INDEED: "As Dan Rather --obviously TNR editors' role model-- would say: 'Courage.'"
MONSTERS EVERYWHERE? I don't care! I wonder if there will be a Dutch translation?
JAMES LILEKS: "If you could tell your previous 1997 incarnation one thing, what might it be?"
I'm pretty sure it would be "Buy Google."
A DIFFERENT SLANT ON ILLEGAL ALIENS: "If he wins his bid for the White House, Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson may be just the man to get to the bottom of the 60-year-old Roswell UFO mystery."
I GUESS THEY FIGURED THAT AFTER AHMADINEJAD AT COLUMBIA, IT WAS OKAY: "In the boneheaded move of the year, conservative student group Young Americans for Freedom invited British National Party (BNP) leader Nick Griffin, a flat-out racist and Holocaust denier, to speak about the dangers of Islam at Michigan State University."
MICKEY KAUS: "Will three surges late in his term salavage Bush's presidency? 1) Petraeus' 'surge' in Iraq; 2) Bernanke's rate-cutting liquidity surge to prevent the economy from sliding into recession; 3) The new border enforcement surge, which might tighten the unskilled labor market so the economy looks good from the bottom as well as the top (and save Bush from whiffing completely on a signature issue)?"
AT THE NEW REPUBLIC:Mistaking Vietnam movies for real life. "To read the Thomas pieces was, simply, to doubt them. And to wonder if its editors had ever actually met a soldier on his way to or from Iraq, or talked to any human being involved in the modern military."
TOM MAGUIRE: "Does the John Edwards campaign have a death wish? To the litany which includes the 28,000 square foot home, his job with a hedge fund (to learn about poverty!) and the $400 haircuts we can now add a story about the decision by the Edwards campaign to locate their campaign headquarters in the poshest part of posh Chapel Hill, North Carolina. And the death wish? Well, the location of his campaign headquarters was a non-story until the Edwards people got a bit heavy-handed with a UNC professor."
For months, citizens accused of running camera-monitored red lights in Knoxville were told they'd have to pay $67.50 just to have a hearing to contest the charge.
"The city acknowledges that was a mistake, having that incorrect language in the notice," attorney Michael S. Kelley told U.S. District Judge Thomas Phillips at a hearing Thursday.
Neither Deputy City Law Director Ron Mills nor Municipal Court Administrator Rick Wingate could say how long it took city officials to discover that error.
The whole thing has pretty much been outsourced: "Redflex Traffic Systems Inc., a private company tapped to administrate the camera-based enforcement program, was responsible for fashioning those citation forms."
Although the panel said it would not accept anonymous tips, it assured those who came forward that their identity would be held in the "strictest confidence."
But in an email sent out today, the committee inadvertently sent the email addresses of all the would-be whistleblowers to everyone who had written in to the tipline. The committee email was sent to tipsters who had used the website form, including presumably whistleblowers themselves, and all of the recipients of the email were accidentally included in the "to:" field -- instead of concealing those addresses with a so-called blind carbon copy or "bcc: . . .
Compounding the mistake, the committee later sent out a second email attempting to recall the original email; it, too, included all recipients in the "to:" field, according to a recipient of the emails.
That's gonna make people want to come forward. Meanwhile, how about some remedial education in "how to use email" for the Judiciary staff?
THANKS TO THE FOLKS WHO TESTED yesterday's SSRN download. It seems like a user-friendliness issue -- people didn't know to click on the "download from SSRN" button at the bottom of the page instead of the confusing download button at the top of the page that just takes you to the bottom. But you do have to have cookies enabled.
MELANIE SCARBOROUGH thinks D.C. cops are getting full of themselves: "Which statute requires law-abiding citizens to produce ID to walk down a sidewalk? What law says that citizens must explain to police where they are going and why?"
ETHICAL PARSING OF A LAWYER'S THREE-WAY: My prediction is that this will end up boosting law school applications.
MORE ON The New Republic, Beauchamp, and the Army, from Bob Owens. Including this observation: "As far as this story is concerned, it seems that only bloggers are doing the job that most journalists won't do, such as sending emails, asking questions, and making phone calls to those involved in the still-developing story."
BOMBS OVER BAGHDADHOLLYWOOD: "t doesn't matter how many Oscar winners are in front of or behind the camera — audiences are proving to be conscientious objectors when it comes to this fall's surge of antiwar and anti-Bush films."
MICKEY KAUS: "In a desperate bid for respectability, the struggling New York Times has begun an association with the prestigious bloggingheads.tv start-up."
STEPHEN GREEN explains the obvious. But note that no longer being a member of the Libertarian Party is hardly the same thing as not being a libertarian. If it were, there would be precious few libertarians left.
Rob Neppell (aka N.Z. Bear) made an astute point that the concerns of the largest blog on the Right—Instapundit—tends to drive our conversation. He pointed out for the audience that Reynolds was not a conservative but a self-professed libertarian who was once quoted as saying he'd be delighted to live in a country where happily married gay couples had closets full of assault weapons."
The panelists chuckled; the audience didn’t seem as amused. The reaction speaks volumes. The fact that many center-right bloggers care more about getting linked by a radical libertarian than they do in discussing the concerns of their fellow conservatives is one of the primary reasons the Right blogosphere is a failing to have the same impact as the Left.
I can't help being seductive -- it's just how I was made. But I don't see my failure to lead a conservative blogging revolution as a failure at all, since I'm, you know, not a conservative. People who don't like gay marriage can do their own blogging thing, and I'll link to 'em sometimes -- I do, after all -- but not with approval. I'm not on board the anti-gay-marriage, anti-abortion train, and never have been.
UPDATE: Reader Tucker Goodrich emails:
It'd be nice one day if the Republicans could figure out what theLibertarians never will: libertarianism is far and away the predominant political philosophy in the US. Neither the Democrats, the Republicans, or, especially, the Libertarians can figure this out, but your success, as well as Reagan's, are indicative of this fact.
Where Americans differ from the Libertarian party and the Democrats, is that they believe that they have a right to defend themselves. And this is such a critical issue, that the other differences really don't matter. The Republicans agree with Americans on the right to defense, but fall short on moralizing bossiness, and, well, corruption.
Three items would make the Republicans the majority party forever: A strong defense of defense, a libertarian take on social issues, and a conservative approach to finance.
Hmm... Sounds like Guiliani.
I'm no Ronald Reagan. And Giuliani is no libertarian. But Goodrich is right about what would make the Republicans a majority party.
THEY TOLD ME THAT IF GEORGE W. BUSH WERE RE-ELECTED, our society would be riddled with anonymous informers who would rat out politically unacceptable thoughts to the authorities. And they were right!
PERRY DE HAVILLAND: "I have argued in the past that violent repression, gulags and mass murder are not in fact the defining characteristics for a state to be 'totalitarian'. The defining characteristic is, as the word itself suggests, that control over people be pervasive and total... mass murderousness, goose-stepping troops, waving red (or whatever) flags are merely an incidental consequence."
I SAW SOMEBODY IN A BLOG COMMENT-THREAD bragging that he'd bought a used Ferrari for less than I paid for my RX-8. That's possible, I guess, but let's see -- I've had the RX-8 for 4 years now, and I've spent on maintenance . . . hmm . . . oh, yeah, absolutely nothing. For the used Ferraris, on the other hand, Autoblog observes: "Do bear in mind that a Ferrari is the gift that keeps on giving – to the dealership service department, from your wallet. The entry price might be reasonable enough (note the joke), but the maintenance costs are horrendous."
A LOOK AT THE FUTURE OF FOOD: "Dewis and his colleagues work to analyze hundreds of thousands of substances and develop compounds that will please the buying public in four ways—through smell, taste, sensation and emotion. To do so, flavor scientists are homing in on molecules, receptors, brain structures and genetic code that will enable them to create flavors tailored to consumers' palates, health condition, demographics, even genotype." I'm guessing that Nina Planck wouldn't approve.
Plus, further thoughts on Beauchamp and Foer from Bruce Rolston: "As for Beauchamp, it's really hard to destroy two careers at one stroke, but he seems to have done it. More shame on TNR, which was the only agency that could have prevented the young man's self-immolation here. One last thing: anyone who thinks Beauchamp has been intimidated by the army really should read the transcript, which shows pretty graphically that Foer wasn't above doing a fair bit of intimidating himself."
Also this: "What was really striking to me about the transcript was the complete self-interest Foer and Scoblic show in talking with a Private in an austere combat zone. Can he fax his signature to his lawyer right away? Can he call his U.S. based lawyer within the hour? Look, I have trouble doing those sorts of things on demand from my office HERE IN TORONTO. To blithely assume that a private at a combat outpost in a warzone can easily do those things for them (instead of, you know, his job with the fighting and the shooting and the glavin) and that the infrastructure that would be needed to support that, assuming it exists, exists purely for their benefit, just typifies the whole TNR mindset during this whole episode to me."
MORE: Major John Tammes emails: "It does appear that some good may come of this whole mess, at least for PVT Beauchamp and his squadmates. PVT Beauchamp's command has been quite forgiving (a 'local' reprimand letter in file is quite merciful). However, I would hope that this second chance would include some sort of public clearing of his buddies' names. While continuing to serve out his assignment is to Beauchamp's credit, to leave the matter hanging (as it stands back in the US media) seems to make this an incomplete attempt to regain his comrades' trust. I would advise PVT Beauchamp to publicly clear the men he served, and continues to serve, alongside."
BASED ON A RECOMMENDATION OVER AT SAMIZDATA, I ordered Lee Child's Killing Floor and I thought it was quite good. I liked all the blues references, too.
MY EARLIER BORK POST raised some questions on what I think we ought to do about the confirmation mess. Actually, I've had some thoughts on that very subject, and you can read them here. I made them a while ago, but since they were never adopted, and since the problem has gotten worse, they're actually even more timely than when I first made them! Er, or something like that, anyway.
UPDATE: Reader Bill McConnell emails: "I don't know why you bother with those links to SSRN. I have never been able to read any of your work on that site. Apparently it is subscription only." I don't think there should be a problem -- I tested one at the Apple Store, and I'm pretty sure they're not an SSRN member. Can most folks out there download these? Give it a try and let me know.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Eric Wilner emails:
The layout of the page is confusing at first; my first couple of visits (however long ago that was), I didn't pick up on the "scroll down to the bottom to find the download-the-PDF link" aspect, and got the idea it was a subscription site. Perhaps your reader is having the same difficulty?
Hmm. I dunno. When I click on the "download" button at the top, it bounces me to the bottom of the page where the download buttons are. And reader Tom Paine (real name? who knows?) emails: "I just downloaded (for the first time) one of your papers (Bork confirmation) from ssrn with no difficulties. I was leery of downloading them before, but maybe now I'll download more articles in the future. Thanks for all your work."
Thanks, Tom. It seems to be working for most people who are trying it. Let me know if you experience difficulties. It may matter if you have cookies enabled; I'm not sure.
MORE: This seems to mostly be a user-friendliness issue, with people not realizing that the download buttons are at the bottom of the page. (Where it says "Download the Document from: Social Science Research Network.") Apparently, however, you do have to have cookies enabled.
AND THAT'S WHAT'S UNFORGIVABLE: "He has said things about Cuba that you will never hear from the major university faculties, or the major newspapers, or the major movie studios."
U.S.-MADE CENSORWARE sold to dictators in Burma and elsewhere. This is a disgrace.
I PREFER THE MOPTOPS, but now it's British Invasion II! Plus this observation, which is really rather damning:
The White House, amazingly, does not have a staffer dedicated to the international press. That was unforgivable with the international press being so important for winning hearts and minds in the war on terror. Now that the British media is set to become a big player within the US population it's poor domestic politics, too.
The White House's press operation has never been very good.
UPDATE: Link was bad before. Fixed now.
CONFESSIONS OF A former card-carrying Libertarian. I'm one of those, myself. Takeaway line: "From here, it looks as if the Republicans have become wrong and corrupt, the Democrats are stupid and corrupt, and the Libertarians have gone plain crazy."
UPDATE: Bill Quick: "Do I ever understand where Steve is coming from, because I live in the same damned place."
ED MORRISSEY: "I find it hilariously ironic that Foer refuses to defend himself and TNR in his own magazine, but instead goes whining to Howard Kurtz -- at the newspaper that he demanded Beauchamp refuse to engage. I wonder why Kurtz didn't ask him about that, and ask Foer why he was talking to the Post when he didn't want Beauchamp to do so."
UPDATE: John Tabin notes something interesting in the Kurtz interview: "Wait -- back up there. Foer had another conversation with Beauchamp? Is there a recording? Are there notes? What exactly was said? What parts of the story did Beauchamp defend? Did he answer specific questions about the articles? Why hasn't TNR felt the need to tell their readers of this conversation? And why did Kurtz stick this bit of news at the end of paragraph seven, without any further explanation?"
Maybe Kurtz missed the significance. I did, until Tabin and several readers pointed it out.
MEGAN MCARDLE on education: "Every time I see some middle class parent prattling about vouchers 'destroying' the public schools by 'cherry picking' the best students, when they've made damn sure that their own precious little cherries have been plucked out of the failing school systems, I seethe with barely controllable inward rage. It is the vilest hypocrisy on display in American politics today."
CODE CRAZY. In a similar setting, would anti-abortion protesters in "Operation Rescue" t-shirts be allowed up-close to wave bloody hands at Ruth Bader Ginsburg? Somehow, I doubt it.
The soldier whose New Republic article about military cruelty in Iraq was labeled false by Army investigators refused to defend his accusations when questioned by the magazine, even after being told that the editors could no longer support him unless he cooperated. . . .
Despite the contentious conversation, Foer continued to defend the article days later. He did so again yesterday, reiterating that other soldiers whom the magazine would not identify had confirmed the allegations.
While Beauchamp "didn't stand by his stories in that conversation, he didn't recant his stories," Foer said in an interview. "He obviously was under considerable duress during that conversation, with his commanding officer in the room with him."
Read the whole thing. Is there some other reason -- besides suicidal stubbornness -- that Foer is afraid to admit they got gulled? They told Beauchamp they'd have to retract if he wouldn't back up the story, he didn't back up the story, and now they're not retracting.
UPDATE: Here's a Big Beauchamp roundup. And I wouldn't be surprised to see further developments this week, despite TNR's efforts to make the story go away.
ANOTHER UPDATE: A reader emails:
The person in the room with Beauchamp was his squad leader. He is a Staff Sergeant, not Beauchamp's commanding officer. ANY familiarity with the military would prevent embarrassing little gaffes like this, and big ones like hiring Pvt. Beauchamp. And BTW, that SSG advised Beauchamp to talk to TNR and cancel with Newsweek & WaPo, as Foer was requesting.
A little familiarity with the military would have done The New Republic a lot of good in general.
A NEW STYLE OF CIVIL RIGHTS PROTEST: "College students across the country have been strapping empty holsters around their waists this week to protest laws that prohibit concealed weapons on campus, citing concerns over campus shootings. . . . Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, a group of college students, parents and citizens who organized after the deadly shootings at Virginia Tech University in April, launched the protest."
HEY, BIG SPENDER: "The President's defenders point to Congress' voracious appetite as the cause of the spending increase, but Congress could not spend this much alone. President Bush enabled Congress' fiscal excesses by refusing to veto ever-increasing spending bills — many of which were passed by a Republican Congress — while the administration simultaneously pushed for more federal spending on education, agriculture, and other items."
DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I suspect the soldier's substitution of "Night Rider" for "Knight Ridder" was deliberate, a response to a pushy jerk.
While reading the arrogant snotty Knight Ridder reporter blog, I couldn't help think THINGS MUST BE BORING FOR REPORTERS in IRAQ if they are reduced to blogging about airport like travel snags going in and out of the green zone a couple a times a day and using it only as a short cut at the same time being blase' about their paperwork?
Cemetery workers feeling the pinch, and taxi drivers who relied on morgue fares bummed out? Now reporters blogging about being so secure they aren't carrying around their proper papers at all times?
Things are looking UP!
Good point.
ANOTHER UPDATE: The entire reporter's blog is now returning a 404. Guess he took it down. Horse, barn door, and all that. The original post has been preserved for posterity elsewhere. But his bio is honest: "At last count, he also knows how to offend people in at least a dozen languages – the list is growing – although he can take part in civilized conversation in a mere handful."
MARK STEYN: Beauchamp takes a powder: "The New Republic is currently owned by my old friends and compatriots, the Asper family. Back when I toiled for the company in Canada, David Asper publicly told one of his own newspapers to 'put up or shut up'. He should have said the same months ago when The New Republic was bragging about its commitment to rigorous and open investigation of the matter. The magazine is unable to 'put up', so it has shut up, and hopes that its silence will help the story die in the shadows. Beauchamp's 15 minutes are up. The issue now is the magazine's conduct, and the Aspers should recognize that and act accordingly."
REBECCA AGUILAR UPDATE: Stiffing other journalists, and getting this noble reaction: "Incidentally, my change of heart has nothing to do with the text message I received from Aguilar this morning telling me that she had been interviewed by Ed 'Uncle Barky' Bark for his blog. This message came after our two off-the-record conversations Tuesday and her promises that'd she'd call me -- the first reporter she had spoken to at length, she said -- if she decided to talk. Changing my opinion of Aguilar's story because I was stiffed on an interview would be petty, mean and vengeful, and that's just not me."
The "Uncle Barky" interview is here. Related item here.
Meanwhile, Aguilar gets support from UNITY: Journalists of Color, who opine: "Upon reviewing the interview, it is apparent that while Aguilar used bold tactics to pursue the story, she did not violate any journalistic standards."
Remember this when bloggers start ambushing TV reporters in parking lots and driveways. It's not "stalking," it's just "bold tactics."
THE SUPREME COURT will look at certiorari in the D.C. gun-ban case on November 9. We'll probably hear something on November 13, though not necessarily.
"THE PROBLEM IS NOT WITH THE PEOPLE THAT STARTED THIS. THE PROBLEM'S WITH US." That's a Robert Redford breakout line from the trailer to his new war-on-terror movie that just appeared on my TV. It certainly sums up a certain worldview.
Just another case where the narrative was right, but the facts were wrong.
UPDATE: Franklin Foer is complaining about the leak, which is itself kind of funny, but most notably he doesn't dispute the accuracy of the documents. (Bumped).
ANOTHER UPDATE: More from John Tabin, including links to the documents:
So where does this leave TNR? We have their Executive Editor saying "we just can't, in good conscience, continue to defend" Beauchamp's work, and that until they have the truth they can't let it drop. We have Beauchamp saying that he doesn't care one way or another whether they retract his pieces. So why didn't they retract them? TNR's behavior since September 7 has amounted to pretending that this conversation never happened, that the veracity of Beauchamp's articles is still undetermined, and that they have no ethical obligation to retract. But it did, it isn't, and they do.
Conservatives can get their message across through dedicated channels, but it’s always going to be the “alternative” viewpoint. About 50% of Memeorandum is mainstream “news.” About 30% is partisan — split pretty evenly between left and right. The rest is the long tail. Holding our own in that 30% doesn’t matter much if the other 50% leans left and dominates the narrative.
Iraq is illustrative of this emergency. The fact that we have to scrounge for change between the pillows to send guys like Jeff Emanuel to do real reporting in Iraq is a disgrace. There should be a standing $10 million annual investment to fund 50 embeds in Iraq at a time, who can not only churn out readable 900-word pieces but can also do video from the front, including when the guns go off. All this original reporting should be aggregated on a dedicated channel like Politico, ThinkProgress, or OfftheBus. There should be a partnership with Fox News to provide video in places mainstream reporters won’t go.
The lack of such an infrastructure is not for lack of interest. Lots of bloggers have been over to Iraq, a commitment which makes the professional activists in the leftosphere look like dilettantes. Guys like Jeff, Bill Roggio, and Michael Yon have been the advance guard for this stuff. But nothing little has been done to institutionalize their work, to create counter-memes by controlling the upstream information flow through a system for nurturing these upstart war reporters. The failure to develop an effective counter-narrative out of Iraq is reflective of the “conservative message machine” and its reluctance to think outside the box.
Every movement or media phenomenon starts with amateurs improvising. But at some point it has to be professionalized if it’s going to be sustained and grow. The new progressive movement started with guys like Atrios, who then got picked up by Media Matters. Dozens of lefty bloggers are employed by the new lefty infrastructure. . . . If someone has $2 million to throw around on Rush Limbaugh’s letter, then someone has a few million to spend on a blogger-journalists to investigate Democratic corruption or on a sustained project to get out different storylines about Iraq or to set up an open-source research operation to more closely bracket the coverage. And it doesn’t have to be done through any existing institution, with all its offline encumbrances. The Politico, already at #4 on Memeorandum, shows the power of doing it as a startup.
Yes, the folks in the GOP apparat have been complacent, while the Democrats have been hungry. We know how that particular story usually ends . . . .
MORE UNSUCCESSFUL battlespace preparation. "Think Progress is perilously close to that point, and runs the distinct risk of becoming the next Truthout.org if they don't clean their act up soon."
UPDATE: Tom Smith reports: "The fire is creeping toward my street. I'm trying to follow progress on San Diego News Eight. I'm basically sick with anxiety. It's hard not to be."
"WELCOME TO NON-NEW ORLEANS:" Bill Bradley reports from the SoCal fires. Hmm. Hurricane Charley in Florida went okay. Katrina response in Mississippi was a lot better than in New Orleans. Now California seems to be dealing with this disaster competently. What could explain these differences?
At the very least, they should be embarrassed about their snarky response to those who doubted the story.
UPDATE: Reader Kyle Kveton emails:
Let us hope that TNR and its defenders will salute the "leaker" of this information as ardently as they saluted the leakers of classified national security information which appeared on the front pages of our "papers of record".
As I recall, TNR isn't very supportive of those who leak secrets that make TNR look bad. And I notice that Peter Scoblic of TNR seems awfully anxious to make sure that the record reflects his non-involvement with the decision to publish the Beauchamp piece.
I'm not seeing anything at TNR's website yet, though.
MORE: Reader Bob Kramer looked at the TNR website: "A search for 'Beauchamp' now matches no documents. I tried this a couple of weeks ago and could still find matches."
He's right.
Still more here. "Now, here is a truly disgusting moment. Beauchamp lets TNR know he wants to talk to other news outlets to tell them he is NOT being censored. And what does TNR do? It attempts to censor him. Franklin Foer, and I quote, leans on Beauchamp to 'let us control the way this story proceeds.'”
STILL MORE: Another reader points out that no searches are working at the TNR site right now. Possibly it's just a technical glitch.
EVEN MORE: Now the Drudge links aren't working. But you can find the documents he links to here. Go figure. But note that TNR isn't disputing the documents' accuracy, just Drudge's take. And here's an email from TNR:
My name is Ben Wasserstein and I'm the editor of The New Republic's website, TNR.com. As readers of Instapundit have noticed, and as we wrote about yesterday http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=3c2accec-63b5-449d-9c96-6c5e6e6867cb our relaunched website is unfortunately very much a work in progress, and has many bugs. At the moment, no searches are working, and some of our archives have not yet made the transition to the new site, including all comments on pre-relaunch articles and blog posts. In the meantime, articles pertaining to Scott Thomas Beauchamp can be found at the below URLs:
Thanks, Ben. And stay tuned, folks, as there's probably more to come. And Dan Riehl has some observations.
Stephen Spruiell has further thoughts. And there's this observation: "It does seem bizarre to me, too, that TNR didn't release these documents on their own. They are in an awful spot and it is made worse by not just providing everything they know. "
If the magazine had come forward with how this asshole blew them off, we suspect they'd have garnered a decent amount of support. Instead, it now looks like they were just hoping everyone would forget about the whole thing.
That seems right to me.
FACT-CHECKING MIKE HUCKABEE: Shockingly, it turns out that most signers of the Declaration of Independence weren't clergymen, as he claimed. What could he be thinking? How could anyone who knows anything about the signers of the Declaration of Independence think that?
I haven't looked at the video to see if maybe he misspoke or was misquoted, but the sheer absurdity of this statement would argue in favor of that. Or, alternatively, in favor of voting for someone who knows something about the basics of American history. (Via The Corner).
THAT WAS FAST: "Eliot Spitzer, the Governor of my state, has achieved a thing I would have thought impossible: He has made me yearn for the days of George Pataki."
Just seeing "Pataki" and "yearn" in the same sentence is messing with my mind.
DOUBLE-REVERSE CHICKENDOVE. "The politics aside, there is something particularly loathsome about Friedman’s snide screed this morning. . . . War supporter turned surrender enthusiast makes ironic funny about how painful this war has been for him. The terrible barrage of headlines, slogging through all those long, bitter thumbsuckers. News is hell. But apparently, he hasn’t been reading it."
J.D. JOHANNES WANTS TO GO BACK TO IRAQ and finish his documentary. He's asking for your help. He's also posted some cool video at the link. While Hollywood makes films about how we lost Iraq, he's been actually reporting what's going on. I've donated.
IN THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR:Media myths about the Jena 6. "The media got most of the basics wrong. In fact, I have never before witnessed such a disgrace in professional journalism. Myths replaced facts, and journalists abdicated their solemn duty to investigate every claim because they were seduced by a powerfully appealing but false narrative of racial injustice."
The narrative was right, but the facts were wrong. Where have I heard that before?
CHRIS ANDERSON: "So the problem with the music labels is not that music is an industry in decline, but that they have a too-narrow view of what business they're in."
UPDATE: Still more thoughts on the press coverage from Dean Barnett:
YOU'D THINK THIS would be a big story. After all, the mainstream media makes such a show of "supporting the troops" at every turn, you'd think it would rush to report the amazing story of our soldiers accomplishing what many observers declared "impossible" and "unwinnable" not so long ago.
It hasn't worked out that way. When General Ricardo Sanchez (ret.) addressed the situation in Iraq on October 11, he proclaimed that America was "living a nightmare with no end in sight." Naturally, the "nightmare" quote wound up in the first paragraph of the New York Times report on Sanchez's comments. What didn't find its way into the Times' report was any context of what's going on in Iraq. The "nightmare" assessment would have been a whole lot more fitting when Sanchez was helping run the show in Iraq in 2006 than it is today. . . .
WHAT'S MOST FRUSTRATING about the press's reporting about Iraq is that you just know the next time something goes wrong, be it a car bomb slipping through or a mishap involving American soldiers, that story will get above-the-fold treatment in America's major dailies. . . . Of course, there is nothing wrong with the media reporting the bad news out of Iraq. Indeed, it's their duty. But there is something profoundly wrong with the media reporting the bad news while disingenuously ignoring the progress we've made, progress that's only been made because of the sacrifices of 160,000 American soldiers.
Yes, it's almost as if undermining morale on the domestic front were a key goal. When the history of media reportage on this war is written, it will not be kind.
ADVICE FOR THE G.O.P., from Bill Quick. "The two hottest issues in the country - the war on terror and immigration - favor the GOP - if the Grand Old Party has the cojones to take these issues and ride them to victory." You think?
I MENTIONED "MEAN GIRLS" AT WELLESLEY BEFORE, but now this is a really mean girl at Wellesley. "A 20-year-old female student at Wellesley College was charged today with breaking into a dormitory at MIT and stabbing her former boyfriend seven times as he slept, according to police and prosecutors."
MICKEY KAUS: "Sen. Reid has filed for cloture on the Dream Act, meaning a vote could come tomorrow (Wednesday)."
WE'VE ALL USED THIS EXCUSE, HAVEN'T WE? "I would have blogged about it if it weren't for those pesky kids."
I can't recommend enough the Stainless Steel Presto 8 Qt. at Amazon with the "Better Together" Lorna Sass book combo.
Bought it for my wife last year and it has more than paid for itself. The cookbook is excellent, and things that used to take lots of time and electricity, such as beans or legumes, are prepared quickly. Homemade apple butter and the most amazing lobster bisque (pressure wash those lobster bodies with a little clam broth) are some of our own experimentation.
Reader Rosemary Bright offers a useful warning:
Words of wisdom: when using the pressure cooker, before opening it you take off the little thing on top to let out all the steam. The key words here "Let Out ALL the Steam".
As a bride I was hurriedly cooking vegetable soup before my father-in-law came for lunch so I threw it all in the pressure cooker. I didn't wait until all the steam completely out and opened the lid (which is a twist and lock sort of thing). Soup went all over every where -- I jumped back so it didn't burn me, but it was all over the walls, the stove, the floor …. A mess.
So, Let All the Steam out before opening. Otherwise, a great way to cook fast (potatoes, for example - or rump roasts) and tender.
Good advice, I'm sure. Reader Kay Dinolfo emails:
I have both a stovetop (25+ y.o.) and a self-contained electric pressure cooker (bought off HSN). Like them both, and biggest difference in cooking is how much more you have to babysit the stovetop model to keep it cooking steadily. Not difficult, but needs more attention. The electric one, you just plug in, set the time, and you're off to the races. HOWEVER... like buying a foreign car, repairs are much more difficult on my electric one, which wound up with a broken handle. Took me ages just to find the replacement parts, and I wound up buying a freight-damaged cooker off eBay for a dollar for its parts. The stovetop model is a Presto and my local Ace Hardware store carries any and all the replacement parts (gaskets, primarily, which wear out) conveniently and economically.
Reader Thomas Wright emails:
If you like cooking beans and whole grains, or making stews and pot roasts, pressure cookers can be loads of fun. They can be used as regular pots as well, so they do double duty. I use mine at least once a month, sometimes once a week.
Pressure cooker advice is simple. For the best brand that is easily available: Fagor. They are reasonable priced, well made and easy to maintain and come in a variety of sizes.
Pressure cookers are very good at two things. Cooking grains and legumes, and cooking tough meats.
The "queen" of pressure cooker cooking is Lorna Sass. I recommend this cookbook for some great recipes.
And, finally, Clarice Feldman emails:
I have two Kuhn Rikon pressure cookers. They are wonderful for making stews in a hurry and fabulous for making risotto. The best Indian cookbook writer I know recommended it--she has some curry recipes using a pressure cooker--and so many chefs were raving about risotto made (fast) in pressure cookers, I tried it. I now never make it any other way.
So there you are.
UPDATE: A tip from reader Robbins Mitchell:
I grew up in Paris,Tn and my mother would cook pot roasts and quick cook potatoes for mashing in the pressure cooker...and when she took it off the stove, she would ALWAYS hold it under cold running water in the sink for a minute or so to condense the steam before removing the little thingy on top just to make sure there were no accidents....and there never were.
I had a girlfriend from Paris, Tn when I was in college. She was a credit to her hometown.
ANOTHER UPDATE: The Kuhn Rikons are high-rated, but kind of pricey.
MICHAEL YON WRITES that things are settling down in Iraq. And he emails, "Amazing. If Iraq keeps going this direction, my job will be done here next year. The violence is plummeting." Sorry to see Yon out of a job, but that'll be good news.
And maybe by next year he'll be reporting from Iran.