on Tuesday, as flights were cancelled and delayed.
Good luck.
THIS IS INTERESTING: "We were captivated by the Karma plug-in hybrid when it was unveiled at the Detroit Auto Show earlier this month. Its curvaceous, aggressive design combined with its ability to go 50 miles without using any gas seems like a bargain at the projected starting price of $80,000. . . . Vic Doolan, director of retail development for Fisker, says the company is considering metro Detroit to handle production. The combination of unused capacity, close proximity of suppliers, and availability of experienced workers make Detroit an ideal location."
January 29, 2008
WISH I'D HELD ON TO THAT SKYLAB CRASH HELMET: "The U.S. military is developing contingency plans to deal with the possibility that a large spy satellite expected to fall to Earth in late February or early March could hit North America."
CELL NOISE: "Although they won’t win a Grammy anytime soon, the various audio blips produced by cells are giving scientists insight into cellular biomechanics and could even be used to help detect cancer."
REVIEWING THE REVIEWERS: A roundup of book reviews from this weekend.
A 300% ERROR: "A week ago today, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) issued what had to be a hugely embarrassing news release acknowledging that an aggressively promoted and widely cited research report commissioned by the MPAA in 2005 significantly overstated the Internet-based peer-to-peer piracy of college students." A hair over 293%, actually. But that's still nothing to brag about.
WHY BILL GATES HATES CAPITALISM: "most business people hate capitalism, because capitalism implies competitiion, which business people hate. Especially monopolists like Bill Gates."
THE MEDIA, STILL TRYING TO martyr Obama? And it used to just be the occasional blog-commenter making Vince Foster jokes. I remember in one of Bruce Sterling's cyberpunk novels, the way you killed people was to get unstable nuts to go after them. Is this what the media is doing with Obama, putting ideas in people's heads? Isn't that kind of irresponsible?
IS TECHNOLOGY TRULY ADDICTIVE? I think that yammering on about addictions is the habit that some people need to kick . . . .
MICHAEL YON EMAILS: "Major offensive has begun in Mosul. This is likely Al Qaeda's last real stand in Iraq. Surely they will continue to murder people for a long time, but they are running out of places to hide. Just arrived Kuwait. Should be in Iraq tomorrow and will be in the middle of it." I look forward to the reports.
THOUGHTS FROM TIGERHAWK on why Bush seemed happy, including a rather positive assessment of the Iraq/Iran situation from Stratfor.
IS SNOPES pushing adware? I looked on Snopes and it said it was just an urban legend . . . .
I've been tracking the power of the blog here at Beltway Blogroll since June 2005, and as my days at National Journal come to a close this week, I can say unequivocally that Porkbusters is the most successful demonstration I have seen of that influence. It is also the one with the greatest staying power.
It's true that pork is still a problem and will remain one as long as Americans choose to elect panderers rather than statesmen. As I noted in November 2005, it's next to impossible to catch the greased pig in Congress.
But you simply can't deny that pork is a prominent policy issue now because of Porkbusters. Until bloggers across the political spectrum started ranting about pork after Hurricane Katrina, nobody outside of Republican presidential candidate John McCain, television broadcaster John Stossel and groups like Citizens Against Government Waste seemed to care -- and all of their outrage went unheard by Washington's powerbrokers.
Now the president is tackling the issue in the State of the Union. That is blog power, my friends.
THOUGHTS ON TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN ENHANCEMENT, from Sonia Arrison.
January 28, 2008
JOHN MCCAIN KERRY: I think McCain is overplaying the Vietnam vet thing. Who does that remind me of?
See, manly modesty is the way to go. Make too much of your military record, and you diminish it.
DON'T DROP THE SOAP: A side of Kathleen Sebelius I was unfamiliar with.
IN DEFENSE OF THE MINIVAN: "The minivan gets a bad rap in this country--it is almost universally reviled as a symbol of dweebish parenthood and mindless suburbia, a scarlet letter attached to soccer moms' chests. . . . The minivan's job is to haul people and cargo in as comfortable and efficient a manner as possible, and it fulfills that mission admirably." (Bumped).
WHAT DID CONGRESS GET FOR ITS PURCHASE OF CARBON OFFSETS? Nothing, basically.
BEST LINE OF THE NIGHT: “Others have said they would personally be happy to pay higher taxes. I welcome their enthusiasm, and I am pleased to report that the IRS accepts both checks and money orders.”
JIM DEMINT OFFERS THE CONSERVATIVE RESPONSE to the State of the Union. Which in itself is kind of bad for Bush . . . .
OKAY, I HAVE TO GLOAT JUST A BIT: Bush led off with earmarks. His actions aren't as bold as I'd like, but still -- back in 2005 when PorkBusters started, nobody in Washington cared and members of Congress were bragging about pork. Now the State of the Union leads of with an attack on earmarks, to thundering applause. Yeah, a lot of it's a sham. But hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue, and this kind of hypocrisy indicates that the anti-earmark momentum is growing.
UPDATE: Liveblogging the SOTU here. Also here. For the full prepared text of Bush's speech, click "read more."
Madam Speaker, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens:
Seven years have passed since I first stood before you at this rostrum. In that time, our country has been tested in ways none of us could have imagined. We have faced hard decisions about peace and war, rising competition in the world economy, and the health and welfare of our citizens. These issues call for vigorous debate, and I think it's fair to say we've answered that call. Yet history will record that amid our differences, we acted with purpose. And together, we showed the world the power and resilience of American self-government.
All of us were sent to Washington to carry out the people's business. That is the purpose of this body. It is the meaning of our oath. And it remains our charge to keep.
The actions of the 110th Congress will affect the security and prosperity of our Nation long after this session has ended. In this election year, let us show our fellow Americans that we recognize our responsibilities and are determined to meet them. And let us show them that Republicans and Democrats can compete for votes and cooperate for results at the same time.
From expanding opportunity to protecting our country, we have made good progress. Yet we have unfinished business before us, and the American people expect us to get it done.
In the work ahead, we must be guided by the philosophy that made our Nation great. As Americans, we believe in the power of individuals to determine their destiny and shape the course of history. We believe that the most reliable guide for our country is the collective wisdom of ordinary citizens. So in all we do, we must trust in the ability of free people to make wise decisions, and empower them to improve their lives and their futures.
To build a prosperous future, we must trust people with their own money and empower them to grow our economy. As we meet tonight, our economy is undergoing a period of uncertainty. America has added jobs for a record 52 straight months, but jobs are now growing at a slower pace. Wages are up, but so are prices for food and gas. Exports are rising, but the housing market has declined. And at kitchen tables across our country, there is concern about our economic future.
In the long run, Americans can be confident about our economic growth. But in the short run, we can all see that growth is slowing. So last week, my Administration reached agreement with Speaker Pelosi and Republican Leader Boehner on a robust growth package that includes tax relief for individuals and families and incentives for business investment. The temptation will be to load up the bill. That would delay it or derail it, and neither option is acceptable. This is a good agreement that will keep our economy growing and our people working. And this Congress must pass it as soon as possible.
We have other work to do on taxes. Unless the Congress acts, most of the tax relief we have delivered over the past 7 years will be taken away. Some in Washington argue that letting tax relief expire is not a tax increase. Try explaining that to 116 million American taxpayers who would see their taxes rise by an average of $1,800. Others have said they would personally be happy to pay higher taxes. I welcome their enthusiasm, and I am pleased to report that the IRS accepts both checks and money orders.
Most Americans think their taxes are high enough. With all the other pressures on their finances, American families should not have to worry about the Federal Government taking a bigger bite out of their paychecks. There is only one way to eliminate this uncertainty: make the tax relief permanent. And Members of Congress should know: If any bill raising taxes reaches my desk, I will veto it.
Just as we trust Americans with their own money, we need to earn their trust by spending their tax dollars wisely. Next week, I will send you a budget that terminates or substantially reduces 151 wasteful or bloated programs totaling more than $18 billion. And this budget will keep America on track for a surplus in 2012. American families have to balance their budgets, and so should their Government.
The people's trust in their Government is undermined by congressional earmarks — special interest projects that are often snuck in at the last minute, without discussion or debate. Last year, I asked you to voluntarily cut the number and cost of earmarks in half. I also asked you to stop slipping earmarks into committee reports that never even come to a vote. Unfortunately, neither goal was met. So this time, if you send me an appropriations bill that does not cut the number and cost of earmarks in half, I will send it back to you with my veto. And tomorrow, I will issue an Executive Order that directs Federal agencies to ignore any future earmark that is not voted on by the Congress. If these items are truly worth funding, the Congress should debate them in the open and hold a public vote.
Our shared responsibilities extend beyond matters of taxes and spending.
On housing, we must trust Americans with the responsibility of homeownership and empower them to weather turbulent times in the housing market. My Administration brought together the HOPE NOW alliance, which is helping many struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. The Congress can help even more. Tonight I ask you to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, modernize the Federal Housing Administration, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to help homeowners refinance their mortgages. These are difficult times for many American families, and by taking these steps, we can help more of them keep their homes.
To build a future of quality health care, we must trust patients and doctors to make medical decisions and empower them with better information and better options. We share a common goal: making health care more affordable and accessible for all Americans. The best way to achieve that goal is by expanding consumer choice, not government control. So I have proposed ending the bias in the tax code against those who do not get their health insurance through their employer. This one reform would put private coverage within reach for millions, and I call on the Congress to pass it this year. The Congress must also expand health savings accounts, create Association Health Plans for small businesses, promote health information technology, and confront the epidemic of junk medical lawsuits. With all these steps, we will help ensure that decisions about your medical care are made in the privacy of your doctor's office — not in the halls of Congress.
On education, we must trust students to learn if given the chance and empower parents to demand results from our schools. In neighborhoods across our country, there are boys and girls with dreams — and a decent education is their only hope of achieving them. Six years ago, we came together to pass the No Child Left Behind Act, and today no one can deny its results. Last year, fourth and eighth graders achieved the highest math scores on record. Reading scores are on the rise. And African-American and Hispanic students posted all-time highs. Now we must work together to increase accountability, add flexibility for States and districts, reduce the number of high school dropouts, and provide extra help for struggling schools. Members of Congress: The No Child Left Behind Act is a bipartisan achievement. It is succeeding. And we owe it to America's children, their parents, and their teachers to strengthen this good law.
We must also do more to help children when their schools do not measure up. Thanks to the D.C. Opportunity Scholarships you approved, more than 2,600 of the poorest children in our Nation's capital have found new hope at a faith-based or other non-public school. Sadly, these schools are disappearing at an alarming rate in many of America's inner cities. So I will convene a White House summit aimed at strengthening these lifelines of learning. And to open the doors of these schools to more children, I ask you to support a new $300 million program called Pell Grants for Kids. We have seen how Pell Grants help low-income college students realize their full potential. Together, we have expanded the size and reach of these grants. Now let's apply that same spirit to help liberate poor children trapped in failing public schools.
On trade, we must trust American workers to compete with anyone in the world and empower them by opening up new markets overseas. Today, our economic growth increasingly depends on our ability to sell American goods, crops, and services all over the world. So we are working to break down barriers to trade and investment wherever we can. We are working for a successful Doha round of trade talks, and we must complete a good agreement this year. At the same time, we are pursuing opportunities to open up new markets by passing free trade agreements.
I thank the Congress for approving a good agreement with Peru. Now I ask you to approve agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea. Many products from these nations now enter America duty-free, yet many of our products face steep tariffs in their markets. These agreements will level the playing field. They will give us better access to nearly 100 million customers. And they will support good jobs for the finest workers in the world: those whose products say "Made in the USA."
These agreements also promote America's strategic interests. The first agreement that will come before you is with Colombia, a friend of America that is confronting violence and terror and fighting drug traffickers. If we fail to pass this agreement, we will embolden the purveyors of false populism in our hemisphere. So we must come together, pass this agreement, and show our neighbors in the region that democracy leads to a better life.
Trade brings better jobs, better choices, and better prices. Yet for some Americans, trade can mean losing a job, and the Federal Government has a responsibility to help. I ask the Congress to reauthorize and reform trade adjustment assistance, so we can help these displaced workers learn new skills and find new jobs.
To build a future of energy security, we must trust in the creative genius of American researchers and entrepreneurs and empower them to pioneer a new generation of clean energy technology. Our security, our prosperity, and our environment all require reducing our dependence on oil. Last year, I asked you to pass legislation to reduce oil consumption over the next decade, and you responded. Together we should take the next steps: Let us fund new technologies that can generate coal power while capturing carbon emissions. Let us increase the use of renewable power and emissions-free nuclear power. Let us continue investing in advanced battery technology and renewable fuels to power the cars and trucks of the future. Let us create a new international clean technology fund, which will help developing nations like India and China make greater use of clean energy sources. And let us complete an international agreement that has the potential to slow, stop, and eventually reverse the growth of greenhouse gases. This agreement will be effective only if it includes commitments by every major economy and gives none a free ride. The United States is committed to strengthening our energy security and confronting global climate change. And the best way to meet these goals is for America to continue leading the way toward the development of cleaner and more efficient technology.
To keep America competitive into the future, we must trust in the skill of our scientists and engineers and empower them to pursue the breakthroughs of tomorrow. Last year, the Congress passed legislation supporting the American Competitiveness Initiative, but never followed through with the funding. This funding is essential to keeping our scientific edge. So I ask the Congress to double Federal support for critical basic research in the physical sciences and ensure America remains the most dynamic nation on earth.
On matters of science and life, we must trust in the innovative spirit of medical researchers and empower them to discover new treatments while respecting moral boundaries. In November, we witnessed a landmark achievement when scientists discovered a way to reprogram adult skin cells to act like embryonic stem cells. This breakthrough has the potential to move us beyond the divisive debates of the past by extending the frontiers of medicine without the destruction of human life. So we are expanding funding for this type of ethical medical research. And as we explore promising avenues of research, we must also ensure that all life is treated with the dignity it deserves. So I call on the Congress to pass legislation that bans unethical practices such as the buying, selling, patenting, or cloning of human life.
On matters of justice, we must trust in the wisdom of our Founders and empower judges who understand that the Constitution means what it says. I have submitted judicial nominees who will rule by the letter of the law, not the whim of the gavel. Many of these nominees are being unfairly delayed. They are worthy of confirmation, and the Senate should give each of them a prompt up-or-down vote.
In communities across our land, we must trust in the good heart of the American people and empower them to serve their neighbors in need. Over the past 7 years, more of our fellow citizens have discovered that the pursuit of happiness leads to the path of service. Americans have volunteered in record numbers. Charitable donations are higher than ever. Faith-based groups are bringing hope to pockets of despair, with newfound support from the Federal Government. And to help guarantee equal treatment for faith-based organizations when they compete for Federal funds, I ask you to permanently extend Charitable Choice.
Tonight the armies of compassion continue the march to a new day in the Gulf Coast. America honors the strength and resilience of the people of this region. We reaffirm our pledge to help them build stronger and better than before. And tonight I am pleased to announce that in April we will host this year's North American Summit of Canada, Mexico, and the United States in the great city of New Orleans.
There are two other pressing challenges that I have raised repeatedly before this body, and that this body has failed to address: entitlement spending and immigration.
Every Member in this chamber knows that spending on entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is growing faster than we can afford. And we all know the painful choices ahead if America stays on this path: massive tax increases, sudden and drastic cuts in benefits, or crippling deficits. I have laid out proposals to reform these programs. Now I ask Members of Congress to offer your proposals and come up with a bipartisan solution to save these vital programs for our children and grandchildren.
The other pressing challenge is immigration. America needs to secure our borders — and with your help, my Administration is taking steps to do so. We are increasing worksite enforcement, we are deploying fences and advanced technologies to stop illegal crossings, we have effectively ended the policy of "catch and release" at the border, and by the end of this year, we will have doubled the number of border patrol agents. Yet we also need to acknowledge that we will never fully secure our border until we create a lawful way for foreign workers to come here and support our economy. This will take pressure off the border and allow law enforcement to concentrate on those who mean us harm. We must also find a sensible and humane way to deal with people here illegally. Illegal immigration is complicated, but it can be resolved. And it must be resolved in a way that upholds both our laws and our highest ideals.
This is the business of our Nation here at home. Yet building a prosperous future for our citizens also depends on confronting enemies abroad and advancing liberty in troubled regions of the world.
Our foreign policy is based on a clear premise: We trust that people, when given the chance, will choose a future of freedom and peace. In the last 7 years, we have witnessed stirring moments in the history of liberty. We have seen citizens in Georgia and Ukraine stand up for their right to free and fair elections. We have seen people in Lebanon take to the streets to demand their independence. We have seen Afghans emerge from the tyranny of the Taliban to choose a new president and a new parliament. We have seen jubilant Iraqis holding up ink-stained fingers and celebrating their freedom. And these images of liberty have inspired us.
In the past 7 years, we have also seen images that have sobered us. We have watched throngs of mourners in Lebanon and Pakistan carrying the caskets of beloved leaders taken by the assassin's hand. We have seen wedding guests in blood-soaked finery staggering from a hotel in Jordan, Afghans and Iraqis blown up in mosques and markets, and trains in London and Madrid ripped apart by bombs. And on a clear September day, we saw thousands of our fellow citizens taken from us in an instant. These horrific images serve as a grim reminder: The advance of liberty is opposed by terrorists and extremists — evil men who despise freedom, despise America, and aim to subject millions to their violent rule.
Since September 11, we have taken the fight to these terrorists and extremists. We will stay on the offense, we will keep up the pressure, and we will deliver justice to the enemies of America.
We are engaged in the defining ideological struggle of the 21st century. The terrorists oppose every principle of humanity and decency that we hold dear. Yet in this war on terror, there is one thing we and our enemies agree on: In the long run, men and women who are free to determine their own destinies will reject terror and refuse to live in tyranny. That is why the terrorists are fighting to deny this choice to people in Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Palestinian Territories. And that is why, for the security of America and the peace of the world, we are spreading the hope of freedom.
In Afghanistan, America, our 25 NATO allies, and 15 partner nations are helping the Afghan people defend their freedom and rebuild their country. Thanks to the courage of these military and civilian personnel, a nation that was once a safe haven for al Qaida is now a young democracy where boys and girls are going to school, new roads and hospitals are being built, and people are looking to the future with new hope. These successes must continue, so we are adding 3,200 Marines to our forces in Afghanistan, where they will fight the terrorists and train the Afghan Army and police. Defeating the Taliban and al Qaida is critical to our security, and I thank the Congress for supporting America's vital mission in Afghanistan.
In Iraq, the terrorists and extremists are fighting to deny a proud people their liberty and to establish safe havens for attacks across the world. One year ago, our enemies were succeeding in their efforts to plunge Iraq into chaos. So we reviewed our strategy and changed course. We launched a surge of American forces into Iraq. And we gave our troops a new mission: Work with Iraqi forces to protect the Iraqi people, pursue the enemy in its strongholds, and deny the terrorists sanctuary anywhere in the country.
The Iraqi people quickly realized that something dramatic had happened. Those who had worried that America was preparing to abandon them instead saw tens of thousands of American forces flowing into their country. They saw our forces moving into neighborhoods, clearing out the terrorists, and staying behind to ensure the enemy did not return. And they saw our troops, along with Provincial Reconstruction Teams that include Foreign Service Officers and other skilled public servants, coming in to ensure that improved security was followed by improvements in daily life. Our military and civilians in Iraq are performing with courage and distinction, and they have the gratitude of our whole Nation.
The Iraqis launched a surge of their own. In the fall of 2006, Sunni tribal leaders grew tired of al Qaida's brutality and started a popular uprising called "The Anbar Awakening." Over the past year, similar movements have spread across the country. And today, this grassroots surge includes more than 80,000 Iraqi citizens who are fighting the terrorists. The government in Baghdad has stepped forward as well — adding more than 100,000 new Iraqi soldiers and police during the past year.
While the enemy is still dangerous and more work remains, the American and Iraqi surges have achieved results few of us could have imagined just 1 year ago:
When we met last year, many said containing the violence was impossible. A year later, high profile terrorist attacks are down, civilian deaths are down, and sectarian killings are down.
When we met last year, militia extremists — some armed and trained by Iran — were wreaking havoc in large areas of Iraq. A year later, Coalition and Iraqi forces have killed or captured hundreds of militia fighters. And Iraqis of all backgrounds increasingly realize that defeating these militia fighters is critical to the future of their country.
When we met last year, al Qaida had sanctuaries in many areas of Iraq, and their leaders had just offered American forces safe passage out of the country. Today, it is al Qaida that is searching for safe passage. They have been driven from many of the strongholds they once held, and over the past year, we have captured or killed thousands of extremists in Iraq, including hundreds of key al Qaida leaders and operatives. Last month, Osama bin Laden released a tape in which he railed against Iraqi tribal leaders who have turned on al Qaida and admitted that Coalition forces are growing stronger in Iraq. Ladies and gentlemen, some may deny the surge is working, but among the terrorists there is no doubt. Al Qaida is on the run in Iraq, and this enemy will be defeated.
When we met last year, our troop levels in Iraq were on the rise. Today, because of the progress just described, we are implementing a policy of "return on success," and the surge forces we sent to Iraq are beginning to come home.
This progress is a credit to the valor of our troops and the brilliance of their commanders. This evening, I want to speak directly to our men and women on the frontlines. Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen: In the past year, you have done everything we have asked of you, and more. Our Nation is grateful for your courage. We are proud of your accomplishments. And tonight in this hallowed chamber, with the American people as our witness, we make you a solemn pledge: In the fight ahead, you will have all you need to protect our Nation. And I ask the Congress to meet its responsibilities to these brave men and women by fully funding our troops.
Our enemies in Iraq have been hit hard. They are not yet defeated, and we can still expect tough fighting ahead. Our objective in the coming year is to sustain and build on the gains we made in 2007, while transitioning to the next phase of our strategy. American troops are shifting from leading operations, to partnering with Iraqi forces, and, eventually, to a protective overwatch mission. As part of this transition, one Army brigade combat team and one Marine Expeditionary Unit have already come home and will not be replaced. In the coming months, four additional brigades and two Marine battalions will follow suit. Taken together, this means more than 20,000 of our troops are coming home.
Any further drawdown of U.S. troops will be based on conditions in Iraq and the recommendations of our commanders. General Petraeus has warned that too fast a drawdown could result in the "disintegration of the Iraqi Security Forces, al Qaida-Iraq regaining lost ground, [and] a marked increase in violence." Members of Congress: Having come so far and achieved so much, we must not allow this to happen.
In the coming year, we will work with Iraqi leaders as they build on the progress they are making toward political reconciliation. At the local level, Sunnis, Shia, and Kurds are beginning to come together to reclaim their communities and rebuild their lives. Progress in the provinces must be matched by progress in Baghdad. And we are seeing some encouraging signs. The national government is sharing oil revenues with the provinces. The parliament recently passed both a pension law and de-Ba'athification reform. Now they are debating a provincial powers law. The Iraqis still have a distance to travel. But after decades of dictatorship and the pain of sectarian violence, reconciliation is taking place — and the Iraqi people are taking control of their future.
The mission in Iraq has been difficult and trying for our Nation. But it is in the vital interest of the United States that we succeed. A free Iraq will deny al Qaida a safe haven. A free Iraq will show millions across the Middle East that a future of liberty is possible. And a free Iraq will be a friend of America, a partner in fighting terror, and a source of stability in a dangerous part of the world.
By contrast, a failed Iraq would embolden extremists, strengthen Iran, and give terrorists a base from which to launch new attacks on our friends, our allies, and our homeland. The enemy has made its intentions clear. At a time when the momentum seemed to favor them, al Qaida's top commander in Iraq declared that they will not rest until they have attacked us here in Washington. My fellow Americans: We will not rest either. We will not rest until this enemy has been defeated. We must do the difficult work today, so that years from now people will look back and say that this generation rose to the moment, prevailed in a tough fight, and left behind a more hopeful region and a safer America.
We are also standing against the forces of extremism in the Holy Land, where we have new cause for hope. Palestinians have elected a president who recognizes that confronting terror is essential to achieving a state where his people can live in dignity and at peace with Israel. Israelis have leaders who recognize that a peaceful, democratic Palestinian state will be a source of lasting security. This month in Ramallah and Jerusalem, I assured leaders from both sides that America will do, and I will do, everything we can to help them achieve a peace agreement that defines a Palestinian state by the end of this year. The time has come for a Holy Land where a democratic Israel and a democratic Palestine live side-by-side in peace.
We are also standing against the forces of extremism embodied by the regime in Tehran. Iran's rulers oppress a good and talented people. And wherever freedom advances in the Middle East, it seems the Iranian regime is there to oppose it. Iran is funding and training militia groups in Iraq, supporting Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon, and backing Hamas' efforts to undermine peace in the Holy Land. Tehran is also developing ballistic missiles of increasing range and continues to develop its capability to enrich uranium, which could be used to create a nuclear weapon. Our message to the people of Iran is clear: We have no quarrel with you, we respect your traditions and your history, and we look forward to the day when you have your freedom. Our message to the leaders of Iran is also clear: Verifiably suspend your nuclear enrichment, so negotiations can begin. And to rejoin the community of nations, come clean about your nuclear intentions and past actions, stop your oppression at home, and cease your support for terror abroad. But above all, know this: America will confront those who threaten our troops, we will stand by our allies, and we will defend our vital interests in the Persian Gulf.
On the homefront, we will continue to take every lawful and effective measure to protect our country. This is our most solemn duty. We are grateful that there has not been another attack on our soil since September 11. This is not for a lack of desire or effort on the part of the enemy. In the past 6 years, we have stopped numerous attacks, including a plot to fly a plane into the tallest building in Los Angeles and another to blow up passenger jets bound for America over the Atlantic. Dedicated men and women in our Government toil day and night to stop the terrorists from carrying out their plans. These good citizens are saving American lives, and everyone in this chamber owes them our thanks. And we owe them something more: We owe them the tools they need to keep our people safe.
One of the most important tools we can give them is the ability to monitor terrorist communications. To protect America, we need to know who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying, and what they are planning. Last year, the Congress passed legislation to help us do that. Unfortunately, the Congress set the legislation to expire on February 1. This means that if you do not act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger. The Congress must ensure the flow of vital intelligence is not disrupted. The Congress must pass liability protection for companies believed to have assisted in the efforts to defend America. We have had ample time for debate. The time to act is now.
Protecting our Nation from the dangers of a new century requires more than good intelligence and a strong military. It also requires changing the conditions that breed resentment and allow extremists to prey on despair. So America is using its influence to build a freer, more hopeful, and more compassionate world. This is a reflection of our national interest and the calling of our conscience.
America is opposing genocide in Sudan and supporting freedom in countries from Cuba and Zimbabwe to Belarus and Burma.
America is leading the fight against global poverty, with strong education initiatives and humanitarian assistance. We have also changed the way we deliver aid by launching the Millennium Challenge Account. This program strengthens democracy, transparency, and the rule of law in developing nations, and I ask you to fully fund this important initiative.
America is leading the fight against global hunger. Today, more than half the world's food aid comes from the United States. And tonight, I ask the Congress to support an innovative proposal to provide food assistance by purchasing crops directly from farmers in the developing world, so we can build up local agriculture and help break the cycle of famine.
America is leading the fight against disease. With your help, we are working to cut by half the number of malaria-related deaths in 15 African nations. And our Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief is treating 1.4 million people. We can bring healing and hope to many more. So I ask you to maintain the principles that have changed behavior and made this program a success. And I call on you to double our initial commitment to fighting HIV/AIDS by approving an additional $30 billion over the next 5 years.
America is a force for hope in the world because we are a compassionate people, and some of the most compassionate Americans are those who have stepped forward to protect us. We must keep faith with all who have risked life and limb so that we might live in freedom and peace. Over the past 7 years, we have increased funding for veterans by more than 95 percent. As we increase funding, we must also reform our veterans system to meet the needs of a new war and a new generation. I call on the Congress to enact the reforms recommended by Senator Bob Dole and Secretary Donna Shalala, so we can improve the system of care for our wounded warriors and help them build lives of hope, promise, and dignity.
Our military families also sacrifice for America. They endure sleepless nights and the daily struggle of providing for children while a loved one is serving far from home. We have a responsibility to provide for them. So I ask you to join me in expanding their access to childcare, creating new hiring preferences for military spouses across the Federal Government, and allowing our troops to transfer their unused education benefits to their spouses or children. Our military families serve our Nation, they inspire our Nation, and tonight our Nation honors them.
The secret of our strength, the miracle of America, is that our greatness lies not in our Government, but in the spirit and determination of our people. When the Federal Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, our Nation was bound by the Articles of Confederation, which began with the words, "We the undersigned delegates." When Gouverneur Morris was asked to draft the preamble to our new Constitution, he offered an important revision and opened with words that changed the course of our Nation and the history of the world: "We the people."
By trusting the people, our Founders wagered that a great and noble Nation could be built on the liberty that resides in the hearts of all men and women. By trusting the people, succeeding generations transformed our fragile young democracy into the most powerful Nation on earth and a beacon of hope for millions. And so long as we continue to trust the people, our Nation will prosper, our liberty will be secure, and the State of our Union will remain strong. So tonight, with confidence in freedom's power, and trust in the people, let us set forth to do their business.
Rev. Al Sharpton on the ABC show "The View" today told former President Bill Clinton to "shut up". While not identifying any individual statements, Sharpton said Mr. Clinton should end the "race-tinged rhetoric".
When Al Sharpton is outraged by your race-baiting, well . . . .
I'M SHOCKED AT THIS ACT OF POLITICAL INFIDELITY: "The New York State chapter of the National Organization for Women attacked Ted Kennedy for his endorsement today with some real heat. . . . 'Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard.'"
READER RICK GIOVANELLI SENDS THIS STORY ON THE ECONOMY from The New York Times and observes, "Don't you wish Vegas or the online markets would let you bet on things like the number of articles linking a weak economy to President Bush compared to the number of articles (approximately zero) linking him to the strong economy of the past 4-5 years?"
You don't bet on certainties. But I'm reminded of a passage from Mark Penn's book on how the media treated the economy in 1992:
I have found over the years that there is often a huge disconnect between belief about the economy and the true economic state of affairs. Until the statistics are actually published, people tend to assess the economy through the eyes of the national media. In 1992, when Bill Clinton won the presidency based on worries about the economy, the statistics that came out after the election showed that the period leading up to November had actually been a period of record growth. . . . In his 1996 State of the Union speech, President Clinton said we had the best economy in thirty years -- a statement that sent a flurry of reporters to check actual statistics rather than popular political movements and sweeping, politically motivated statements. The more people looked at the facts, the more they agreed, and six months later, there was near-unanimity that the economy was in good shape. Had the economy changed? No, what had changed was knowledge about the true facts of the economy.
Hmm. Regardless of the data, we get bad economic "news" when there's a Republican in the White House., and good economic "news" when a Democrat is running for reelection. Perhaps that New York Times headline -- "Echo of First Bush" -- is more accurate than I first thought . . . .
On Tuesday, President Bush will issue an Executive Order directing Federal agencies to ignore any future earmark that is not voted on and included in a law approved by Congress. This will effectively end the common practice of concealing earmarks in so-called report language instead of placing them in the actual text of the bill. This means earmarks will be subject to votes, which will better expose them to the light of day and help constrain excessive and unjustified spending.
The Executive Order will provide that with regard to all future appropriations laws and other legislation enacted into law, executive agencies will not commit, obligate, or expend funds on the basis of earmarks from any non-statutory source, including requests included in congressional committee reports or other congressional documents, or communications from or on behalf of Members of Congress, or any other non-statutory source, except when required by law, or when an agency itself decides that a project or other transaction has merit under statutory criteria or other merit-based decision-making.
Good for him. If he'd done this in 2005, of course, the GOP might have kept its majority. But this is still the right thing to do.
UPDATE: Mark Tapscott calls it an empty gesture because it applies only to future bills. Not quite empty, but not enough.
THE TRUTH ABOUT JENA: "Why America’s black-and-white narratives about race don’t reflect reality."
TOOLMONGER is a blog that's -- I guess this is no surprise, given the name -- all about tools. Here's their Top 5 List for this week.
IMMIGRATION PUSHBACK FOR HILLARY: "Immigrant-rights advocates and some Latino leaders are voicing concern at Senator Clinton's campaign-trail rhetoric about swiftly deporting immigrants with a criminal past."
PORKBUSTERS UPDATE: A 12-step program for Earmark Withdrawal? This sounds promising:
As every reformed addict knows, the road to recovery is long and hard. So it is for Republicans who became addicted to spending "earmarks" while running Congress, lost their majority in large part because of it, and are now struggling with mixed results to dry out.
Their latest halting effort in what appears to be at least a 12-step recovery plan will come tonight, when President Bush uses his State of the Union address to lay down his toughest anti-earmarking pledge to date. We're told he will tell Congress that he will veto any fiscal 2009 spending bill that doesn't cut earmarks in half from 2008 levels. He will also report that he is issuing a Presidential order informing executive departments that from now on they should refuse to fund earmarks that aren't explicitly mentioned in statutory language.
Read the whole thing. It's progress. Too bad he didn't do this years ago. But still, it's progress.
ISSUES FOR THE TRUSTEES of large, wealthy universities.
HEH: "If they were trying to keep their affair a secret, you'd think they'd find someplace where political reporters wouldn't be walking by." Yes, if they were, you'd think they would.
SO I VISITED MY BROTHER THIS WEEKEND -- it was his birthday -- and you can see his blues duo 46 Long playing at a party below. (Shot with my tiny Sony -- not bad video and sound for a camera the size of a deck of cards with a microphone the size of a matchhead.)
Then we went to Southgate House, where the Cincinnati Blues Society was having a big to-do. 46 Long played again, and I met a bunch of my brother's bluesman and blueswoman friends, only some of whom wore porkpie hats. One of them was Jon Justice, pictured below, who's a really excellent guitarist, reminiscent of Roy Buchanan or a young Stevie Ray Vaughan, and with a fine singing voice as well. There were lots of other very talented and nice folks, though, and the Southgate House -- birthplace of the man who invented the Tommy Gun (no, really) -- was an extra-cool location.
It was a swell time, and my other brother, Brad -- his band is here -- came along too, and so did my dad, meaning that the greater Cincinnati area was briefly overrun with Reynolds men. They seem to have survived, and we certainly had a good time. We don't all get together in one place all that often, given all of our various travels and responsibilities, but it's always fun when we do. And it wasn't even my birthday! I hope there are many more celebrations like this.
On TV they've been confidently talking about Hillary's call for seating the Michigan and Florida delegations as if that will be her trump card at a contested convention. She'll almost certainly win the Florida vote next week, and she's already won in Michigan. But I don't see how the convention can fairly award Hillary the delegates from those states after the DNC got her competitors to pledge not to campaign in those states' primaries. Doesn't that discredit those primaries? Or should Obama and Edwards be punished because they obeyed their party?
I guess it's another example of the Flounder Principle at work! Of course, as I suggested before, if Hillary wins via trickery it's likely to backfire in November.
ANALYZING THE CANDIDATES' TYPOGRAPHY: ("The Hillary type palette is far from fresh and colorful; it is begging for legitimacy instead of demanding respect. . . . Huckabee has the most inexplicable selection of typography and graphics, from the six floating stars to the white stripe seemingly stolen from the Coca-Cola logo.") I did this back in 2004. Kerry won.
Meanwhile, since we're talking graphics, the Globe piece is confusingly laid out and doesn't even include all the images it describes. What's with that?
UPDATE: Alas, this election is unlikely to allow me to blog about ketchup as I did last time around. That's too bad. I like ketchup.
MORE SCRUTINY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: "Expanding their scrutiny of spending and other financial practices in higher education, leaders of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee on Thursday asked the 136 colleges with the largest endowments for a wealth of data and analysis about how they set tuition prices, mete out financial aid, and manage their endowments." A proper response to such a request is "none of your damn business," but as I've noted before, universities have put themselves in a poor position for that.
Here's the letter (PDF) from Sens. Max Baucus and Charles Grassley.
UPDATE: Reader Peter Ingemi emails: "Obama’s win may have rejiggered the race but your post has rejiggered the headline to 'Obama’s win reshapes race'. The world is just too strange." Heh. Indeed.
It's still alive at Yahoo! for the moment. And Tom Maguire joins the fun. "This portends a long day at The Onion and at Scrappleface as they strain to keep pace with the new competition."
ANOTHER UPDATE: Magazine veteran Gerard van der Leun explains what went wrong at Time.
P.R. GENIUS AT WORK! A web promoter helpfully copied me in on this email:
You asked why we do not submit to Instapundit. Actually, we do. And as recently as yesterday -- the series on energy dependence. That site, seemingly a one-man show, is hard to fathom. Today, it is all the South Carolina primary; apparently there is no other subject of consequence in the world. Yesterday, when we posted the energy dependence piece, Instapundit ran such items as "Digital Cameras Galore", "A NEW TREND IN CAR DESIGN: Vanishing ashtrays and cigarette lighters" (really important). And they (or he) somehow thought the following observation deserved our attention:
A Random Thought
Posted by Stephen Green on 24 Jan 2008 at 09:13 pm
It just occurred to me that one of these jokers — Clinton, McCain, Obama or Romney — is going to be the next President. It’s almost enough to make one pine for the old days of Bush v Gore.
Our piece is long for this crowd, maybe beyond the attention span of Insta's audience. It seems to feature short items, and a lot of them frivolous.
Well, you can scroll down and decide for yourself whether this is an accurate characterization of the site. But was copying me on this email a smart PR move? Doesn't seem that way to me. . . .
TERROR IN EUROPE: "Islamist extremists were planning attacks across Europe, especially against public transport, before their arrests in Barcelona last weekend, a Spanish paper reported on Saturday, citing a would-be attacker's testimony."
OUCH: "Lindsey Graham was on with Sean Hannity this evening and misrepresented Romney's statement. Par for the course for this reprehensible politician. What post do you think a President McCain would offer Lindsey Graham? I'm guessing Attorney General or Supreme Court Justice. Maybe both, if McCain gets two terms."
There is little to no systematic evidence that poverty-linked undernutrition--malnutrition caused by too little food intake--is an actual problem in America. "Food insecurity" numbers batted around by the FDA do not mean that people actually went hungry; they mean that people worried about going hungry, or changed their diet--usually by altering the composition of the diet, not by forgoing food--to avoid going hungry. But of actual sustained hunger, there is no evidence.
There is, on the other hand, a lot of evidence of obesity among the poor; their obesity rate is estimated at 36%, and the obesity rate among poor children seems to be about twice the rate among non-poor children. The poor people are eating more calories than they need. Yet we propose to stimulate the economy by giving the poor money that can only be spent on more food.
But if you cede hunger as an issue, you lose political appeal.
GAZA AND EGYPT: "If Israeli leaders had any p.r. sense and/or vision, they would use this opportunity to loudly ask why Egypt, which refused custody of Gaza when Israel returned the Sinai, is so adamant about refusing to do its part to relieve Palestinian suffering."